Obeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Background Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a common type of chronic liver disease that can lead to cirrhosis. Obeticholic acid, a farnesoid X receptor agonist, has been shown to improve the histological features of NASH. Here we report results from a planned interim analysis of an ongoing, phase 3 study of obeticholic acid for NASH. Methods In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adult patients with definite NASH,non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score of at least 4, and fibrosis stages F2–F3, or F1 with at least oneaccompanying comorbidity, were randomly assigned using an interactive web response system in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive oral placebo, obeticholic acid 10 mg, or obeticholic acid 25 mg daily. Patients were excluded if cirrhosis, other chronic liver disease, elevated alcohol consumption, or confounding conditions were present. The primary endpointsfor the month-18 interim analysis were fibrosis improvement (≥1 stage) with no worsening of NASH, or NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis, with the study considered successful if either primary endpoint was met. Primary analyses were done by intention to treat, in patients with fibrosis stage F2–F3 who received at least one dose of treatment and reached, or would have reached, the month 18 visit by the prespecified interim analysis cutoff date. The study also evaluated other histological and biochemical markers of NASH and fibrosis, and safety. This study is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02548351, and EudraCT, 20150-025601-6. Findings Between Dec 9, 2015, and Oct 26, 2018, 1968 patients with stage F1–F3 fibrosis were enrolled and received at least one dose of study treatment; 931 patients with stage F2–F3 fibrosis were included in the primary analysis (311 in the placebo group, 312 in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 308 in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group). The fibrosis improvement endpoint was achieved by 37 (12%) patients in the placebo group, 55 (18%) in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group (p=0·045), and 71 (23%) in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group (p=0·0002). The NASH resolution endpoint was not met (25 [8%] patients in the placebo group, 35 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group [p=0·18], and 36 [12%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group [p=0·13]). In the safety population (1968 patients with fibrosis stages F1–F3), the most common adverse event was pruritus (123 [19%] in the placebo group, 183 [28%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 336 [51%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group); incidence was generally mild to moderate in severity. The overall safety profile was similar to that in previous studies, and incidence of serious adverse events was similar across treatment groups (75 [11%] patients in the placebo group, 72 [11%] in the obeticholic acid 10 mg group, and 93 [14%] in the obeticholic acid 25 mg group). Interpretation Obeticholic acid 25 mg significantly improved fibrosis and key components of NASH disease activity among patients with NASH. The results from this planned interim analysis show clinically significant histological improvement that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. This study is ongoing to assess clinical outcomes

Baixa frequência de efeitos colaterais após administração acidental da vacina contra febre amarela em dose 25 vezes concentrada

Submitted by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2017-04-17T18:27:42Z No. of bitstreams: 1 CPqRR - Baixa frequência de efeitos colaterais.pdf: 57719 bytes, checksum: 5d0a963fda1602fe34f013b40ce61e3c (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2017-04-17T18:41:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 CPqRR - Baixa frequência de efeitos colaterais.pdf: 57719 bytes, checksum: 5d0a963fda1602fe34f013b40ce61e3c (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-17T18:41:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 CPqRR - Baixa frequência de efeitos colaterais.pdf: 57719 bytes, checksum: 5d0a963fda1602fe34f013b40ce61e3c (MD5) Previous issue date: 2002Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Laboratório de Pesquisas Clínicas. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Laboratório de Pesquisas Clínicas. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Laboratório de Pesquisas Clínicas. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Prefeitura de Contagem. Secretaria Municipal de Saúde. Contagem, MG, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Estado de Minas Gerais. Secretaria de Saúde. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.Em agosto/1999, em conseqüência de engano na etapa de diluição, um grupo de 14 funcionários de um hospital privado de Contagem Minas Gerais, Brasil, foi imunizado com uma dose 25 vezes mais concentrada do que a recomendada da vacina 17-DD contra febre amarela (Biomanguinhos). Todos o pacientes foram acompanhados através de exames clínicos e laboratoriais nos dias 5, 13 e 35 após a imunização. A freqüência de efeitos colaterais e as manifestações clínicas e laboratoriais não diferiram das observadas em indivíduos imunizados com doses convencionais da vacina. Ao tempo da segunda e terceira avaliações, nenhum dos pacientes relatava sintomas e nenhum deles apresentou anormalidades ao exame físico. Apenas um paciente apresentou alteração laboratorial, sendo observada plaquetopenia no momento da primeira e da segunda avaliação, que retornou aos valores normais ao terceiro exame. À primeira avaliação, seis pacientes apresentavam resposta imune ao teste de redução de neutralização em placa. Em cinco pacientes, o título foi 10 vezes maior do que o valor de corte de 2.36 Log10 mUI/ml. As amostras de sangue colhidas aos tempos 2 e 3 (13 e 35 dias) demonstraram que quase todos os indivíduos responderam à vacinação, com a exceção de um que não apresentou positividade em nenhum dos tempos de avaliação. Este episódio confirma a segurança da vacina 17-DD contra febre amarela.In August/1999, a group of 14 adults from the staff of a private hospital in Contagem Minas Gerais State, Brazil, received unintentionally a 25 times concentrated dose of the 17-DD yellow fever vaccine (Bio-Manguinhos), due to a mistake at the reconstitution step. All patients were clinically and laboratorially evaluated at days 5, 13 and 35 post vaccination. Frequency of side effects and clinical observations of this group of individuals were not different from the observed in recipients immunized with normal doses of the vaccine. At the second and third evaluation none of the subjects reported symptoms. None of the patients presented abnormalities at the physical examination at none of the time points and in all cases the blood examination was normal, except for a reduced number of platelets that was detected in one subject at the first and second evaluation and reverted to normal at third evaluation. At the first evaluation point, 8 subjects were serum negative and 6 serum positive for yellow fever at the plaque reduction neutralization test. In 5 subjects the observed titre was 10 times higher as the baseline of 2.36 Log10 mUI/ml. The samples collected at second and third evaluation (13th and 35th days) demonstrated that all subjects responded to the vaccination with the exception of one that did not present a positive result in any of the samples collected. This evaluation confirms the safety of the 17-DD yellow fever vaccine

