9 research outputs found
wikidata-20180813-all.json.bz2
A copy of a dump which was available here: https://dumps.wikimedia.org/wikidatawiki/entities/</p
Wikidata dump 2017-12-27
Wikidata dump retrieved from https://dumps.wikimedia.org/wikidatawiki/entities/latest-all.json.bz2 on 27 Dec 2017</p
Basque Lexical Data in Wikidata (ELEXIS)
This dataset contains Basque lemma-sense pairs with a POS tag, and definitions, extracted from Wikidata using this query: https://w.wiki/qWH . Other RDF statements related to Basque lexemes can be retrieved, such as links from lexeme sense to Wikidata concept
Table 2: Absolute and relative link counts from OTT, WD, and GloBI compared to WoRMS, GBIF, Index Fungorum (IF), and NCBI.
Semalytics: a semantic analytics platform for the exploration of distributed and heterogeneous cancer data in translational research
SOCCOMAS: a FAIR web content management system that uses knowledge graphs and that is based on semantic programming
A Longitudinal Analysis of University Rankings
Pressured by globalization and the increasing demand for public organisations
to be accountable, efficient and transparent, university rankings have become
an important tool for assessing the quality of higher education institutions.
It is therefore important to carefully assess exactly what these rankings
measure. In this paper, the three major global university rankings, The
Academic Ranking of World Universities, The Times Higher Education and the
Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings, are studied. After a
description of the ranking methodologies, it is shown that university rankings
are stable over time but that there is variation between the three rankings.
Furthermore, using Principal Component Analysis and Exploratory Factor
Analysis, we show that the variables used to construct the rankings primarily
measure two underlying factors: a universities reputation and its research
performance. By correlating these factors and plotting regional aggregates of
universities on the two factors, differences between the rankings are made
visible. Last, we elaborate how the results from these analysis can be viewed
in light of often voiced critiques of the ranking process. This indicates that
the variables used by the rankings might not capture the concepts they claim to
measure. Doing so the study provides evidence of the ambiguous nature of
university ranking's quantification of university performance
