Market Structure and Matching with Contracts

Ostrovsky [10] develops a theory of stability for a model of matching in exogenously given networks. For this model a generalization of pairwise stability, chain stability, can always be satisfied as long as agents’ preferences satisfy same side substitutability and cross side complementarity. Given this preference domain I analyze the interplay between properties of the network structure and (cooperative) solution concepts. The main structural condition is an acyclicity notion that rules out the implementation of trading cycles. It is shown that this condition and the restriction that no pair of agents can sign more than one contract with each other are jointly necessary and sufficient for (i) the equivalence of group and chain stability, (ii) the core stability of chain stable networks, (iii) the efficiency of chain stable networks, (iv) the existence of a group stable network, and (v) the existence of an efficient and individually stable network. These equivalences also provide a rationale for chain stability in the unrestricted model. The (more restrictive) conditions under which chain stability coincides with the core are also characterized

Essays on Matching Markets

The thesis "Essays on Matching Markets" contributes to the theory and applications of matching theory. The first chapter analyzes the German university admissions system and proposes an alternative admissions procedure that outperforms the currently used mechanism. In particular, the new mechanism provides strong (i.e. dominant strategy) incentives for applicants to reveal their true preferences and achieves a notion of stability that is adapted to the German system. In the second chapter we analyze the school choice problem with indifferences in priority orders. In this context, stability (with respect to student preferences and school priorities) can be understood as a fairness criterion which ensures that no student ever envies another student for a school at which she has higher priority. Since school seats are objects to be allocated among students, it is important to ensure that a constrained efficient allocation is selected, i.e. an allocation that is stable and not (Pareto-) dominated by any other stable matching. A counterexample of Erdil and Ergin (American Economic Review, 2008) shows that there may not exist a non-manipulable and constrained efficient mechanism. We consider the case where students either all have the same priority or all have distinct priorities for a given school. For this important special case we investigate whether the negative result of Erdil and Ergin is the rule or an exception and derive sufficient conditions for the existence of a constrained efficient and (dominant strategy) incentive compatible mechanism. The proof is constructive and shows how preferences of students can (sometimes) be used to prevent any welfare loss from tie-breaking decisions. The third chapter deals with a more general matching model recently introduced by Ostrovsky (American Economic Review, 2008). For this model we analyze the relation between Ostrovsky's chain stability concept, efficiency, and several competing stability concepts. We characterize the largest class of matching models for which chain stable outcomes are guaranteed to be stable and robust to all possible coalitional deviations. Furthermore, we provide two rationales, one based on efficiency and the other based on robustness considerations, for chain stability in the general supply chain model

Market Structure and Matching with Contracts

Ostrovsky [10] develops a theory of stability for a model of matching in exogenously given networks. For this model a generalization of pairwise stability, chain stability, can always be satisfied as long as agents’ preferences satisfy same side substitutability and cross side complementarity. Given this preference domain I analyze the interplay between properties of the network structure and (cooperative) solution concepts. The main structural condition is an acyclicity notion that rules out the implementation of trading cycles. It is shown that this condition and the restriction that no pair of agents can sign more than one contract with each other are jointly necessary and sufficient for (i) the equivalence of group and chain stability, (ii) the core stability of chain stable networks, (iii) the efficiency of chain stable networks, (iv) the existence of a group stable network, and (v) the existence of an efficient and individually stable network. These equivalences also provide a rationale for chain stability in the unrestricted model. The (more restrictive) conditions under which chain stability coincides with the core are also characterized.Matching with Contracts, Network Structure, Chain Stability, Acyclicity, Group Stability, Core, Efficiency

Strategy-proof tie-breaking

We study a general class of priority-based allocation problems with weak priority orders and identify conditions under which there exists a strategy-proof mechanism which always chooses an agent-optimal stable, or constrained efficient, matching. A priority structure for which these two requirements are compatible is called solvable. For the general class of priority-based allocation problems with weak priority orders,we introduce three simple necessary conditions on the priority structure. We show that these conditions completely characterize solvable environments within the class of indifferences at the bottom (IB) environments, where ties occur only at the bottom of the priority structure. This generalizes and unifies previously known results on solvable and unsolvable environments established in school choice, housing markets and house allocation with existing tenants. We show how the previously known solvable cases can be viewed as extreme cases of solvable environments. For sufficiency of our conditions we introduce a version of the agent-proposing deferred acceptance algorithm with exogenous and preference-based tie-breaking