Subdoses of 17DD yellow fever vaccine elicit equivalent virological/immunological kinetics timeline

Submitted by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-03-02T18:59:13Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_133.pdf: 1767507 bytes, checksum: 7391488fb6c7b01f4d8694e5da140f58 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-03-02T18:59:19Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_133.pdf: 1767507 bytes, checksum: 7391488fb6c7b01f4d8694e5da140f58 (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-03-02T19:12:15Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_133.pdf: 1767507 bytes, checksum: 7391488fb6c7b01f4d8694e5da140f58 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2015-03-02T19:12:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_133.pdf: 1767507 bytes, checksum: 7391488fb6c7b01f4d8694e5da140f58 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro,RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Instituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou. Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil.Background: The live attenuated 17DD Yellow Fever vaccine is one of the most successful prophylactic interventions for controlling disease expansion ever designed and utilized in larger scale. However, increase on worldwide vaccine demands and manufacturing restrictions urge for more detailed dose sparing studies. The establishment of complementary biomarkers in addition to PRNT and Viremia could support a secure decision-making regarding the use of 17DD YF vaccine subdoses. The present work aimed at comparing the serum chemokine and cytokine kinetics triggered by five subdoses of 17DD YF Vaccine. Methods: Neutralizing antibody titers, viremia, cytokines and chemokines were tested on blood samples obtained from eligible primary vaccinees. Results and discussion: The results demonstrated that a fifty-fold lower dose of 17DD-YF vaccine (587 IU) is able to trigger similar immunogenicity, as evidenced by significant titers of anti-YF PRNT. However, only subdoses as low as 3,013 IU elicit viremia kinetics with an early peak at five days after primary vaccination equivalent to the current dose (27,476 IU), while other subdoses show a distinct, lower in magnitude and later peak at day 6 post-vaccination. Although the subdose of 587 IU is able to trigger equivalent kinetics of IL-8/CXCL-8 and MCP-1/CCL-2, only the subdose of 3,013 IU is able to trigger similar kinetics of MIG/CXCL-9, pro-inflammatory (TNF, IFN-γ and IL-2) and modulatory cytokines (IL-5 and IL-10). Conclusions: The analysis of serum biomarkers IFN-γ and IL-10, in association to PRNT and viremia, support the recommendation of use of a ten-fold lower subdose (3,013 IU) of 17DD-YF vaccine

