14,693 research outputs found

    A comparison of resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging to invasive electrocortical stimulation for sensorimotor mapping in pediatric patients

    Get PDF
    Localizing neurologic function within the brain remains a significant challenge in clinical neurosurgery. Invasive mapping with direct electrocortical stimulation currently is the clinical gold standard but is impractical in young or cognitively delayed patients who are unable to reliably perform tasks. Resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging non-invasively identifies resting state networks without the need for task performance, hence, is well suited to pediatric patients. We compared sensorimotor network localization by resting state fMRI to cortical stimulation sensory and motor mapping in 16 pediatric patients aged 3.1 to 18.6โ€ฏyears. All had medically refractory epilepsy that required invasive electrographic monitoring and stimulation mapping. The resting state fMRI data were analyzed using a previously trained machine learning classifier that has previously been evaluated in adults. We report comparable functional localization by resting state fMRI compared to stimulation mapping. These results provide strong evidence for the utility of resting state functional imaging in the localization of sensorimotor cortex across a wide range of pediatric patients

    FMRI resting slow fluctuations correlate with the activity of fast cortico-cortical physiological connections

    Get PDF
    Recording of slow spontaneous fluctuations at rest using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) allows distinct long-range cortical networks to be identified. The neuronal basis of connectivity as assessed by resting-state fMRI still needs to be fully clarified, considering that these signals are an indirect measure of neuronal activity, reflecting slow local variations in de-oxyhaemoglobin concentration. Here, we combined fMRI with multifocal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), a technique that allows the investigation of the causal neurophysiological interactions occurring in specific cortico-cortical connections. We investigated whether the physiological properties of parieto-frontal circuits mapped with short-latency multifocal TMS at rest may have some relationship with the resting-state fMRI measures of specific resting-state functional networks (RSNs). Results showed that the activity of fast cortico-cortical physiological interactions occurring in the millisecond range correlated selectively with the coupling of fMRI slow oscillations within the same cortical areas that form part of the dorsal attention network, i.e., the attention system believed to be involved in reorientation of attention. We conclude that resting-state fMRI ongoing slow fluctuations likely reflect the interaction of underlying physiological cortico-cortical connections

    A Resting-State fMRI Study

    Get PDF
    Mirror visual feedback (MVF) is a promising approach to enhance motor performance without training in healthy adults as well as in patients with focal brain lesions. There is preliminary evidence that a functional modulation within and between primary motor cortices as assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) might be one candidate mechanism mediating the observed behavioral effects. Recently, studies using task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have indicated that MVF-induced functional changes might not be restricted to the primary motor cortex (M1) but also include higher order regions responsible for perceptual-motor coordination and visual attention. However, aside from these instantaneous task-induced brain changes, little is known about learning-related neuroplasticity induced by MVF. Thus, in the present study, we assessed MVF- induced functional network plasticity with resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI). We performed rs-fMRI of 35 right-handed, healthy adults before and after performing a complex ball-rotation task. The primary outcome measure was the performance improvement of the untrained left hand (LH) before and after right hand (RH) training with MVF (mirror group [MG], n = 17) or without MVF (control group [CG], n = 18). Behaviorally, the MG showed superior performance improvements of the untrained LH. In resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC), an interaction analysis between groups showed changes in left visual cortex (V1, V2) revealing an increase of centrality in the MG. Within group comparisons showed further functional alterations in bilateral primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), left V4 and left anterior intraparietal sulcus (aIP) in the MG, only. Importantly, a correlation analysis revealed a linear positive relationship between MVF-induced improvements of the untrained LH and functional alterations in left SM1. Our results suggest that MVF-induced performance improvements are associated with functional learning-related brain plasticity and have identified additional target regions for non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, a finding of potential interest for neurorehabilitation