Implementing quotas in university admissions: An experimental analysis

Quotas for special groups of students often apply in school or university admission procedures. This paper studies the performance of two mechanisms to implement such quotas in a lab experiment. The first mechanism is a simplified version of the mechanism currently employed by the German central clearinghouse for university admissions, which first allocates seats in the quota for top-grade students before allocating all other seats among remaining applicants. The second is a modified version of the student-proposing deferred acceptance (SDA) algorithm, which simultaneously allocates seats in all quotas. Our main result is that the current procedure, designed to give top-grade students an advantage, actually harms them, as students often fail to grasp the strategic issues involved. The modified SDA algorithm significantly improves the matching for top-grade students and could thus be a valuable tool for redesigning university admissions in Germany. --college admissions,experiment,quotas,matching,Gale-Shapley mechanism,Boston mechanism

Implementing quotas in university admissions: An experimental analysis

Quotas for special groups of students often apply in school or university admission procedures. This paper studies the performance of two mechanisms to implement such quotas in a lab experiment. The first mechanism is a simplified version of the mechanism currently employed by the German central clearinghouse for university admissions, which first allocates seats in the quota for top-grade students before allocating all other seats among remaining applicants. The second is a modied version of the student-proposing deferred acceptance (SDA) algorithm, which simultaneously allocates seats in all quotas. Our main result is that the current procedure, designed to give top-grade students an advantage, actually harms them, as students often fail to grasp the strategic issues involved. The modified SDA algorithm significantly improves the matching for top-grade students and could thus be a valuable tool for redesigning university admissions in Germany.College admissions, experiment, quotas, matching; Gale-Shapley mechanism, Boston mechanism

Implementing quotas in university admissions: An experimental investigation

Quotas for special groups of students often apply in school or university admission procedures. This paper studies the performance of two mechanisms to implement such quotas in a lab experiment. The first mechanism is a simplified version of the mechanism currently employed by the German central clearinghouse for university admissions, which first allocates seats in the quota for top-grade students before allocating all other seats among remaining applicants. The second is a modified version of the student-proposing deferred acceptance (SDA) algorithm, which simultaneously allocates seats in all quotas. Our main result is that the current procedure, designed to give top-grade students an advantage, actually harms them, as students often fail to grasp the strategic issues involved. The modified SDA algorithm significantly improves the matching for top-grade students and could thus be a valuable tool for redesigning university admissions in Germany

Implementing quotas in university admissions

Quotas for special groups of students often apply in school or university admission procedures. This paper studies the performance of two mechanisms to implement such quotas in a lab experiment. The first mechanism is a simplified version of the mechanism currently employed by the German central clearinghouse for university admissions, which first allocates seats in the quota for top-grade students before allocating all other seats among remaining applicants. The second is a modified version of the student-proposing deferred acceptance (SDA) algorithm, which simultaneously allocates seats in all quotas. Our main result is that the current procedure, designed to give top-grade students an advantage, actually harms them, as students often fail to grasp the strategic issues involved. The modified SDA algorithm significantly improves the matching for top-grade students and could thus be a valuable tool for redesigning university admissions in Germany

Implementing quotas in university admissions: An experimental analysis,” 2012. Max Planck Institute for Tax Law and Public Finance Working Paper

Abstract Quotas for special groups of students often apply in school or university admission procedures. This paper studies the performance of two mechanisms to implement such quotas in a lab experiment. The first mechanism is a simplified version of the mechanism currently employed by the German central clearinghouse for university admissions, which first allocates seats in the quota for top-grade students before allocating all other seats among remaining applicants. The second is a modified version of the student-proposing deferred acceptance (SDA) algorithm, which simultaneously allocates seats in all quotas. Our main result is that the current procedure, designed to give top-grade students an advantage, actually harms them, as students often fail to grasp the strategic issues involved. The modified SDA algorithm significantly improves the matching for top-grade students and could thus be a valuable tool for redesigning university admissions in Germany

A Fehér Internacionálé : Magyar–bajor–osztrák revizionista együttműködési kísérletek, 1919–1923

Kominers thanks the National Science Foundation (grant CCF-1216095 and a graduate research fellowship), the Yahoo! Key Scientific Challenges Program, the John M. Olin Center (a Terence M. Considine Fellowship), the American Mathematical Society, and the Simons Foundation for support. Nichifor thanks the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (grant VIDI-452-06-013) and the Scottish Institute for Research in Economics for support. Ostrovsky thanks the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for support. Westkamp thanks the German Science Foundation for support.We introduce a model in which agents in a network can trade via bilateral contracts. We find that when continuous transfers are allowed and utilities are quasilinear, the full substitutability of preferences is sufficient to guarantee the existence of stable outcomes for any underlying network structure. Furthermore, the set of stable outcomes is essentially equivalent to the set of competitive equilibria, and all stable outcomes are in the core and are efficient. By contrast, for any domain of preferences strictly larger than that of full substitutability, the existence of stable outcomes and competitive equilibria cannot be guaranteed.Publisher PDFPeer reviewe