Electrocatalytic performance of SiO2-SWCNT nanocomposites prepared by electroassisted deposition

“The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12678-013-0144-3”Composite materials made of porous SiO2 matrices filled with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) were deposited on electrodes by an electroassisted deposition method. The synthesized materials were characterized by several techniques, showing that porous silica prevents the aggregation of SWCNT on the electrodes, as could be observed by transmission electron microscopy and Raman spectroscopy. Different redox probes were employed to test their electrochemical sensing properties. The silica layer allows the permeation of the redox probes to the electrode surface and improves the electrochemical reversibility indicating an electrocatalytic effect by the incorporation of dispersed SWCNT into the silica films.This work was financed by the following research projects: MAT2010-15273 of the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and FEDER, PROMETEO/2013/038 of the GV, and CIVP16A1821 of the Fundacion Ramon Areces. Alonso Gamero-Quijano and David Salinas-Torres acknowledge Generalitat Valenciana (Santiago Grisolia Program) and Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, respectively, for the funding of their research fellowships.Gamero-Quijano, A.; Huerta, F.; Salinas-Torres, D.; Morallón, E.; Montilla, F. (2013). Electrocatalytic performance of SiO2-SWCNT nanocomposites prepared by electroassisted deposition. Electrocatalysis. 4(4):259-266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-013-0144-3S25926644P. Alivisatos, Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 47 (2004)S. Stankovich, D.A. Dikin, G.H. Dommett, K.M. Kohlhaas, E.J. Zimney, E.A. Stach, R.D. Piner, S.T. Nguyen, R.S. Ruoff, Nature 442, 282 (2006)D.W. Schaefer, R.S. Justice, Macromolecules 40, 8501 (2007)M. Endo, M.S. Strano, P.M. Ajayan, Carbon Nanotubes 111, 13 (2008)C.E. Banks, R.G. Compton, Analyst 131, 15 (2006)R.H. Baughman, A.A. Zakhidov, W.A. de Heer, Science 297, 787 (2002)Y.H. Lin, F. Lu, Y. Tu, Z.F. Ren, Nano Letters 4, 191 (2004)B.R. Azamian, J.J. Davis, K.S. Coleman, C.B. Bagshaw, M.L.H. Green, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 12664 (2002)W. Yang, K. Ratinac, S. Ringer, P. Thordarson, J.G. Gooding, F. Braet, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 2114 (2010)C.E. Banks, R.G. Compton, Analyst 130, 1232 (2005)L. Mazurenko, M. Etienne, O. Tananaiko, V. Zaitsev, A. Walcarius, Electrochim. Acta 83, 359 (2012)J.M.P. Paloma Yáñez-Sedeño, J. Riu, F.X. Rius, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 29, 939 (2010)Z.J. Wang, M. Etienne, S. Poller, W. Schuhmann, G.W. Kohring, V. Mamane, A. Walcarius, Electroanalysis 24, 376 (2012)R. Bandyopadhyaya, E. Nativ-Roth, O. Regev, R. Yerushalmi-Rozen, Nano Letters 2, 25 (2002)C. Park, Z. Ounaies, K.A. Watson, R.E. Crooks, J. Smith, S.E. Lowther, J.W. Connell, E.J. Siochi, J.S. Harrison, T.L.S. Clair, Chem. Phys. Lett. 364, 303 (2002)O. Matarredona, H. Rhoads, Z.R. Li, J.H. Harwell, L. Balzano, D.E. Resasco, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 107, 13357 (2003)L. Vaisman, H. Wagner, G. Marom, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 128, 37 (2006)Y.C. Xing, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 19255 (2004)J.J. Liang, Y. Huang, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y.F. Ma, T.Y. Guo, Y.S. Chen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 2297 (2009)D. Salinas-Torres, F. Huerta, F. Montilla, E. Morallón, Electrochim. Acta 56, 2464 (2011)Z.F. Ren, Z.P. Huang, J.W. Xu, J.H. Wang, P. Bush, M.P. Siegal, P.N. Provencio, Science 282, 1105 (1998)W.Z. Li, S.S. Xie, L.X. Qian, B.H. Chang, B.S. Zou, W.Y. Zhou, R.A. Zhao, G. Wang, Science 274, 1701 (1996)M. Terrones, N. Grobert, J. Olivares, J.P. Zhang, H. Terrones, K. Kordatos, W.K. Hsu, J.P. Hare, P.D. Townsend, K. Prassides, A.K. Cheetham, H.W. Kroto, D.R.M. Walton, Nature 388, 52 (1997)R. Toledano, D. Mandler, Chem. Mater. 22, 3943 (2010)J.H. Rouse, Langmuir 21, 1055 (2005)X.B. Yan, B.K. Tay, Y. Yang, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 110, 25844 (2006)J. Lim, P. Malati, F. Bonet, B. Dunn, J. Electrochem. Soc. 154, A140 (2007)L.D. Zhu, C.Y. Tian, J.L. Zhai, R.L. Yang, Sensors and Actuators B-Chemical 125, 254 (2007)F. Montilla, M.A. Cotarelo, E. Morallón, J. Mater. Chem. 19, 305 (2009)D. Salinas-Torres, F. Montilla, F. Huerta, E. Morallón, Electrochim. Acta 56, 3620 (2011)T. Dobbins, R. Chevious, Y. Lvov, Polymers 3, 942 (2011)R. Esquembre, J.A. Poveda, C.R. Mateo, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 113, 7534 (2009)M.L. Ferrer, R. Esquembre, I. Ortega, C.R. Mateo, F. del Monte, Chem. Mater. 18, 554 (2006)M.J. O'Connell, S. Sivaram, S.K. Doorn, Physical Review B 69, 235415 (2004)C. Domingo, G. Santoro, Opt. Pura Apl 40, 175 (2007)M.S. Dresselhaus, G. Dresselhaus, R. Saito, A. Jorio, Physics Reports 409, 47 (2005)R.L. McCreery, Chem. Rev. 108, 2646 (2008)C.G. Zoski, in Handbook of Electrochemistry, 1st ed (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007

