Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation for the Treatment of Achalasia A Network Meta-Analysis

Objective: Comparison of short-and long-term effects after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) considering the need for retreatment. Background: Previously published studies have indicated that LHM is the most effective treatment for Achalasia. In contrast to that a recent randomized trial found EBD equivalent to LHM 2 years after initial treatment. Methods: A search in Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted for prospective studies on interventional achalasia therapy with predefined exclusion criteria. Data on success rates after the initial and repeated treatment were extracted. An adjusted network meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis was used, combined with a headto-head comparison, for follow-up at 12, 24, and 60 months. Results: Sixteen studies including results of 590 LHM and EBD patients were identified. Odds ratio (OR) was 2.20 at 12 months (95% confidence interval: 1.18-4.09; P = 0.01); 5.06 at 24 months (2.61-9.80; P < 0.00001) and 29.83 at 60 months (3.96-224.68; P = 0.001). LHM was also significantly superior for all time points when therapy included re-treatments , and 17.90 (2.17-147.98); P ≤ 0.01 for all comparisons) Complication rates were not significantly different. Meta-regression analysis showed that amount of dilations had a significant impact on treatment effects (P = 0.009). Every dilation (up to 3) improved treatment effect by 11.9% (2.8%-21.8%). Conclusions: In this network meta-analysis, LHM demonstrated superior short-and long-term efficacy and should be considered first-line treatment of esophageal achalasia. Keywords: achalasia, economic cost, endoscopy, esophagus, health, idiopathic achalasia, laparoscopic surgery, meta-analysis, motility disorders, network meta-analysis, review, surgery (Ann Surg 2013;258:943-952 A chalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder caused by degeneration of the myenteric plexus, resulting in esophageal dysmotility and incomplete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation. The disease is likely caused by a virus-induced autoimmune response, but this is still debated. 1 The incidence in the Western world is 1/100 000. 2-4 Treatment can be pharmacological, endoscopic, or surgical. Pharmacological treatment is only marginally effective and is reserved for patients with mild symptoms or who refuse other treatments. 7-9 Several studies and a large meta-analysis have indicated that laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) is the most effective treatment for achalasia. 3,4,10 However, a recent large prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing EBD and LHM has challenged this view. 11 This study found similar success rates for EBD and LHM 2 years after initial treatment. However, the number of EBD interventions per patient was notably higher than other studies. 3,11 The purpose of this meta-analysis is to determine which treatment is most effective at relieving symptoms and to further clarify the impact of retreatments for patients with achalasia. METHODS This meta-analysis was registered in the international register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42012002071). 12 Search Strategy and Trial Selection A prospective search of Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed to identify relevant publications. The search keyword was "Esophageal Achalasia." Subsequently, the search was limited by the terms "Human," "Clinical Trial," and publication language "English." Publications from 1975 through October 2011 were considered for review To obtain indirect evidence by adjusted network meta-analysis, relative evidence is needed (LHM vs X; EBD vs X). Therefore, success rates were compared with those of either EBTI or open Heller myotomy (OHM). Direct evidence was achieved from head-to-hea

Defining competencies for safe thyroidectomy: An international Delphi consensus

BACKGROUND: Current methods for teaching and assessing competencies that characterize expert intraoperative performance are inconsistent, subjective, and lack standardization. This mixed-methods study was designed to define and establish expert consensus on the most important competencies required to perform a thyroidectomy safely. METHODS: Cognitive task analyses for thyroidectomy were performed with semistructured interviews of experts in thyroid surgery. Verbal data were transcribed verbatim, coded, and categorized according to themes that were synthesized into a list of items. Once qualitative data reached saturation, 26 experts were invited to complete 2-round online Delphi surveys to rank each item on a Likert scale of importance (1-7). Consensus was predefined as a Cronbach\u27s α ≥ 0.80. RESULTS: Sixty items were synthesized from 5 interviews and categorized into 8 sections: preparation (n = 8), incision/exposure (n = 11), general considerations (n = 4), middle thyroid vein (n = 1), superior pole (n = 5), inferior pole (n = 5), posterolateral dissection (n = 19), and closure (n = 7). Eighteen (69%) experts from 3 countries participated in the Delphi survey. Consensus was achieved after 2 voting rounds (Cronbach\u27s α = 0.95). Greatest weighted sections included Superior Pole Dissection and Posterolateral Dissection. CONCLUSION: Consensus was achieved on defining the most important competencies for safe thyroidectomy. This blueprint serves as the basis for instructional design and objective assessment tools to evaluate performance

Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: an international prospective multicenter study

Pilot studies have indicated that peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) might be a safe and effective treatment for achalasia. We performed a prospective, international, multicenter study to determine the outcomes of 70 patients who underwent POEM at 5 centers in Europe and North America. Three months after POEM, 97% of patients were in symptom remission (95% confidence interval, 89%-99%); symptom scores were reduced from 7 to 1 (P < .001) and lower esophageal sphincter pressures were reduced from 28 to 9 mm Hg (P < .001). The percentage of patients in symptom remission at 6 and 12 months was 89% and 82%, respectively. POEM was found to be an effective treatment for achalasia after a mean follow-up period of 10 month