Duration of post-vaccination immunity against yellow fever in adults

Submitted by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-06-22T17:37:43Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-06-22T17:37:52Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Nuzia Santos ([email protected]) on 2015-06-22T17:58:36Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2015-06-22T17:58:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2014_152.pdf: 756403 bytes, checksum: c18d98237e29e19e785cf895a2a68ddc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Brasilia, DF, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrazilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicosde Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto de Tecnologia em Imunobiológicos de Bio-Manguinhos. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Imunopatologia .Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Esquistossomose. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Centro de Pesquisa Rene Rachou. Laboratório de Biomarcadores. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilFood and Drug Administration Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Bethesda, USA.Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Fla-vivirus. Rio de JaneiroFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Fla-vivirus. Rio de JaneiroFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. Laboratorio de Fla-vivirus. Rio de JaneiroInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilInstituto de Biologia do Exército. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilMinas Gerais. Secretaria Estadual de Saude. Belo Horizonte, MG, BrasilUniversidade Federal de Alfenas. Alfenas, MG, BrasilUniversidade de Brasília. Faculdade de Medicina. Brasilia, DF, BrasilFundação Oswaldo Cruz. Instituto Evandro Chagas. Ananindeua, PA, BrasilINTRODUCTION: Available scientific evidence to recommend or to advise against booster doses of yellow fever vaccine (YFV) is inconclusive. A study to estimate the seropositivity rate and geometric mean titres (GMT) of adults with varied times of vaccination was aimed to provide elements to revise the need and the timing of revaccination. METHODS: Adults from the cities of Rio de Janeiro and Alfenas located in non-endemic areas in the Southeast of Brazil, who had one dose of YFV, were tested for YF neutralising antibodies and dengue IgG. Time (in years) since vaccination was based on immunisation cards and other reliable records. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2012 we recruited 691 subjects (73% males), aged 18-83 years. Time since vaccination ranged from 30 days to 18 years. Seropositivity rates (95%C.I.) and GMT (International Units/mL; 95%C.I.) decreased with time since vaccination: 93% (88-96%), 8.8 (7.0-10.9) IU/mL for newly vaccinated; 94% (88-97), 3.0 (2.5-3.6) IU/mL after 1-4 years; 83% (74-90), 2.2 (1.7-2.8) IU/mL after 5-9 years; 76% (68-83), 1.7 (1.4-2.0) IU/mL after 10-11 years; and 85% (80-90), 2.1 (1.7-2.5) IU/mL after 12 years or more. YF seropositivity rates were not affected by previous dengue infection. CONCLUSIONS:Eventhough serological correlates of protection for yellow fever are unknown, seronegativity in vaccinated subjects may indicate primary immunisation failure, or waning of immunity to levels below the protection threshold. Immunogenicity of YFV under routine conditions of immunisation services is likely to be lower than in controlled studies. Moreover, infants and toddlers, who comprise the main target group in YF endemic regions, and populations with high HIV infection rates, respond to YFV with lower antibody levels. In those settings one booster dose, preferably sooner than currently recommended, seems to be necessary to ensure longer protection for all vaccinee

Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Background The effects of empagliflozin in patients with chronic kidney disease who are at risk for disease progression are not well understood. The EMPA-KIDNEY trial was designed to assess the effects of treatment with empagliflozin in a broad range of such patients. Methods We enrolled patients with chronic kidney disease who had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of at least 20 but less than 45 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area, or who had an eGFR of at least 45 but less than 90 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) with a urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (with albumin measured in milligrams and creatinine measured in grams) of at least 200. Patients were randomly assigned to receive empagliflozin (10 mg once daily) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was a composite of progression of kidney disease (defined as end-stage kidney disease, a sustained decrease in eGFR to < 10 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2), a sustained decrease in eGFR of & GE;40% from baseline, or death from renal causes) or death from cardiovascular causes. Results A total of 6609 patients underwent randomization. During a median of 2.0 years of follow-up, progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes occurred in 432 of 3304 patients (13.1%) in the empagliflozin group and in 558 of 3305 patients (16.9%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.64 to 0.82; P < 0.001). Results were consistent among patients with or without diabetes and across subgroups defined according to eGFR ranges. The rate of hospitalization from any cause was lower in the empagliflozin group than in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.95; P=0.003), but there were no significant between-group differences with respect to the composite outcome of hospitalization for heart failure or death from cardiovascular causes (which occurred in 4.0% in the empagliflozin group and 4.6% in the placebo group) or death from any cause (in 4.5% and 5.1%, respectively). The rates of serious adverse events were similar in the two groups. Conclusions Among a wide range of patients with chronic kidney disease who were at risk for disease progression, empagliflozin therapy led to a lower risk of progression of kidney disease or death from cardiovascular causes than placebo