12 research outputs found

    Impacts of DigestaWell NRG Supplementation on Post Exercise Muscle Soreness in Unconditioned Horses, a Pilot Study

    Get PDF
    Exercising horses are commonly plagued by muscle fatigue and soreness, which can result in reduced performance ability. In the present study, ten unconditioned horses were fed 200g per day DigestaWell NRG, a commercial dietary supplement containing Yucca schidigera and Trigonella foenum-graecum, two herbs shown in other species to reduce post-exercise muscle pain and soreness. A control, unsupplemented group contained ten horses of similar age, breed, and gender. Horses completed a 50 minutes, ridden standardized exercise test of moderate intensity immediately prior to (Period1) and after 28 days of supplementation (Period2). Muscle soreness and tightness were evaluated 24 hours prior to and after each exercise test and used to determine the percent increase in post-exercise muscle soreness and tightness. Blood samples were collected before, and at 10 and 30 minutes, and 1, 4, and 24 hours post exercise. Plasma was analyzed for glucose, lactate, non-esterified fatty acid, tumor necrosis factor-α, and interleukin-1β concentrations. Data were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA using SAS Enterprise Guide v. 7.1. No changes in plasma parameters were indicated between periods for unsupplemented horses (P \u3e 0.1) during Period2, excepting glucose, which was greater during Period2 (P = 0.018). Supplemented horses had lesser concentrations of tumor necrosis factor-α (P = 0.016) and lactate (P = 0.058) during Period2 than during Period1. During Period2, supplemented horses experienced a smaller percent increase in post exercise muscle soreness (P = 0.031). DigestaWell NRG supplementation may benefit unconditioned horses undergoing moderate intensity exercise through reducing lactate production and inflammation

    The single-cell landscape of cystic echinococcosis in different stages provided insights into endothelial and immune cell heterogeneity

    Get PDF
    IntroductionHydatid cysts and angiogenesis are the key characteristics of cystic echinococcosis, with immune cells and endothelial cells mediating essential roles in disease progression. Recent single-cell analysis studies demonstrated immune cell infiltration after Echinococcus granulosus infection, highlighting the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of targeting certain cell types in the lesion microenvironment. However, more detailed immune mechanisms during different periods of E. granulosus infection were not elucidated.MethodsHerein, we characterized immune and endothelial cells from the liver samples of mice in different stages by single-cell RNA sequencing.ResultsWe profiled the transcriptomes of 45,199 cells from the liver samples of mice at 1, 3, and 6 months after infection (two replicates) and uninfected wild-type mice. The cells were categorized into 26 clusters with four distinct cell types: natural killer (NK)/T cells, B cells, myeloid cells, and endothelial cells. An SPP1+ macrophage subset with immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic functions was identified in the late infection stage. Single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering (SCENIC) analysis suggested that Cebpe, Runx3, and Rora were the key regulators of the SPP1+ macrophages. Cell communication analysis revealed that the SPP1+ macrophages interacted with endothelial cells and had pro-angiogenic functions. There was an obvious communicative relationship between SPP1+ macrophages and endothelial cells via Vegfa–Vegfr1/Vegfr2, and SPP1+ macrophages interacted with other immune cells via specific ligand–receptor pairs, which might have contributed to their immunosuppressive function.DiscussionOur comprehensive exploration of the cystic echinococcosis ecosystem and the first discovery of SPP1+ macrophages with infection period specificity provide deeper insights into angiogenesis and the immune evasion mechanisms associated with later stages of infection

    Droop Control Strategy Incorporating Coupling Compensation and Virtual Impedance for Microgrid Application

    No full text

    Image_2_The single-cell landscape of cystic echinococcosis in different stages provided insights into endothelial and immune cell heterogeneity.tif

    No full text
    IntroductionHydatid cysts and angiogenesis are the key characteristics of cystic echinococcosis, with immune cells and endothelial cells mediating essential roles in disease progression. Recent single-cell analysis studies demonstrated immune cell infiltration after Echinococcus granulosus infection, highlighting the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of targeting certain cell types in the lesion microenvironment. However, more detailed immune mechanisms during different periods of E. granulosus infection were not elucidated.MethodsHerein, we characterized immune and endothelial cells from the liver samples of mice in different stages by single-cell RNA sequencing.ResultsWe profiled the transcriptomes of 45,199 cells from the liver samples of mice at 1, 3, and 6 months after infection (two replicates) and uninfected wild-type mice. The cells were categorized into 26 clusters with four distinct cell types: natural killer (NK)/T cells, B cells, myeloid cells, and endothelial cells. An SPP1+ macrophage subset with immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic functions was identified in the late infection stage. Single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering (SCENIC) analysis suggested that Cebpe, Runx3, and Rora were the key regulators of the SPP1+ macrophages. Cell communication analysis revealed that the SPP1+ macrophages interacted with endothelial cells and had pro-angiogenic functions. There was an obvious communicative relationship between SPP1+ macrophages and endothelial cells via Vegfa–Vegfr1/Vegfr2, and SPP1+ macrophages interacted with other immune cells via specific ligand–receptor pairs, which might have contributed to their immunosuppressive function.DiscussionOur comprehensive exploration of the cystic echinococcosis ecosystem and the first discovery of SPP1+ macrophages with infection period specificity provide deeper insights into angiogenesis and the immune evasion mechanisms associated with later stages of infection.</p

    Image_1_The single-cell landscape of cystic echinococcosis in different stages provided insights into endothelial and immune cell heterogeneity.tif

    No full text
    IntroductionHydatid cysts and angiogenesis are the key characteristics of cystic echinococcosis, with immune cells and endothelial cells mediating essential roles in disease progression. Recent single-cell analysis studies demonstrated immune cell infiltration after Echinococcus granulosus infection, highlighting the diagnostic and therapeutic potential of targeting certain cell types in the lesion microenvironment. However, more detailed immune mechanisms during different periods of E. granulosus infection were not elucidated.MethodsHerein, we characterized immune and endothelial cells from the liver samples of mice in different stages by single-cell RNA sequencing.ResultsWe profiled the transcriptomes of 45,199 cells from the liver samples of mice at 1, 3, and 6 months after infection (two replicates) and uninfected wild-type mice. The cells were categorized into 26 clusters with four distinct cell types: natural killer (NK)/T cells, B cells, myeloid cells, and endothelial cells. An SPP1+ macrophage subset with immunosuppressive and pro-angiogenic functions was identified in the late infection stage. Single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering (SCENIC) analysis suggested that Cebpe, Runx3, and Rora were the key regulators of the SPP1+ macrophages. Cell communication analysis revealed that the SPP1+ macrophages interacted with endothelial cells and had pro-angiogenic functions. There was an obvious communicative relationship between SPP1+ macrophages and endothelial cells via Vegfa–Vegfr1/Vegfr2, and SPP1+ macrophages interacted with other immune cells via specific ligand–receptor pairs, which might have contributed to their immunosuppressive function.DiscussionOur comprehensive exploration of the cystic echinococcosis ecosystem and the first discovery of SPP1+ macrophages with infection period specificity provide deeper insights into angiogenesis and the immune evasion mechanisms associated with later stages of infection.</p

    Neutralization against Omicron subvariants after BA.5/BF.7 breakthrough infection weakened as virus evolution and aging despite repeated prototype-based vaccination

    No full text
    Background: Omicron had swept the mainland China between December 2022 and January 2023, while SARS-CoV-2 still continued to evolve. To fully prepare for the next wave, it’s urgent to evaluate the humoral immune response post BA.5/BF.7 breakthrough infection against predominant sublineages among existing vaccination strategies and the elders.Method: This study enrolled a longitudinal young-adult cohort from 2/3-dose vaccination to 1 month after breakthrough infection, and an elder cohort at 1 month after breakthrough infection. Seral samples were collected and tested for humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 subvariants including WT, BA.2, BA.5, BF.7, BQ.1.1, CH.1.1, XBB.1.5.Results: BA.5/BF.7 breakthrough infection induced higher neutralization activity than solely vaccination in all SARS-CoV-2 strains, while the latest Omicron subvariants, BQ.1.1, CH.1.1, XBB.1.5, exhibited the strongest neutralization evasion ability. There was a negative correlation between age and humoral immune response in WT, BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5. Compared to non-vaccination groups, breakthrough infection in two-dose vaccination groups had significantly higher neutralizing antibody against WT, BA.2, BA.5, BF.7 but not to BQ.1.1, CH.1.1, XBB.1.5., while booster dose against the prototype prior-breakthrough would not further significantly enhance individual’s humoral responses against the latest Omicron subvariants.Conclusions: Newer variants manifest increasing immune evasion from neutralization and repeated prototype-based booster vaccines may not further enhance neutralizing antibody against emerging new variants. Older adults have lower levels of neutralizing antibody. Future vaccination strategies should aim to enhance effective neutralization to contemporary variants
    corecore