    based on resting state fMRI

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์œตํ•ฉ๊ณผํ•™๊ธฐ์ˆ ๋Œ€ํ•™์› ๋ถ„์ž์˜ํ•™ ๋ฐ ๋ฐ”์ด์˜ค์ œ์•ฝํ•™๊ณผ, 2021.8. ์œ„์›์„.๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„์˜ ์‹ค์„ธ๊ณ„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์ด ์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์—ญํ• ์„ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ตœ๊ทผ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์  ๋‡Œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋Š” ์Œ๊ณก๊ธฐํ•˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง€๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์ด ๋ฐํ˜€์กŒ๋‹ค. ๋‡Œ์˜ ๊ตฌ์กฐ์™€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์€ ๋ฐ€์ ‘ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ, ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์—ญ์‹œ ์Œ๊ณก๊ธฐํ•˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ง€๋‹ˆ๊ณ  ์žˆ์Œ์„ ์ถ”์ •ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฒˆ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ, ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋Š” ํœด์‹๊ธฐ ๋‡Œ ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช…์˜์ƒ(rs-fMRI)์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ์ถ”์ถœํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ ์ปค๋„ฅํ†ฐ(connectome)์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋ฅผ ์Œ๊ณก๊ณต๊ฐ„์— ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ(embed)ํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์ด ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ๊ผญ์ง€์ ์€ 274๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ฏธ๋ฆฌ ์ •์˜๋œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ์˜์—ญ(ROI) ํ˜น์€ 6mm ํฌ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋ณต์…€(voxel)์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ๋กœ ์ •์˜๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ผญ์ง€์  ์‚ฌ์ด์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ์„ฑ์€ ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช… ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ ๊ฐ ์˜์—ญ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ BOLD ์‹ ํ˜ธ์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ผ์ • ๋ฌธํ„ฑ๊ฐ’(threshold)์„ ์ ์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ๊ฒฐ์ •๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์Œ๊ณก๊ธฐํ•˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํŠน์ง•์ธ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ-ํ”„๋ฆฌ(scale-free)๋ฅผ ๋งŒ์กฑํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด, ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์ฐจ์ˆ˜(degree) ๋ถ„ํฌ์˜ ๊ธ‰์ˆ˜์„ฑ(power-law)์„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ฐจ์ˆ˜์˜ ํ™•๋ฅ ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ณก์„ ์€ ๋กœ๊ทธ-๋กœ๊ทธ ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์˜ ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„์—์„œ ์šฐํ•˜ํ–ฅํ•˜๋Š” ์ง์„  ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์ฆ‰ ์ฐจ์ˆ˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ์ฐจ์ˆ˜์˜ ์Œ์˜ ๊ธ‰์ˆ˜ํ•จ์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์–ด์ง์„ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์–ด์„œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ธฐ์ € ๊ธฐํ•˜๋ฅผ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๊ทธ๋ž˜ํ”„๋ฅผ ์œ ํด๋ฆฌ๋“œ, ์Œ๊ณก, ๊ตฌ๋ฉด์  ํ‹์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋‹ค์–‘์ฒด๋“ค์— ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž„๋ฒ ๋”ฉ์˜ ์ถฉ์‹ค์„ฑ ์ฒ™๋„(fidelity measure)๋“ค์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ด ๋œ ์  ๋‹ค์–‘์ฒด๋“ค ์ค‘, 10์ฐจ์› ๋ฐ 2์ฐจ์› ์Œ๊ณก๊ณต๊ฐ„์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ๋’คํ‹€๋ฆผ(distortion)์ด ๋™์ผ ์ฐจ์›์˜ ์œ ํด๋ฆฌ๋“œ ๋‹ค์–‘์ฒด์™€ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๋” ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด์–ด, ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ฒดํ™” ๋ฐ ์‹œ๊ฐํ™”ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ทธ ํŠน์ง•์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ์ด์ฐจ์›์˜ ์Œ๊ณก ์›ํŒ์— 1/โ„2 ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด ์ด์ฐจ์›์˜ ๊ทน์ขŒํ‘œ ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜ ๋ชจ๋ธ์—์„œ ๋ฐ˜๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๊ฐ ์ฐจ์›์˜ ์ขŒํ‘œ๋Š” ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๊ผญ์ง€์ ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ ์ธ๊ธฐ๋„ ๋ฐ ์œ ์‚ฌ๋„๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค. ROI ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ํŠน๋ณ„ํžˆ ๋†’์€ ์ธ๊ธฐ๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ–๋Š” ์˜์—ญ์€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•„ ์ž„๋ฒ ๋“œ๋œ ์›ํŒ์˜ ์ค‘์‹ฌ๋ถ€์— ๋นˆ ๊ณต๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ํ•œํŽธ ๊ฐ™์€ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์—ฝ(lobe)์— ์†ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค์€ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๊ฐ๋„ ์˜์—ญ ๋‚ด์— ๋ฐ€์ง‘๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€์ธก ๋™์ผ ์—ฝ์— ์†ํ•œ ์˜์—ญ๋“ค ์—ญ์‹œ ๊ทธ ๊ฐ์ขŒํ‘œ์˜ ๋ถ„ํฌ๊ฐ€ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋Š” ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋‡Œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ํ•ด๋ถ€ํ•™์  ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋ฐ˜๋Œ€์ธก ๋™์ผ ์—ฝ ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์—ฐ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ๋ณต์…€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ์†Œ๋‡Œ์— ์†ํ•œ ๋ณต์…€๋“ค ์ค‘ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋„“์€ ๊ฐ์ขŒํ‘œ ์˜์—ญ์— ํฉ๋ฟŒ๋ ค์ง„ ํ˜„์ƒ์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ฐœ๊ฐœ ๋ณต์…€์˜ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์ด์งˆ์„ฑ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ, ์ „ ์˜์—ญ์— ๊ฑธ์ณ ๋งค์šฐ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฐ์ขŒํ‘œ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌํ˜•์˜ ๋ง‰๋Œ€ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์ ์˜ ์ง‘ํ•ฉ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋†’์€ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง„ ๋ณต์…€๋“ค๋กœ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณต์…€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์—์„œ ๋‡Œ์˜ ๋…๋ฆฝ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋ถ„์„(ICA) ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๋‚˜์˜จ ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋“ค์„ ํ”Œ๋กœํŒ…ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ฐ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์ด ๋†’์€ ๋ฐ€์ง‘๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ ๋‘ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก  ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์œ ์‚ฌ์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์žํ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ์žฅ์• ์˜ ABIDE II ์˜คํ”ˆ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ์…‹์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ 1/โ„2 ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ๊ทผ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ, ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ํ™˜์ž ๊ทธ๋ฃน๊ณผ ์งˆ๋ณ‘๊ตฐ ํ™˜์ž ๊ฐœ์ธ์˜ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ถ„์„์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์งˆ๋ณ‘๊ตฐ์—์„œ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋‚˜, ๊ทธ ์ค‘ ์žํ์ฆ ์ง„๋‹จ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ํ”ผ์งˆ-์„ ์กฐ์ฒด ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์˜ ์ด์ƒ์ด, ์•„์Šคํผ๊ฑฐ์ฆํ›„๊ตฐ ์ง„๋‹จ์„ ๋ฐ›์€ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ ํ›„์œ„๊ด€์ž๊ณ ๋ž‘ (posterior superior temporal sulcus) ์„ ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์˜ ์ด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„์˜ ์žฌํ˜„์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์ž„๋ฒ ๋”ฉ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ง๋‹จ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€ ๊ผญ์ง€์ ์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•˜๋ฉด ๋†’์€ ์žฌํ˜„์„ฑ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ์˜์ƒ์˜ ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด(time series) ๋‚ด ์ผ๊ด€์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์˜์ƒ์„ ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋ถ„๋ฆฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€์„ ๋•Œ, 4๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆˆ ์‹œ๊ณ„์—ด ์˜์ƒ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์–ป์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ 30์ดˆ ๊ธธ์ด์˜ 30๊ตฌ๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋‰˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ๋Š” ์ผ๊ด€์ ์ธ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋‡Œ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์  ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋ถ„์„ ์ค‘ ์ตœ์ดˆ๋กœ ๊ธฐํ•˜ํ•™์  ๊ด€์ ์—์„œ ์ง„ํ–‰๋œ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ด€์  ๋ฐ ์งˆ๋ณ‘๊ตฐ ๋Œ€์ƒ์—์„œ ๋‡Œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ์˜ ์ด์ƒ์„ ์ฐพ๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋ก ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค๋Š” ์˜์˜๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค.For most of the real-world networks, geometry plays an important role in organizing the network, and recent works have revealed that the geometry in the structural brain network is most likely to be hyperbolic. Therefore, it can be assumed that the geometry of the functional brain network would also be hyperbolic. In this study, we analyzed the functional connectomes from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to prove this hypothesis and investigate the characteristics of the network by embedding it into the hyperbolic space, by utilizing human connectome project (HCP) dataset for healthy young adults and Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II (ABIDE II) dataset for diseased autism subject and control group. Nodes of the network were defined at two different scales: by 274 predefined ROIs and 6mm-sized voxels. The adjacency between the nodes was determined by computing the correlation of the time-series of the BOLD signal of brain regions and binarized by adopting threshold value. First, we aimed to find out whether the network was scale-free by investigating the degree distribution of the functional brain network. The probability distribution function (PDF) versus degree was plotted as a straight line at a log-log scale graph versus the degree of nodes. This indicates that degree distribution is roughly proportional to a power function of degree, or