Global disparities in surgeons’ workloads, academic engagement and rest periods: the on-calL shIft fOr geNEral SurgeonS (LIONESS) study

: The workload of general surgeons is multifaceted, encompassing not only surgical procedures but also a myriad of other responsibilities. From April to May 2023, we conducted a CHERRIES-compliant internet-based survey analyzing clinical practice, academic engagement, and post-on-call rest. The questionnaire featured six sections with 35 questions. Statistical analysis used Chi-square tests, ANOVA, and logistic regression (SPSS® v. 28). The survey received a total of 1.046 responses (65.4%). Over 78.0% of responders came from Europe, 65.1% came from a general surgery unit; 92.8% of European and 87.5% of North American respondents were involved in research, compared to 71.7% in Africa. Europe led in publishing research studies (6.6 ± 8.6 yearly). Teaching involvement was high in North America (100%) and Africa (91.7%). Surgeons reported an average of 6.7 ± 4.9 on-call shifts per month, with European and North American surgeons experiencing 6.5 ± 4.9 and 7.8 ± 4.1 on-calls monthly, respectively. African surgeons had the highest on-call frequency (8.7 ± 6.1). Post-on-call, only 35.1% of respondents received a day off. Europeans were most likely (40%) to have a day off, while African surgeons were least likely (6.7%). On the adjusted multivariable analysis HDI (Human Development Index) (aOR 1.993) hospital capacity > 400 beds (aOR 2.423), working in a specialty surgery unit (aOR 2.087), and making the on-call in-house (aOR 5.446), significantly predicted the likelihood of having a day off after an on-call shift. Our study revealed critical insights into the disparities in workload, access to research, and professional opportunities for surgeons across different continents, underscored by the HDI

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Obstetric outcomes and prognostic factors of lupus pregnancies

To determine maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancies with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), and to evaluate the prognostic factors that may affect obstetrical outcomes

Prenatal Diagnosis of Left Coronary Artery to Right Ventricle Fistula

Prenatal diagnosis of a congenital coronary artery fistula between the left coronary artery and the right ventricle was established at 28 weeks of gestation. Hydrops fetalis developed during follow-up and the baby died on the first day after delivery. It is rare for coronary artery fistulas to become symptomatic during fetal life. (c) 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Ultrasound, 43:129-131, 201

Diagnosis and outcome of pregnancies with prenatally diagnosed fetal dextrocardia

Objective: To evaluate the incidence, associated cardiac and extracardiac malformations and clinical outcome of fetuses with dextrocardia

Aortic arch anomalies detected in foetal life by echocardiography

Aortic arch anomalies refer to congenital malformations of position or branching pattern of the aortic arch. To-date, only a few small studies have documented prenatal detection of aortic arch anomalies. In this article, we share our experience in detecting aortic arch anomalies. Foetal echocardiograms, clinic and genetic histories of 33 patients who had been diagnosed with aortic arch anomaly from 2007 to 2015 were reviewed. In 15 patients, right aortic arch with mirror image branching; in 13 patients, right aortic arch with left ductus arteriosus and aberrant left subclavian artery; in three patients, left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery; in one patient bilateral ductus and right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and in one patient double aortic arch were detected. In a patient with isolated right aortic arch, 22q11 microdeletion had been revealed. Given this data, we strongly suggest foetal karyotype analysis when aortic arch anomalies are identified.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject: The data about the prenatal diagnosis of aortic arch anomalies are limited.What the results of this study add: In our study, 653 patients were examined by foetal echocardiography during the study period. Thirty three patients who had been diagnosed with aortic arch anomaly prenatally and confirmed after delivery were enrolled in the study. In 15 patients, right aortic arch with mirror image branching; in 13 patients, right aortic arch with left ductus arteriosus and aberrant left subclavian artery; in three patients, left aortic arch with aberrant right subclavian artery; in one patient bilateral ductus and right aortic arch with aberrant left subclavian artery and in one patient double aortic arch were detected. Trisomy 18 was detected in the patient with bilateral ductus arteriosus and Di George syndrome (22q11 microdeletion) was determined in two patients with right aortic arch. While in the first patient, there were no other intracardiac anomalies; in the second patient with 22q11 microdeletion, Fallot tetralogy accompanied the right aortic arch.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: This results showed that aortic arch anomalies can be associated with genetic anomalies even when they are found without other congenital heart disease. Given these data, we strongly suggest foetal karyotype analysis and genetic testing when aortic arch anomalies are identified