30 research outputs found

    Microchip electrophoresis tools for the analysis of small molecules

    No full text
    Microchip electrophoresis (ME) results from miniaturization of capillary electrophoresis (CE) to a microfabricated separation device. Both techniques have common characteristics, but in some aspects, the microfluidic separation device has unique features resulting from its planar miniaturized format. Here we describe the process to transfer of CE to ME and the benefits and drawbacks of the chip with respect to the capillary. A practical guide for method development on the microchip for small ionizable molecules such as phenolic compounds, amino acids, or alkaloids is also presented.Fil: Gomez, Federico Jose Vicente. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de BiologĂ­a AgrĂ­cola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de BiologĂ­a AgrĂ­cola de Mendoza; ArgentinaFil: Silva, MarĂ­a Fernanda. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones CientĂ­ficas y TĂ©cnicas. Centro CientĂ­fico TecnolĂłgico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de BiologĂ­a AgrĂ­cola de Mendoza. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. Instituto de BiologĂ­a AgrĂ­cola de Mendoza; Argentin

    3D-printing of transparent bio-microfluidic devices in PEG-DA

    No full text
    The vast majority of microfluidic systems are molded in poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) by soft lithography due to the favorable properties of PDMS: biocompatible, elastomeric, transparent, gas-permeable, inexpensive, and copyright-free. However, PDMS molding involves tedious manual labor, which makes PDMS devices prone to assembly failures and difficult to disseminate to research and clinical settings. Furthermore, the fabrication procedures limit the 3D complexity of the devices to layered designs. Stereolithography (SL), a form of 3D-printing, has recently attracted attention as a way to customize the fabrication of biomedical devices due to its automated, assembly-free 3D fabrication, rapidly decreasing costs, and fast-improving resolution and throughput. However, existing SL resins are not biocompatible and patterning transparent resins at high resolution remains difficult. Here we report procedures for the preparation and patterning of a transparent resin based on low-MW poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate (MW 250) (PEG-DA-250). The 3D-printed devices are highly transparent and cells can be cultured on PEG-DA-250 prints for several days. This biocompatible SL resin and printing process solves some of the main drawbacks of 3D-printed microfluidic devices: biocompatibility and transparency. In addition, it should also enable the production of non-microfluidic biomedical devices.The Ilios 3D-Printer is on loan from 3D-Skema, Inc. A. U. is a recipient of a “La Caixa” fellowship from Catalonia and an European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO) short-term fellowship. C. P. is a recipient of a “Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología” (CONACYT) Mexican fellowship. F. P. is supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (BFU2015-64437-P and FEDER), the Catalan Government (2014 SGR 599) and an ERC Advanced Grant Number 294294 from the European Union seventh framework program (SYNCOM). F. P. is supported by Fundación Botín, by Banco Santander through its Santander Universities Global Division and recipient of an ICREA Acadèmia (Generalitat de Catalunya). For the cell culture data and cell microscopy, we acknowledge partial support from the National Institutes of Health, grant number 1R01NS064387-01A
    corecore