scale-free. To clarify the most fitting underlying geometry of the network, we then embedded the graph into manifolds of Euclidean, hyperbolic, or spherical spaces and compared the fidelity measures of embeddings. The embedding to the hyperbolic spaces yielded a better fidelity measure compared to other manifolds. To get a discrete and visible map and investigate the characteristics of the network, we embedded the network in a two-dimensional hyperbolic disc by the 1/โ„2 model. The radial and angular dimensions in the embedding is interpreted as popularity and similarity dimensions, respectively. The ROI-wise analysis revealed that no nodes with particularly high popularity were found, which was revealed by a vacant area in the center of the disk. Nodes in the same lobe were more likely to be clustered in narrow similarity dimensions, and the nodes from the homotopic lobes were also functionally clustered. The results indicate the anatomic relevance of the functional brain network and the strong functional coherence of the homotopic area of the cerebral cortex. The voxel-wise analysis revealed additional features. A large number of voxels from the cerebellum were scattered in the whole angular position, which might reflect the functional heterogeneity of the cerebellum in the sub-ROI level. Additionally, multiple rod-shaped substructures of radial direction were found, which indicates sets of voxels with functional similarity. When compared with independent component analysis (ICA)-driven results, each large-scale component of the brain acquired by ICA showed a consistent pattern of embedding between the subjects. To find the abnormality of the network in the diseased patient, we utilized the autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) dataset. The two groups of ASD and the control group were found to be comparable in means of the quality of embedding. We calculated the hyperbolic distance between all edges of the network and searched for the alteration of the distance of the individual brain network. Among the variable results among the networks of ASD group subjects, the alteration of the cortico-striatal pathway in an autism patient and posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS) in an Aspergerโ€™s syndrome patient were present, respectively. The two different anatomically-scaled layers of the network showed a certain degree of correspondence in terms of degree-degree correlation and spreading pattern of network. But anatomically parcellated ROI did not guarantee the functional similarity between the voxels composing it. Finally, to investigate the reproducibility of the embedding process, we repeatedly performed the embedding process and computed the variance of distance matrices. The result was stable except for end-positioned non-popular nodes. Furthermore, to investigate consistency along time-series of fMRI, we compared network yielded by segments of the time series. The segmented networks showed similar results when divided into four frames, but the result lost consistency when divided into 30 frames of 30 seconds each. This study is the first to investigate the characteristics of the functional brain network on the basis of hyperbolic geometry. We suggest a new method applicable for assessing the network alteration in subjects with a neuropsychiatric disease, and these approaches grant us a new understanding in analyzing the functional brain network with a geometric perspective.1. Introduction 1 1.1. Human brain networks 1 1.1.1. Geometry of human brain networks 2 1.2. Scale-free network 3 1.2.1. Definition of a scale-free network 4 1.3. Embedding of the network in hyperbolic space 5 1.3.1. Hyperbolic spaces and Poincarรฉ disk 5 1.3.2. Geometric model of 1/โ„2 9 1.4. The aim of the present study 10 2. Methods 12 2.1. Subjects and image acquisition 12 2.1.1. Human connectome project (HCP) dataset 12 2.1.2. Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II (ABIDE II) dataset 12 2.2. Preprocessing for resting-state fMRI 15 2.3. Resting-state networks and functional connectivity analysis 16 2.3.1. Analyzing degree distribution 18 2.4. Assessing underlying geometry 18 2.4.1. The three component spaces 18 2.4.2. Embedding into spaces 20 2.5. Embedding of the network in the 1/โ„2 model 22 2.6. Comparison with ICA-driven method 23 2.7. Assessing the quality of embedding 23 2.8. Abnormality detection in the diseased subject 24 2.9. Assessing variability of analysis 27 3. Results 29 3.1. Global characteristics of the network 29 3.1.1. The degree distribution 31 3.1.2. Determining the threshold value of network 34 3.2. Graph embedding into spaces 36 3.3. 1/โ„2 model analysis 39 3.4. Quality of the embedding 58 3.5. Alteration of the network in the diseased subject 61 3.6. Variability of results 63 3.6.1. Reproducibility of Mercator 63 3.6.2. Time variance of results 67 4. Discussion 70 4.1. Composition of the network 70 4.2. Scale-freeness of brain network 71 4.3. The underlying geometry of brain network 73 4.4. Hyperbolic plane representation 75 4.4.1. Voxelwise approach 78 4.4.2. Compatibility with ICA 80 4.5. Alteration of the network in ASD subjects 81 4.6. Variability and reproducibility of methods 83 4.7. Further applications 85 5. Conclusion 87 References 89 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 106๋ฐ•

