Automatic generation of simplified weakest preconditions for integrity constraint verification

Given a constraint $c$ assumed to hold on a database $B$ and an update $u$ to be performed on $B$, we address the following question: will $c$ still hold after $u$ is performed? When $B$ is a relational database, we define a confluent terminating rewriting system which, starting from $c$ and $u$, automatically derives a simplified weakest precondition $wp(c,u)$ such that, whenever $B$ satisfies $wp(c,u)$, then the updated database $u(B)$ will satisfy $c$, and moreover $wp(c,u)$ is simplified in the sense that its computation depends only upon the instances of $c$ that may be modified by the update. We then extend the definition of a simplified $wp(c,u)$ to the case of deductive databases; we prove it using fixpoint induction

On relating CTL to Datalog

CTL is the dominant temporal specification language in practice mainly due to the fact that it admits model checking in linear time. Logic programming and the database query language Datalog are often used as an implementation platform for logic languages. In this paper we present the exact relation between CTL and Datalog and moreover we build on this relation and known efficient algorithms for CTL to obtain efficient algorithms for fragments of stratified Datalog. The contributions of this paper are: a) We embed CTL into STD which is a proper fragment of stratified Datalog. Moreover we show that STD expresses exactly CTL -- we prove that by embedding STD into CTL. Both embeddings are linear. b) CTL can also be embedded to fragments of Datalog without negation. We define a fragment of Datalog with the successor build-in predicate that we call TDS and we embed CTL into TDS in linear time. We build on the above relations to answer open problems of stratified Datalog. We prove that query evaluation is linear and that containment and satisfiability problems are both decidable. The results presented in this paper are the first for fragments of stratified Datalog that are more general than those containing only unary EDBs.Comment: 34 pages, 1 figure (file .eps

Tree inclusions in windows and slices

$P$ is an embedded subtree of $T$ if $P$ can be obtained by deleting some nodes from $T$: if a node $v$ is deleted, all edges adjacent to $v$ are also deleted, and outgoing edges are replaced by edges going from the parent of $v$ (if it exists) to the children of $v$. Deciding whether $P$ is an embedded subtree of $T$ is known to be NP-complete. Given two trees (a target $T$ and a pattern $P$) and a natural number $w$, we address two problems: 1. counting the number of windows of $T$ having height exactly $w$ and containing pattern $P$ as an embedded subtree, and 2. counting the number of slices of $T$ having height exactly $w$ and containing pattern $P$ as an embedded subtree

Complexity of Monadic inf-datalog. Application to temporal logic.

In [11] we defined Inf-Datalog and characterized the fragments of Monadic inf-Datalog that have the same expressive power as Modal Logic (resp. $CTL$, alternation-free Modal $\mu$-calculus and Modal $\mu$-calculus). We study here the time and space complexity of evaluation of Monadic inf-Datalog programs on finite models. We deduce a new unified proof that model checking has 1. linear data and program complexities (both in time and space) for $CTL$ and alternation-free Modal $\mu$-calculus, and 2. linear-space (data and program) complexities, linear-time program complexity and polynomial-time data complexity for $L\mu_k$ (Modal $\mu$-calculus with fixed alternation-depth at most $k$).

A unifying theorem for algebraic semantics and dynamic logics

AbstractA unified single proof is given which implies theorems in such diverse fields as continuous algebras of algebraic semantics, dynamic algebras of logics of programs, and program verification methods for total correctness. The proof concerns ultraproducts and diagonalization

An automata characterisation for multiple context-free languages

We introduce tree stack automata as a new class of automata with storage and identify a restricted form of tree stack automata that recognises exactly the multiple context-free languages.Comment: This is an extended version of a paper with the same title accepted at the 20th International Conference on Developments in Language Theory (DLT 2016