Toward a Theory of Experience

Science Education, Vol. 98, No. 1, pp. 106–126Experience is one of the most used terms in (science) education, and it is recognized as being related to learning (education). Yet what experience is and how it is related to learning and change remains untheorized. In this paper, we mainly draw on the work of J. Dewey and L. S. Vygotsky but also on M. Bakhtin and more recent advances on the topic of experience from French philosophy to contribute to a theory of this important category. Accordingly, experience is not something that belongs to or is had by individuals but rather denotes transactions in and across space and time within irreducible person-in-setting units; and it is perfused with an affect that is not (only) the result of mental constructions. An episode from an Australian physics classroom is used to exemplify what such a theory and its method-related implications have to accomplish in the analysis of concrete science lessons

the interplay of rationality and identity in a mathematical group work

This contribution originates from a joint work aimed at networking theoretical tools and employ them to better understand teaching and learning episodes, with a special focus on mathematical group work. In a socio-cultural perspective, two theoretical lenses are combined: the construct of rational behavior, initially developed by Habermas and adapted in mathematics education, and that of identity. In this paper we propose a general description of our approach and present the main findings emerged after investigations in grade 6 (group work on negative numbers) and grade 4 (arithmetics problem solving). The networked analysis sheds light into mathematical group works: the students' mathematical identities turn into prevailing dimensions of rational behavior and the interplay of dimensions of rationality affects the participation into the group activity. Moreover, the teacher is shown to have a role in students' identifying process, affecting indirectly the students' participation