Ion-Transfer Voltammetric Behavior of Propranolol at Nanoscale Liquid-Liquid Interface Arrays

In this work, the ion-transfer voltammetric detection of the protonated β-blocker propranolol was explored at arrays of nanoscale interfaces between two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES). Silicon nitride nanoporous membranes with 400 pores in a hexagonal arrangement, with either 50 or 17 nm radius pores, were used to form regular arrays of nanoITIES. It was found that the aqueous-to-organic ion-transfer current continuously increased steadily rather than reaching a limiting current plateau after the ion-transfer wave; the slope of this limiting current region was concentration dependent and associated with the high ion flux at the nanointerfaces. Electrochemical data were examined in terms of an independent nanointerface approach and an equivalent microdisc approach, supported by finite element simulation. In comparison to the larger interface configuration (50 nm radius), the array of 17 nm radius nanoITIES exhibited a 6.5-times higher current density for propranolol detection due to the enhanced ion flux arising from the convergent diffusion to smaller electrochemical interfaces. Both nanoITIES arrays achieved the equivalent limits of detection, 0.8 μM, using cyclic voltammetry. Additionally, the effect of scan rate on the charging and faradaic currents at these nanoITIES arrays, as well as their stability over time, was investigated. The results demonstrate that arrays of nanoscale liquid–liquid interfaces can be applied to study electrochemical drug transfer, and provide the basis for the development of miniaturized and integrated detection platforms for drug analysis

Simple and clear evidence for positive feedback limitation by bipolar behavior during scanning electrochemical microscopy of unbiased conductors

On the basis of an experimentally validated simple theoretical model, it is demonstrated unambiguously that when an unbiased conductor is probed by a scanning electrochemical tip (scanning electrochemical microscopy, SECM), it performs as a bipolar electrode. Though already envisioned in most recent SECM theories, this phenomenon is generally overlooked in SECM experimental investigations. However, as is shown here, this may alter significantly positive feedback measurements when the probed conductor is not much larger than the ti