2,500 research outputs found
Dublin City University at QA@CLEF 2008
We describe our participation in Multilingual Question Answering at CLEF 2008 using German and English as our source and target languages respectively. The system was built using UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture) as underlying framework
Learning Parse and Translation Decisions From Examples With Rich Context
We present a knowledge and context-based system for parsing and translating
natural language and evaluate it on sentences from the Wall Street Journal.
Applying machine learning techniques, the system uses parse action examples
acquired under supervision to generate a deterministic shift-reduce parser in
the form of a decision structure. It relies heavily on context, as encoded in
features which describe the morphological, syntactic, semantic and other
aspects of a given parse state.Comment: 8 pages, LaTeX, 3 postscript figures, uses aclap.st
Towards a machine-learning architecture for lexical functional grammar parsing
Data-driven grammar induction aims at producing wide-coverage grammars of human languages. Initial efforts in this field produced relatively shallow linguistic representations such as phrase-structure trees, which only encode constituent structure. Recent work on inducing deep grammars from treebanks addresses this shortcoming by also
recovering non-local dependencies and grammatical relations. My aim is to investigate the issues arising when adapting an existing Lexical Functional Grammar (LFG) induction method to a new language and treebank, and find solutions which will generalize robustly across multiple languages.
The research hypothesis is that by exploiting machine-learning algorithms to learn morphological features, lemmatization classes and grammatical functions from treebanks we can reduce the amount of manual specification and improve robustness, accuracy and domain- and language -independence for LFG parsing systems. Function labels can often be relatively straightforwardly mapped to LFG grammatical functions. Learning them reliably permits grammar induction to depend less on language-specific LFG annotation rules. I therefore propose ways to improve acquisition of function labels from treebanks and translate those improvements into better-quality f-structure parsing.
In a lexicalized grammatical formalism such as LFG a large amount of syntactically relevant information comes from lexical entries. It is, therefore, important to be able
to perform morphological analysis in an accurate and robust way for morphologically rich languages. I propose a fully data-driven supervised method to simultaneously
lemmatize and morphologically analyze text and obtain competitive or improved results on a range of typologically diverse languages
FREQUENCY IN MORPHOLOGY
calls the traditional rule-based view of grammar into question. These authors emphasize that grammatical rule systems aiming at syntax-directed translation, and even rule systems aimed at the description of a single language, break down when faced with the actual complexit
Morphological Analysis as Classification: an Inductive-Learning Approach
Morphological analysis is an important subtask in text-to-speech conversion,
hyphenation, and other language engineering tasks. The traditional approach to
performing morphological analysis is to combine a morpheme lexicon, sets of
(linguistic) rules, and heuristics to find a most probable analysis. In
contrast we present an inductive learning approach in which morphological
analysis is reformulated as a segmentation task. We report on a number of
experiments in which five inductive learning algorithms are applied to three
variations of the task of morphological analysis. Results show (i) that the
generalisation performance of the algorithms is good, and (ii) that the lazy
learning algorithm IB1-IG performs best on all three tasks. We conclude that
lazy learning of morphological analysis as a classification task is indeed a
viable approach; moreover, it has the strong advantages over the traditional
approach of avoiding the knowledge-acquisition bottleneck, being fast and
deterministic in learning and processing, and being language-independent.Comment: 11 pages, 5 encapsulated postscript figures, uses non-standard NeMLaP
proceedings style nemlap.sty; inputs ipamacs (international phonetic
alphabet) and epsf macro
Towards a Protein-Protein Interaction information extraction system: recognizing named entities
[EN] The majority of biological functions of any living being are related to Protein Protein Interactions (PPI). PPI discoveries are reported in form of research publications whose volume grows day after day. Consequently, automatic PPI information extraction systems are a pressing need for biologists. In this paper we are mainly concerned with the named entity detection module of PPIES (the PPI information extraction system we are implementing) which recognizes twelve entity types relevant in PPI context. It is composed of two sub-modules: a dictionary look-up with extensive normalization and acronym detection, and a Conditional Random Field classifier. The dictionary look-up module has been tested with Interaction Method Task (IMT), and it improves by approximately 10% the current solutions that do not use Machine Learning (ML). The second module has been used to create a classifier using the Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications (JNLPBA 04) data set. It does not use any external resources, or complex or ad hoc post-processing, and obtains 77.25%, 75.04% and 76.13 for precision, recall, and F1-measure, respectively, improving all previous results obtained for this data set.This work has been funded by MICINN, Spain, as part of the "Juan de la Cierva" Program and the Project DIANA-Applications (TIN2012-38603-C02-01), as well as the by the European Commission as part of the WIQ-EI IRSES Project (Grant No. 269180) within the FP 7 Marie Curie People Framework.Danger Mercaderes, RM.; Pla Santamaría, F.; Molina Marco, A.; Rosso, P. (2014). Towards a Protein-Protein Interaction information extraction system: recognizing named entities. Knowledge-Based Systems. 57:104-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.010S1041185
- …