Serial angiographic follow-up after palmaz-schatz stent implantation: Comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty

AbstractObjectives. Serial angiographic follow-up study was designed to evaluate the temporal mode of lumen diameter changes after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation, and the results were compared with those from a cohort of patients undergoing balloon angioplasty.Background. Restenosis remains a major limitation of balloon angioplasty. The Palmaz-Schatz balloon expandable coronary stent is now under clinical investigation to evaluate its efficacy in preventing restenosis.Methods. Serial angiographic follow-up study was performed the day after stent implantation and at 1, 3 and 6 months after the procedure. The stent group consisted of 96 patients who had 97 lesions with a single stent. A cohort of 179 patients with 192 lesions were selected as the balloon group by the criteria of final balloon size ≥3 mm and lesion length <20 mm.Results. A significantly larger lumen diameter was obtained immediately after stent implantation (2.9 ± 0.4 mm [mean ± SD] in the stent group vs. 2.1 ± 0.5 mm in the balloon group, p < 0.001). At 3 to 6 months of follow-up, a significantly larger lumen diameter was maintained in the start group (2.2 ± 0.6 vs. 1.5 ± 9.7 mm, p < 0.001). The late restenosis rate according to a binary definition was significantly lower to the stent group (13% vs. 39%, p < 0.001). Stenosis exacerbation, frequently observed within 24 h after balloon angioplasty, was not found after stenting. Between the next day and 1 month, regression was dominant in the balloon group, whereas progression of stenosis was observed in the stent group. The greatest tendency to restenosis was observed in both groups between 1 and 3 months after the procedure. Between 3 and 6 months, significantly greater diameter loss was found in the stent group.Conclusions. The Palmaz-Schatz stent was effective in reducing the restenosis rate in this highly selected cobort of patients. Reduction in restenosis rate was dependent on a larger lumen obtained immediately. Late loss of diameter was significantly greater after stenting. The restenosis rate after stenting should be evaluated by follw-up angiography at 6 months rather than at 3 months, which is adequate after conventional balloon angioplasty

Risk of bleeding and repeated bleeding events in prasugrel-treated patients: a review of data from the Japanese PRASFIT studies

Prasugrel is a third-generation thienopyridine that achieves potent platelet inhibition with less pharmacological variability than other thienopyridines. However, clinical experience suggests that prasugrel may be associated with a higher risk of de novo and recurrent bleeding events compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this review, we evaluate the risk of bleeding in Japanese patients treated with prasugrel at the doses (loading/maintenance doses: 20/3.75 mg) adjusted for Japanese patients, evaluate the risk factors for bleeding in Japanese patients, and examine whether patients with a bleeding event are at increased risk of recurrent bleeding. This review covers published data and new analyses of the PRASFIT (PRASugrel compared with clopidogrel For Japanese patIenTs) trials of patients undergoing PCI for acute coronary syndrome or elective reasons. The bleeding risk with prasugrel was similar to that observed with the standard dose of clopidogrel (300/75 mg), including when bleeding events were re-classified using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. The pharmacodynamics of prasugrel was not associated with the risk of bleeding events. The main risk factors for bleeding events were female sex, low body weight, advanced age, and presence of diabetes mellitus. Use of a radial puncture site was associated with a lower risk of bleeding during PCI than a femoral puncture site. Finally, the frequency and severity of recurrent bleeding events during continued treatment were similar between prasugrel and clopidogrel. In summary, this review provides important insights into the risk and types of bleeding events in prasugrel-treated patients. Trial registration numbers: JapicCTI-101339 and JapicCTI-111550

1-Year Results of the ZEPHYR Registry (Zilver PTX for the Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery) Predictors of Restenosis

AbstractObjectivesThis study sought to assess the rate and predictors of 1-year restenosis after drug-eluting stent implantation for femoropopliteal (FP) lesions in patients with peripheral arterial disease.BackgroundZilver PTX, a paclitaxel-eluting stent for FP lesions, provides superior outcomes to angioplasty and bare-metal stents in clinical trials. However, its real-world outcomes and the associated features remain unclear.MethodsThis was a prospective multicenter study enrolling 831 FP lesions (797 limbs, 690 patients) treated by Zilver PTX implantation. The primary endpoint was 1-year restenosis. Secondary endpoints included major adverse limb event and stent thrombosis.ResultsMean lesion length was 17 ± 10 cm. One-year restenosis, major adverse limb event, and stent thrombosis rates were 37%, 22%, and 2%, respectively. The generalized linear mixed model showed that lesion length ≥16 cm assessed by angiography and distal external elastic membrane area ≤27 mm2 and minimum stent area ≤12 mm2 assessed by intravascular ultrasound were independent risk factors for restenosis. One-year restenosis rates were 15% in cases with none of these risk factors and 50% in those with ≥2 risk factors.ConclusionsThe current study demonstrated 1-year real-world outcomes after drug-eluting stent treatment for FP lesions, including challenging ones in clinical practice. Lesion length, external elastic membrane area, and minimum stent area were independent predictors for restenosis. (Zilver PTX for the Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery—Prospective Multicenter Registry [ZEPHYR]; UMIN000008433

CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2018

While primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has significantly contributed to improve the mortality in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction even in cardiogenic shock, primary PCI is a standard of care in most of Japanese institutions. Whereas there are high numbers of available facilities providing primary PCI in Japan, there are no clear guidelines focusing on procedural aspect of the standardized care. Whilst updated guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction were recently published by European Society of Cardiology, the following major changes are indicated; (1) radial access and drug-eluting stent over bare metal stent were recommended as Class I indication, and (2) complete revascularization before hospital discharge (either immediate or staged) is now considered as Class IIa recommendation. Although the primary PCI is consistently recommended in recent and previous guidelines, the device lag from Europe, the frequent usage of coronary imaging modalities in Japan, and the difference in available medical therapy or mechanical support may prevent direct application of European guidelines to Japanese population. The Task Force on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of the Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) has now proposed the expert consensus document for the management of acute myocardial infarction focusing on procedural aspect of primary PCI

Clinical Events After Deferral of LAD Revascularization Following Physiological Coronary Assessment

BACKGROUND Physicians are not always comfortable deferring treatment of a stenosis in the left anterior descending (LAD) artery because of the perception that there is a high risk of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The authors describe, using the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to Guide Revascularisation) trial, MACE rates when LAD lesions are deferred, guided by physiological assessment using fractional flow reserve (FFR) or the instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to establish the safety of deferring treatment in the LAD using FFR or iFR within the DEFINE-FLAIR trial. METHODS MACE rates at 1 year were compared between groups (iFR and FFR) in patients whose physiological assessment led to LAD lesions being deferred. MACE was defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI), and unplanned revascularization at 1 year. Patients, and staff performing follow-up, were blinded to whether the decision was made with FFR or iFR. Outcomes were adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS A total of 872 patients had lesions deferred in the LAD (421 guided by FFR, 451 guided by iFR). The event rate with iFR was significantly lower than with FFR (2.44% vs. 5.26%; adjusted HR: 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.22 to 0.95; p = 0.04). This was driven by significantly lower unplanned revascularization with iFR and numerically lower MI (unplanned revascularization: 2.22% iFR vs. 4.99% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.93; p = 0.03; MI: 0.44% iFR vs. 2.14% FFR; adjusted HR: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.05 to 1.07; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS iFR-guided deferral appears to be safe for patients with LAD lesions. Patients in whom iFR-guided deferral was performed had statistically significantly lower event rates than those with FFR-guided deferral. (c) 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Peer reviewe