Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

Reducing the environmental impact of surgery on a global scale: systematic review and co-prioritization with healthcare workers in 132 countries

Abstract Background Healthcare cannot achieve net-zero carbon without addressing operating theatres. The aim of this study was to prioritize feasible interventions to reduce the environmental impact of operating theatres. Methods This study adopted a four-phase Delphi consensus co-prioritization methodology. In phase 1, a systematic review of published interventions and global consultation of perioperative healthcare professionals were used to longlist interventions. In phase 2, iterative thematic analysis consolidated comparable interventions into a shortlist. In phase 3, the shortlist was co-prioritized based on patient and clinician views on acceptability, feasibility, and safety. In phase 4, ranked lists of interventions were presented by their relevance to high-income countries and low–middle-income countries. Results In phase 1, 43 interventions were identified, which had low uptake in practice according to 3042 professionals globally. In phase 2, a shortlist of 15 intervention domains was generated. In phase 3, interventions were deemed acceptable for more than 90 per cent of patients except for reducing general anaesthesia (84 per cent) and re-sterilization of ‘single-use’ consumables (86 per cent). In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for high-income countries were: introducing recycling; reducing use of anaesthetic gases; and appropriate clinical waste processing. In phase 4, the top three shortlisted interventions for low–middle-income countries were: introducing reusable surgical devices; reducing use of consumables; and reducing the use of general anaesthesia. Conclusion This is a step toward environmentally sustainable operating environments with actionable interventions applicable to both high– and low–middle–income countries

A Phase 2 Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Internal Carotid Artery Infusion of Autologous Bone Marrow-Derived ALD-401 Cells in Patients With Recent Stable Ischemic Stroke (RECOVER-Stroke).

BACKGROUND: Ischemic stroke has no approved treatments to enhance recovery. ALD-401 is an enriched population of aldehyde dehydrogenase-bright stem cells, capable of reducing neurological deficits in animal models. The primary objective of this trial was to determine the safety of internal carotid artery, intra-arterially delivered autologous bone marrow-derived ALD-401 in patients with disabling middle cerebral artery stroke in comparison with sham harvest with sham infusion. Secondary objectives were to determine feasibility and efficacy. METHODS: This was a prospective phase 2, industry-funded, randomized, sham-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study with blinded assessments. One hundred subjects were planned, aged 30 to 83 years, with confirmed first-time middle cerebral artery ischemic stroke with modified Rankin scale ≥3. Study patients were randomly assigned 3:2 to bone marrow harvest at 11 to 17 days after stroke followed 2 days later by intracarotid infusion of ALD-401 versus sham harvest and then sham infusion in the same timeframe. The primary study outcome was safety based on the incidence of a 4-point National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale worsening and the proportion of serious adverse events. Efficacy was based on modified Rankin scale change at 90 days. Other secondary outcomes were the proportions of patients experiencing adverse events, disability by Barthel Index, quality of life using EQ-5D, rehabilitation utilization, disability at 1 year, and MRI evidence of complications. RESULTS: There were no infusional or allergic reactions and no difference in treatment emergent adverse events. Four patients had small areas of asymptomatic restricted diffusion on MRI in the treatment group. There was no significant difference between the ALD-401 and placebo groups on the modified Rankin scale for the intent-to-treat population at day 90 (mean difference, 0.3; 95% CI, -0.3 to 0.8; P=0.330). There were no significant differences between the groups on any of the secondary efficacy measures. CONCLUSIONS: Intracarotid infusion of ALD-401 does not lead to clinical adverse events in patients with subacute ischemic stroke, although there was a higher incidence of small lesions on MRI in the treatment group. There was no difference in the primary efficacy end point between the groups. The study provides a framework for the design and conduct of future intra-arterial cell therapy trials in stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01273337

Treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review

Introduction: Unruptured brain aneurysms (UIAs) present a challenge due to the lack of definitive understanding of their natural history and treatment outcomes. As the treatment of UIAs is aimed at preventing the possibility of rupture, the immediate risk of treatment must be weighed against the risk of rupture in the future. As such, treatment for a large proportion of UIAs is currently individualized. Areas covered: In this article, we discuss the important natural history studies of UIAs and discuss the existing scientific evidence and recent advances that help identify the rupture risk guide management of UIAs. We also address the recent advances in pharmacological therapy of UIAs. Expert commentary: In the recent years, there have been great advances in understanding the pathophysiology of UIAs and determining the rupture risk going beyond the traditional parameter of aneurysm size. Aneurysm morphology and hemodynamics play a pivotal role in growth and rupture. A true randomized trial for the management of UIAs is the need of the hour