Visit to Papermaking Studio; Letterpress Studio; Media Archaeology Collection

Aimee Lee: Papermaking StudioLocation: Hales Gym Ed Vermue: Letterpress Studio Demo and Open HouseLocation: Mary Church Terrell Main Library Rian Brown-Orso and Heath Patten: Media Archaeology Collection of Objects and Screening of Rian Brown-Orso\u27s animated shortsLocation: Goodrich Room, Mary Church Terrell Main Librar

Panel Discussion: Active Learning with Objects / Moderator: Ed Vermue

The panel will be comprised of library and faculty leaders discussing creative methodologies in objects-based pedagogy inside and outside of the classroom

Student Voices Session / Moderator: Ed Vermue

Hear how objects-based pedagogy has shaped and positively impacted the educational experiences of students. Jennifer Lin: English and East Asian StudiesUna Creedon-Carey: Medieval StudiesSarah Rose Lejeune: Book ArtsJulian Hirsch: ArchaeologyNathan Carpenter: Africatown Projec

Lunch and Learn Small Discussion Groups

Mini-conversations in which attendees self-select. There will be a discussant at each table to assist in guiding the dialogues. Alexia Hudson-Ward: Situating Our Work Within the Mission in a Liberal Arts SettingStrategies on how to strategically communicate and steward the importance of this work to the faculty and senior leaders of our institutions as a mission-centered imperative. Laura Perrings: Educational Opportunities Provided by Rare Book SchoolLearn more about the educational opportunities provided by Rare Book School, such as the Lang Fellowship. Ken Grossi and Ed Vermue: Building Professional CommunityWe all need our people. This dialogue will explore how one can share and support a cohort of colleagues across the disciplines to maintain this critical work. Anne Cuyler Salsich, Megan Mitchell, and Heath Patten: Discoverability, Presentation and Promotion of Your Existing CollectionsThis session explores questions of outreach and how to present and promote your existing objects with faculty and students. Angela Vanden Elzen: Making as Pedagogy with Makerspaces and Digital GamingWe will review the concept of making as pedagogy with makerspaces, digital projects, and exhibitions and how to engage students, faculty, and the community in this growing area

The Bookworm, the Eaglestone and the Esquire, or: How an Eccentric Collector’s House Grew into a National Book Museum

Talk by Rickey Tax, Acting Director of the Meermanno Museum, The Hague, co-sponsored by the Oberlin College Book Studies Committee and The Friends of the Oberlin College Library

The Bookworm, the Eaglestone and the Esquire, or: How an Eccentric Collector’s House Grew into a National Book Museum

Talk by Rickey Tax, Acting Director of the Meermanno Museum, The Hague, co-sponsored by the Oberlin College Book Studies Committee and The Friends of the Oberlin College Library

Data from: Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

This record contains the underlying research data for the publication "Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science" and the full-text is available from: https://ink.library.smu.edu.sg/lkcsb_research/5257Reproducibility is a defining feature of science, but the extent to which it characterizes current research is unknown. We conducted replications of 100 experimental and correlational studies published in three psychology journals using high-powered designs and original materials when available. Replication effects were half the magnitude of original effects, representing a substantial decline. Ninety-seven percent of original studies had statistically significant results. Thirty-six percent of replications had statistically significant results; 47% of original effect sizes were in the 95% confidence interval of the replication effect size; 39% of effects were subjectively rated to have replicated the original result; and if no bias in original results is assumed, combining original and replication results left 68% with statistically significant effects. Correlational tests suggest that replication success was better predicted by the strength of original evidence than by characteristics of the original and replication teams