35 research outputs found

    The Functional Consequences of Variation in Transcription Factor Binding

    Full text link
    One goal of human genetics is to understand how the information for precise and dynamic gene expression programs is encoded in the genome. The interactions of transcription factors (TFs) with DNA regulatory elements clearly play an important role in determining gene expression outputs, yet the regulatory logic underlying functional transcription factor binding is poorly understood. Many studies have focused on characterizing the genomic locations of TF binding, yet it is unclear to what extent TF binding at any specific locus has functional consequences with respect to gene expression output. To evaluate the context of functional TF binding we knocked down 59 TFs and chromatin modifiers in one HapMap lymphoblastoid cell line. We then identified genes whose expression was affected by the knockdowns. We intersected the gene expression data with transcription factor binding data (based on ChIP-seq and DNase-seq) within 10 kb of the transcription start sites of expressed genes. This combination of data allowed us to infer functional TF binding. On average, 14.7% of genes bound by a factor were differentially expressed following the knockdown of that factor, suggesting that most interactions between TF and chromatin do not result in measurable changes in gene expression levels of putative target genes. We found that functional TF binding is enriched in regulatory elements that harbor a large number of TF binding sites, at sites with predicted higher binding affinity, and at sites that are enriched in genomic regions annotated as active enhancers.Comment: 30 pages, 6 figures (7 supplemental figures and 6 supplemental tables available upon request to [email protected]). Submitted to PLoS Genetic

    The combination of a genome-wide association study of lymphocyte count and analysis of gene expression data reveals novel asthma candidate genes

    Get PDF
    Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified a number of novel genetic associations with complex human diseases. In spite of these successes, results from GWAS generally explain only a small proportion of disease heritability, an observation termed the ‘missing heritability problem’. Several sources for the missing heritability have been proposed, including the contribution of many common variants with small individual effect sizes, which cannot be reliably found using the standard GWAS approach. The goal of our study was to explore a complimentary approach, which combines GWAS results with functional data in order to identify novel genetic associations with small effect sizes. To do so, we conducted a GWAS for lymphocyte count, a physiologic quantitative trait associated with asthma, in 462 Hutterites. In parallel, we performed a genome-wide gene expression study in lymphoblastoid cell lines from 96 Hutterites. We found significant support for genetic associations using the GWAS data when we considered variants near the 193 genes whose expression levels across individuals were most correlated with lymphocyte counts. Interestingly, these variants are also enriched with signatures of an association with asthma susceptibility, an observation we were able to replicate. The associated loci include genes previously implicated in asthma susceptibility as well as novel candidate genes enriched for functions related to T cell receptor signaling and adenosine triphosphate synthesis. Our results, therefore, establish a new set of asthma susceptibility candidate genes. More generally, our observations support the notion that many loci of small effects influence variation in lymphocyte count and asthma susceptibility

    Integrative genomics approaches to understanding the role of gene regulation in human evolution, disease, and cellular networks: A triptych

    No full text
    Human development and health involves the complex and coordinated regulation of gene expression across diverse tissues. Gene regulation is therefore an essential process in human biology. In the field of human genetics, this has only become more apparent as genomic technologies have made genome-wide surveys of genetic variation underlying human traits possible. In my thesis work, I studied the impact of variation in gene regulation on human traits from three distinct perspectives of human genetics. I first examined the contribution of gene regulation to human disease susceptibility by combining gene expression data with a genome-wide association study to identify novel asthma susceptibility candidate genes. I then studied the effects of depleting specific transcription factors from the cell on downstream gene expression by incorporating gene expression data (following cellular depletion of those factors) with genomic transcription factor binding data. Finally, I considered the role of gene regulation in human evolution by integrating RNA-seq data collected in human, chimpanzee, and rhesus macaque lymphoblastoid cell lines with promoter reporter assays conducted in the same lines. Throughout this work, I have synthesized multiple genomic data sets and multiple distinct sub-disciplines of human genetics in order to arrive at a unified view of the role of gene regulation in determining human traits

    Functional Transcription Factor Binding Associated with More Overall Factor Binding at Target Genes

    No full text
    <p>These figures were generated in response to comments on a manuscript we had posted to arXiv and Haldane's Sieve.  The paper is now published by PLoS Genetics.</p

    arXiv Supplemental Figure 2

    No full text
    <p>In this figure, genes are binned into 20 equally sized bins based on the amount of transcription factor binding in the regulatory region of the gene (x-axis). For each bin, the fraction of genes that are differentially expressed in at least 1 knockdown (black), at least 2 knockdowns (red), at least 5 knockdowns (green), at least 10 knockdowns (blue), or at least 20 knockdowns (light blue) is calculated.  Genes with more overall binding are more likely to be differentially expressed in knockdown experiments.</p

    arXiv Supplemental Figure 1

    No full text
    <p>In this figure, the distribution of the number of binding events for bound genes differentially expressed in the knockdown experiment  ("functionally bound") vs bound genes NOT differentially expressed in the knockdown ("non-functionally bound") is displayed for each knockdown experiment.  The boxplots are sorted by the overall fraction of bound genes that are differentially expressed.  Experiments with more functional binding have more overall binding.</p

    ASHG 2013 Poster - The Functional Consequences of Variation in Transcription Factor Binding

    No full text
    <p>Poster presented at ASHG 2013 in Boston on work that was subsequently published in PLoS Genetics.</p
    corecore