Does Business Group Matter for the Relationship between Green Innovation and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Green innovation has been an important approach for firms to achieve sustainable development in recent years; however, empirical studies on the relationship between green innovation and corporate performance have delivered mixed results. In particular, business groups (BG), which are a critical organizational form in many economies and are proven to have unique advantages for conducting green innovation, have attracted less scholarly attention. Therefore, in this study, we adopt the perspective of a business group and investigate how green innovation by BG-affiliated firms affects their financial performance, and we also explore the moderating effect of BG’s internal supply chain partnership. Based on a sample of 202 listed manufacturing enterprises in China from 2013 and 2017, the research results show that green innovation significantly improves the financial performance of firms, and this positive effect is more prominent in BG-affiliated firms than in non-BG firms. Further research found that BG-affiliated firms’ supply chain (suppliers and customers) concentration and trust positively moderate the relationship between green innovation and financial performance. This research concerns the particularity of business groups’ green innovation practices in China, which not only contributes to the research on the effect of BG’s green innovation on corporate performance in an emerging market context but also deepens our understanding of the role of its internal supply chain partnership from the perspective of concentration and trust

Does Business Group Matter for the Relationship between Green Innovation and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Green innovation has been an important approach for firms to achieve sustainable development in recent years; however, empirical studies on the relationship between green innovation and corporate performance have delivered mixed results. In particular, business groups (BG), which are a critical organizational form in many economies and are proven to have unique advantages for conducting green innovation, have attracted less scholarly attention. Therefore, in this study, we adopt the perspective of a business group and investigate how green innovation by BG-affiliated firms affects their financial performance, and we also explore the moderating effect of BG’s internal supply chain partnership. Based on a sample of 202 listed manufacturing enterprises in China from 2013 and 2017, the research results show that green innovation significantly improves the financial performance of firms, and this positive effect is more prominent in BG-affiliated firms than in non-BG firms. Further research found that BG-affiliated firms’ supply chain (suppliers and customers) concentration and trust positively moderate the relationship between green innovation and financial performance. This research concerns the particularity of business groups’ green innovation practices in China, which not only contributes to the research on the effect of BG’s green innovation on corporate performance in an emerging market context but also deepens our understanding of the role of its internal supply chain partnership from the perspective of concentration and trust

Green Governance and International Business Strategies of Emerging Economies’ Multinational Enterprises: A Multiple-Case Study of Chinese Firms in Pollution-Intensive Industries

With the global consensus on the need for sustainability practices, green governance has attracted increasing attention from international business (IB) scholars and multinational enterprise (MNE) managers. In this study, we propose a more fine-grained framework of the green governance context along two dimensions: foreign direct investment (FDI) policy and environmental regulation. Then, we examine the framework using cluster analysis. On the basis of a multiple-case study comprising 11 Chinese MNEs in pollution-intensive industries operating in four different green governance contexts, we conclude that (1) the green governance context is a significant factor in MNEs’ global location choices and is an important driving force behind MNEs’ response patterns; (2) environmental capabilities enable MNEs to surmount a host country’s environmental entry barrier and facilitate wider global business deployment; (3) technological capabilities increase MNEs’ competitive edge and allow them to better harness a host country’s growth opportunities; (4) there are four types of green governance response patterns, and the details of the proposed classification structure and its validation are presented; and (5) both strict environmental regulation and friendly FDI policy can positively influence MNEs’ adoption of more active response patterns, and greater availability of environmental and technological capabilities does not affect MNEs’ environmental commitment. This study contributes to the international strategy-capability-environment alignment of emerging economies’ multinational enterprises (EMNEs) in different green governance contexts

Does status stability benefit or hurt team creativity? the roles of status legitimacy and team conflict

Status stability, which refers to the stability of team members’ relative status levels, has a profound effect on team effectiveness, but this effect may be either constructive or destructive; the literature has failed to reach consensus on this topic. To reconcile two contradictory views based on differentiating between different types of conflict, we constructed a comprehensive theoretical model of the mechanism underlying the effect of status stability; this model features relationship conflict and task conflict as mediators, status legitimacy as a moderator, and team creativity as an outcome variable. We also proposed four hypotheses on the basis of theoretical analysis. In this study, we used SPSS 23.0, AMOS 24.0 and R software to conduct empirical analysis and testing of 369 valid questionnaires collected from 83 teams using a two-stage measurement method. The results revealed that status stability negatively affects team creativity via task conflict and positively affects team creativity via relationship conflict. However, under the influence of status legitimacy, the negative effect is restrained, while the positive effect is enhanced. This study thus expands the research on the process mechanism and boundary conditions associated with status stability, and can serve as a useful reference for the design of the status structure of modern enterprises