    Self-similar correlation function in brain resting-state fMRI

    Full text link
    Adaptive behavior, cognition and emotion are the result of a bewildering variety of brain spatiotemporal activity patterns. An important problem in neuroscience is to understand the mechanism by which the human brain's 100 billion neurons and 100 trillion synapses manage to produce this large repertoire of cortical configurations in a flexible manner. In addition, it is recognized that temporal correlations across such configurations cannot be arbitrary, but they need to meet two conflicting demands: while diverse cortical areas should remain functionally segregated from each other, they must still perform as a collective, i.e., they are functionally integrated. Here, we investigate these large-scale dynamical properties by inspecting the character of the spatiotemporal correlations of brain resting-state activity. In physical systems, these correlations in space and time are captured by measuring the correlation coefficient between a signal recorded at two different points in space at two different times. We show that this two-point correlation function extracted from resting-state fMRI data exhibits self-similarity in space and time. In space, self-similarity is revealed by considering three successive spatial coarse-graining steps while in time it is revealed by the 1/f frequency behavior of the power spectrum. The uncovered dynamical self-similarity implies that the brain is spontaneously at a continuously changing (in space and time) intermediate state between two extremes, one of excessive cortical integration and the other of complete segregation. This dynamical property may be seen as an important marker of brain well-being both in health and disease.Comment: 14 pages 13 figures; published online before print September 2

    DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for โ€œPipelineโ€ Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI

    Get PDF
    Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has attracted more and more attention because of its effectiveness, simplicity and non-invasiveness in exploration of the intrinsic functional architecture of the human brain. However, user-friendly toolbox for โ€œpipelineโ€ data analysis of resting-state fMRI is still lacking. Based on some functions in Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM) and Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit (REST), we have developed a MATLAB toolbox called Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI (DPARSF) for โ€œpipelineโ€ data analysis of resting-state fMRI. After the user arranges the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) files and click a few buttons to set parameters, DPARSF will then give all the preprocessed (slice timing, realign, normalize, smooth) data and results for functional connectivity, regional homogeneity, amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF), and fractional ALFF. DPARSF can also create a report for excluding subjects with excessive head motion and generate a set of pictures for easily checking the effect of normalization. In addition, users can also use DPARSF to extract time courses from regions of interest

    Phenotyping Superagers Using Resting-State fMRI

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Superagers are defined as older adults with episodic memory performance similar or superior to that in middle-aged adults. This study aimed to investigate the key differences in discriminative networks and their main nodes between superagers and cognitively average elderly controls. In addition, we sought to explore differences in sensitivity in detecting these functional activities across the networks at 3T and 7T MR imaging fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five subjects 80 years of age or older were screened using a detailed neuropsychological protocol, and 31 participants, comprising 14 superagers and 17 cognitively average elderly controls, were included for analysis. Participants underwent resting-state-fMRI at 3T and 7T MR imaging. A prediction classification algorithm using a penalized regression model on the measurements of the network was used to calculate the probabilities of a healthy older adult being a superager. Additionally, ORs quantified the influence of each node across preselected networks. RESULTS: The key networks that differentiated superagers and elderly controls were the default mode, salience, and language networks. The most discriminative nodes (ORs > 1) in superagers encompassed areas in the precuneus posterior cingulate cortex, prefrontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, temporal pole, extrastriate superior cortex, and insula. The prediction classification model for being a superager showed better performance using the 7T compared with 3T resting-state-fMRI data set. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the functional connectivity in the default mode, salience, and language networks can provide potential imaging biomarkers for predicting superagers. The 7T field holds promise for the most appropriate study setting to accurately detect the functional connectivity patterns in superagers
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore