Diverse effects of RacV12 on cell transformation by Raf: partial inhibition of morphological transformation versus deregulation of cell cycle control

AbstractActivated Raf kinases and Rac GTPases were shown to cooperate in the oncogenic transformation of fibroblasts, which is characterised by the disassembly of the cellular actin cytoskeleton, a nearly complete loss of focal adhesion complexes and deregulated cell proliferation. This is surprising since the Rac GTPase induces actin structures and the adhesion of suspended cells to extracellular matrix proteins. NIH 3T3 cells expressing a hydroxytamoxifen-inducible oncogenic c-Raf-1–oestrogen receptor fusion protein (c-Raf-1-BxB-ERTM, N-BxB-ERTM cells) undergo morphological transformation upon stimulation of the Raf kinase. We show that treatment with the Rac, Rho and Cdc42 activating Escherichia coli toxin CNF1 or coexpression of an activated RacV12 mutant partially inhibits and reverses the disassembly of cellular actin structures and focal adhesion complexes by oncogenic Raf. Activation of the Rac GTPase restores actin structures and focal adhesion complexes at the cellular boundary, leading to spreading of the otherwise spindle-shaped Raf-transformed cells. Actin stress fibres, however, which are regulated by the function of the Rho GTPase, are disassembled by oncogenic Raf even in the presence of activated Rac and Rho. With respect to the RacV12-mediated spreading of Raf-transformed cells, we postulate an anti-oncogenic function of the activated Rac. Another feature of cell transformation is the deregulation of cell cycle control. NIH 3T3 cells expressing high levels of the c-Raf-1-BxB-ERTM protein undergo a cell cycle arrest upon stimulation of the oncogenic Raf kinase. Our results show that in N-BxB-ERTM-RacV12 cells the expression of the activated RacV12 mediates cell proliferation in the presence of high-intensity Raf signals and high levels of the Cdk inhibitor p21Cip1. These results indicate a pro-oncogenic function of the Rac GTPase with respect to the deregulation of cell cycle control

Inhibition of Rho A activity causes pemphigus skin blistering

The autoimmune blistering skin diseases pemphigus vulgaris (PV) and pemphigus foliaceus (PF) are mainly caused by autoantibodies against desmosomal cadherins. In this study, we provide evidence that PV–immunoglobulin G (IgG) and PF-IgG induce skin blistering by interference with Rho A signaling. In vitro, pemphigus IgG caused typical hallmarks of pemphigus pathogenesis such as epidermal blistering in human skin, cell dissociation, and loss of desmoglein 1 (Dsg 1)–mediated binding probed by laser tweezers. These changes were accompanied by interference with Rho A activation and reduction of Rho A activity. Pemphigus IgG–triggered keratinocyte dissociation and Rho A inactivation were p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase dependent. Specific activation of Rho A by cytotoxic necrotizing factor-y abolished all pemphigus-triggered effects, including keratin retraction and release of Dsg 3 from the cytoskeleton. These data demonstrate that Rho A is involved in the regulation of desmosomal adhesion, at least in part by maintaining the cytoskeletal anchorage of desmosomal proteins. This may open the possibility of pemphigus treatment with the epidermal application of Rho A agonists

Doxycycline versus prednisolone as an initial treatment strategy for bullous pemphigoid: a pragmatic non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a blistering skin disorder with increased mortality. We tested whether a strategy of starting treatment with doxycycline conveys acceptable short-term blister control whilst conferring long-term safety advantages over starting treatment with oral corticosteroids.Methods: Pragmatic multi-centre parallel-group randomised controlled trial of adults with BP (≥3 blisters ≥2 sites and linear basement membrane IgG/C3) plus economic evaluation. Participants were randomised to doxycycline (200 mg/day) or prednisolone (0·5 mg/kg/day). Localised adjuvant potent topical corticosteroids

Doxycycline versus prednisolone as an initial treatment strategy for bullous pemphigoid: a pragmatic non-inferiority randomised controlled trial

Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a blistering skin disorder with increased mortality. We tested whether a strategy of starting treatment with doxycycline conveys acceptable short-term blister control whilst conferring long-term safety advantages over starting treatment with oral corticosteroids. Methods: Pragmatic multi-centre parallel-group randomised controlled trial of adults with BP (≥3 blisters ≥2 sites and linear basement membrane IgG/C3) plus economic evaluation. Participants were randomised to doxycycline (200 mg/day) or prednisolone (0·5 mg/kg/day). Localised adjuvant potent topical corticosteroids (<30 g/week) was permitted weeks 1-3. The non-inferiority primary effectiveness outcome was the proportion of participants with ≤3 blisters at 6 weeks. We assumed that doxycycline would be 25% less effective than corticosteroids with a 37% acceptable margin of noninferiority. The primary safety outcome was the proportion with severe, life-threatening or fatal treatment-related adverse events by 52 weeks. Analysis used a regression model adjusting for baseline disease severity, age and Karnofsky score, with missing data imputed. Results: 132 patients were randomised to doxycycline and 121 to prednisolone from 54 UK and 7 German dermatology centres. Mean age was 77·7 years and 68.4% had moderate to severe baseline disease. For those starting doxycycline, 83/112 (74·1%) had ≤3 blisters at 6 weeks compared with 92/101 (91·1%) for prednisolone, a difference of 18·6% favouring prednisolone (upper limit of 90% CI, 26·1%, within the predefined 37% margin). Related severe, life-threatening and fatal events at 52 weeks were 18·5% for those starting doxycycline and 36·6% for prednisolone (mITT analysis), an adjusted difference of 19·0% (95% CI, 7·9%, 30·1%, p=0·001). Conclusions: A strategy of starting BP patients on doxycycline is non-inferior to standard treatment with oral prednisolone for short-term blister control and significantly safer long-term

Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factors (CNFs)−A Growing Toxin Family

toxin

Bacterial Toxins for Cancer Therapy

Several pathogenic bacteria secrete toxins to inhibit the immune system of the infected organism. Frequently, they catalyze a covalent modification of specific proteins. Thereby, they block production and/or secretion of antibodies or cytokines. Moreover, they disable migration of macrophages and disturb the barrier function of epithelia. In most cases, these toxins are extremely effective enzymes with high specificity towards their cellular substrates, which are often central signaling molecules. Moreover, they encompass the capacity to enter mammalian cells and to modify their substrates in the cytosol. A few molecules, at least of some toxins, are sufficient to change the cellular morphology and function of a cell or even kill a cell. Since many of those toxins are well studied concerning molecular mechanisms, cellular receptors, uptake routes, and structures, they are now widely used to analyze or to influence specific signaling pathways of mammalian cells. Here, we review the development of immunotoxins and targeted toxins for the treatment of a disease that is still hard to treat: cancer

Lu/BCAM Adhesion Glycoprotein Is a Receptor for Escherichia coli Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 (CNF1)

The Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 (CNF1) is a protein toxin which is a major virulence factor of pathogenic Escherichia coli strains. Here, we identified the Lutheran (Lu) adhesion glycoprotein/basal cell adhesion molecule (BCAM) as cellular receptor for CNF1 by co-precipitation of cell surface molecules with tagged toxin. The CNF1-Lu/BCAM interaction was verified by direct protein-protein interaction analysis and competition studies. These studies revealed amino acids 720 to 1014 of CNF1 as the binding site for Lu/BCAM. We suggest two cell interaction sites in CNF1: first the N-terminus, which binds to p37LRP as postulated before. Binding of CNF1 to p37LRP seems to be crucial for the toxin's action. However, it is not sufficient for the binding of CNF1 to the cell surface. A region directly adjacent to the catalytic domain is a high affinity interaction site for Lu/BCAM. We found Lu/BCAM to be essential for the binding of CNF1 to cells. Cells deficient in Lu/BCAM but expressing p37LRP could not bind labeled CNF1. Therefore, we conclude that LRP and Lu/BCAM are both required for toxin action but with different functions. Author Summary We study a crucial virulence factor produced by pathogenic Escherichia coli strains, the Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 (CNF1). More than 80% of urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are counted among the most common bacterial infections of humans, are caused by Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains. We and others elucidated the molecular mechanism of the E. coli toxin CNF1. It constitutively activates Rho GTPases by a direct covalent modification. The toxin enters mammalian cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis. Here, we identified the protein receptor for CNF1 by co-precipitation of cell surface molecules with the tagged toxin and subsequent Maldi-TOF analysis. We identified the Lutheran (Lu) adhesion glycoprotein/basal cell adhesion molecule (BCAM) as receptor for CNF1 and located its interaction site to the C-terminal part of the toxin. We performed direct protein-protein interaction analysis and competition studies. Moreover, cells deficient in Lu/BCAM could not bind labeled CNF1. The identification of a toxin's cellular receptor and receptor binding region is an important task for understanding the pathogenic function of the toxin and, moreover, to make the toxin accessible for its use as a cellbiological and pharmacological tool, for example for the generation of immunotoxins

Étude physico-chimique du procédé de dispersion des poudres libres et agglomérées en milieu liquide

La dispersion de poudres en milieu liquide est un procédé largement utilisé dans l'industrie et dans la vie de tous les jours. Il s'agit disperser rapidement et de façon homogène une poudre dans un liquide où la qualité de la dispersion va définir la qualité du produit final. Afin d'optimiser le procédé, l'influence des paramètres améliorant et limitant la dispersion des poudres en milieu liquide est étudiée. Le processus de dispersion peut être scindé en trois étapes, adhésion, immersion, et étalement, pour mieux appréhender la mise en jeu de différents aspects énergétiques. Ceux-ci pourraient s'exprimer en fonction de l'énergie interfaciale solide-liquide, l'énergie de surface du solide et l'énergie d'agitation à mettre en oeuvre pour disperser. Pour caractériser la dispersion un capteur à fibre optique a été utilisé. Cette technique a permis de déterminer l'influence de différents paramètres : granulométrie, surface spécifique et concentration de particules, tension de surface...The dispersion of powders in liquids is a process widely used in industry and in every day life. The requirement to disperse a powder in a liquid rapidly and uniformly where the quality of the dispersion will define the quality of the final product. The optimisation of the process requires knowledge of the influence of the parameters on the kinetics of dispersion. To better understand the different energies involved, the process of dispersion may be divided into three stages : adhesion, immersion, and spreading. These stages can be examined as a function of the solid/liquid interfacial energy, the surface energy of the solid and the energy required to stir the liquid. A experimental device, with en optical fibre is used to characterise the dispersion. This technique allows the determination of the effects of various parameters on the operation.TOULOUSE-ENSIACET (315552325) / SudocALBI-ENSTIMAC (810042301) / SudocSudocFranceF