A semi-induced subgraph characterization of upper domination perfect graphs

Let β(G) and Γ(G) be the independence number and the upper domination number of a graph G, respectively. A graph G is called Γ-perfect if β(H) = Γ(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. The class of Γ-perfect graphs generalizes such well-known classes of graphs as strongly perfect graphs, absorbantly perfect graphs, and circular arc graphs. In this article, we present a characterization of Γ-perfect graphs in terms of forbidden semi-induced subgraphs. Key roles in the characterization are played by the odd prism and the even Möbius ladder, where the prism and the Möbius ladder are well-known 3-regular graphs [2]. Using the semi-induced subgraph characterization, we obtain a characterization of K 1.3-free Γ-perfect graphs in terms of forbidden induced subgraphs. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Bi-induced sub graphs and stability number

We define a 2-parametric hierarchy CLAP (m, n) of bi-hereditary classes of graphs, and show that a maximum stable set can be found in polynomial time within each class CLAP (m, n). The classes can be recognized in polynomial time

Discrepancy and Signed Domination in Graphs and Hypergraphs

For a graph G, a signed domination function of G is a two-colouring of the vertices of G with colours +1 and -1 such that the closed neighbourhood of every vertex contains more +1's than -1's. This concept is closely related to combinatorial discrepancy theory as shown by Fueredi and Mubayi [J. Combin. Theory, Ser. B 76 (1999) 223-239]. The signed domination number of G is the minimum of the sum of colours for all vertices, taken over all signed domination functions of G. In this paper, we present new upper and lower bounds for the signed domination number. These new bounds improve a number of known results.Comment: 12 page

The domination parameters of cubic graphs

Let ir(G), γ(G), i(G), β0(G), Γ(G) and IR(G) be the irredundance number, the domination number, the independent domination number, the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number of a graph G, respectively. In this paper we show that for any nonnegative integers k 1, k 2, k 3, k 4, k 5 there exists a cubic graph G satisfying the following conditions: γ(G) - ir(G) ≤ k 1, i(G) - γ(G) ≤ k 2, β0(G) - i(G) > k 3, Γ(G) - β0(G) - k 4, and IR(G) - Γ(G) - k 5. This result settles a problem posed in [9]. © Springer-Verlag 2005

Independent domination in hereditary classes

AbstractWe investigate Independent Domination Problem within hereditary classes of graphs. Boliac and Lozin [Independent domination in finitely defined classes of graphs, Theoret. Comput. Sci. 301 (1–3) (2003) 271–284] proved some sufficient conditions for Independent Domination Problem to be NP-complete within finitely defined hereditary classes of graphs. They posed a question whether the conditions are also necessary. We show that the conditions are not necessary, since Independent Domination Problem is NP-hard within 2P3-free graphs.Moreover, we show that the problem remains NP-hard for a new hereditary class of graphs, called hereditary 3-satgraphs. We characterize hereditary 3-satgraphs in terms of forbidden induced subgraph. As corollaries, we prove that Independent Domination Problem is NP-hard within the class of all 2P3-free perfect graphs and for K1,5-free weakly chordal graphs.Finally, we compare complexity of Independent Domination Problem with that of Independent Set Problem for a hierarchy of hereditary classes recently proposed by Hammer and Zverovich [Construction of maximal stable sets with k-extensions, Combin. Probab. Comput. 13 (2004) 1–8]. For each class in the hierarchy, a maximum independent set can be found in polynomial time, and the hierarchy covers all graphs. However, our characterization of hereditary 3-satgraphs implies that Independent Domination Problem is NP-hard for almost all classes in the hierarchy. This fact supports a conjecture that Independent Domination is harder than Independent Set Problem within hereditary classes

Two short proofs of the bounded case of S.B. Rao's degree sequence conjecture

S. B. Rao conjectured that graphic sequences are well-quasi-ordered under an inclusion based on induced subgraphs. This conjecture has now been settled completely by M. Chudnovsky and P. Seymour. One part of the proof proves the result for the bounded case, a result proved independently by C. J. Altomare. We give two short proofs of the bounded case of S. B. Rao's conjecture. Both the proofs use the fact that if the number of entries in an integer sequence (with even sum) is much larger than its highest term, then it is necessarily graphic.Comment: 4 page