Challenges to Authority: Understanding Critiques of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

I. Climate Change and The Science-Policy Divide In response to a growing body of research pointing to human-induced warming of Earth’s climate, and in recognition of the potentially sweeping impacts of climate change for humanity, the world’s governments launched the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1988. The IPCC is a consultative body of volunteer scientists charged with periodically assessing the state of knowledge in the many areas of research relating to climate change, including both the physical and social sciences. Given the scope of these assessments, the IPCC has come to be viewed as the singular authority on climate change. The IPCC derives this authority from the credibility of its scientists, the comprehensive review that its assessments undergo, and the consensus that the assessments require from a broad range of participants, including governments and civil society organizations. The IPCC has been object of intense criticism since its creation, largely because of the considerable implications of climate change for public policy. The tension between the IPCC and its critics serve as a clear example of the uneasy relationship between science, the authority it aims to represent, and the rest of society

Bringing traits back in the equation : A roadmap to understand species redistribution

Acknowledgments This research is a product of the BIOSHIFTS working group funded by the synthesis center (CESAB) of the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB; www.fondationbiodiversite.fr) and the project FRAGSHIFTS funded by the Ministry of Ecological Transition (MTE), French Office for Biodiversity (OFB), and the French Foundation for Research on Biodiversity (FRB). We thank Holly Embke and two reviewers (including Tom Luhring) for their time and constructive comments that have improved the initial submission.Peer reviewe

Temporal changes in avian community composition in lowland conifer habitats at the southern edge of the boreal zone in the Adirondack Park, NY.

Climate change represents one of the most significant threats to human and wildlife communities on the planet. Populations at range margins or transitions between biomes can be particularly instructive for observing changes in biological communities that may be driven by climate change. Avian communities in lowland boreal habitats in the Adirondack Park, located at the North American boreal-temperate ecotone, have been the focus of long-term monitoring efforts since 2007. By documenting long-term changes in community structure and composition, such datasets provide an opportunity to understand how boreal species are responding differently to climate change, and which habitat characteristics may be best able to retain boreal avian communities. We examined three specific questions in order to address how well current biological communities in Adirondack boreal wetland habitats are being maintained in a changing climate: (1) how do trends in occupancy vary across species, and what guilds or characteristics are associated with increasing or decreasing occupancy? (2) how is avian community composition changing differently across sites, and (3) what distinguishes sites which are retaining boreal birds to a higher degree than other sites? Our analysis revealed that (1) boreal species appear to exhibit the largest changes in occupancy among our study locations as compared to the larger avian community, (2) dynamics of community change are not uniform across sites and habitat structure may play an important role in driving observed changes, and (3) the particular characteristics of large open peatlands may allow them to serve as refugia for boreal species in the context of climate change

Relative contribution of climate and non-climate drivers in determining dynamic rates of boreal birds at the edge of their range.

The Adirondack Park in New York State contains a unique and limited distribution of boreal ecosystem types, providing habitat for a number of birds at the southern edge of their range. Species are projected to shift poleward in a warming climate, and the limited boreal forest of the Adirondacks is expected to undergo significant change in response to rising temperatures and changing precipitation patterns. Here we expand upon a previous analysis to examine changes in occupancy patterns for eight species of boreal birds over a decade (2007-2016), and we assess the relative contribution of climate and non-climate drivers in determining colonization and extinction rates. Our analysis identifies patterns of declining occupancy for six of eight species, including some declines which appear to have become more pronounced since a prior analysis. Although non-climate drivers such as wetland area, connectivity, and human footprint continue to influence colonization and extinction rates, we find that for most species, occupancy patterns are best described by climate drivers. We modeled both average and annual temperature and precipitation characteristics and find stronger support for species' responses to average climate conditions, rather than interannual climate variability. In general, boreal birds appear most likely to colonize sites that have lower levels of precipitation and a high degree of connectivity, and they tend to persist in sites that are warmer in the breeding season and have low and less variable precipitation in the winter. It is likely that these responses reflect interactions between broader habitat conditions and temperature and precipitation variables. Indirect climate influences as mediated through altered species interactions may also be important in this context. Given climate change predictions for both temperature and precipitation, it is likely that habitat structural changes over the long term may alter these relationships in the future

Decoupling direct and indirect effects of temperature on decomposition

Functional changes to biotic communities arise in response to changes in the physical environment, often with profound implications for biogeochemical processes. Decomposition is regulated both by abiotic conditions (e.g. temperature and moisture) and by the biotic communities that mediate this process (e.g. bacteria and fungi). Given strong evolutionary trade-offs between tolerating stressful climatic conditions and competing under favorable conditions, past climate may indirectly affect decomposition rates by structuring the functional composition of microbial communities. In a controlled laboratory setting using samples from the Yale Myers Forest in northeast Connecticut USA, we tested how exposure to 15 °C, 20 °C, and 25 °C for three months shaped characteristics of wood-degrading fungal communities. We then measured how this indirect effect influenced contemporary decomposition rates during a second three-month incubation. As expected, contemporary effects of temperature had a strong influence on decomposition rates. Yet the effects of previous temperature exposure were also evident: fungal communities previously exposed to warmer conditions consistently decomposed wood faster than communities previously exposed to cooler conditions, regardless of the contemporary temperature regime. Across all contemporary temperatures, communities previously warmed to 20 °C and 25 °C degraded 1.08 and 1.12 times more wood, respectively, than communities previously warmed to 15 °C. The indirect effects of previous temperature were mediated by a larger fungal biomass in inocula sourced from warmer previous temperatures, as well as by shifts in functional rates independent of biomass. Overall, the relative influence of contemporary temperature was less than expected: the combined effect of the functional shift and fungal biomass – both a product of previous temperature – was nearly two-thirds that of contemporary temperature. Our findings demonstrate the dual role of climate in determining a fundamental ecosystem process, both directly via contemporary temperature and indirectly through the effects of previous temperature exposure on microbial activity

Bringing traits back into the equation: A roadmap to understand species redistribution

Ecological and evolutionary theories have proposed that species traits should be important in mediating species responses to contemporary climate change; yet, empirical evidence has so far provided mixed evidence for the role of behavioral, life history, or ecological characteristics in facilitating or hindering species range shifts. As such, the utility of trait-based approaches to predict species redistribution under climate change has been called into question. We develop the perspective, supported by evidence, that trait variation, if used carefully can have high potential utility, but that past analyses have in many cases failed to identify an explanatory value for traits by not fully embracing the complexity of species range shifts. First, we discuss the relevant theory linking species traits to range shift processes at the leading (expansion) and trailing (contraction) edges of species distributions and highlight the need to clarify the mechanistic basis of trait-based approaches. Second, we provide a brief overview of range shift-trait studies and identify new opportunities for trait integration that consider range-specific processes and intraspecific variability. Third, we explore the circumstances under which environmental and biotic context dependencies are likely to affect our ability to identify the contribution of species traits to range shift processes. Finally, we propose that revealing the role of traits in shaping species redistribution may likely require accounting for methodological variation arising from the range shift estimation process as well as addressing existing functional, geographical, and phylogenetic biases. We provide a series of considerations for more effectively integrating traits as well as extrinsic and methodological factors into species redistribution research. Together, these analytical approaches promise stronger mechanistic and predictive understanding that can help society mitigate and adapt to the effects of climate change on biodiversity