18 research outputs found
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy
Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) represents a noninvasive technology
that allows visualization of the colon without requiring sedation and air
insufflation. A second-generation colon capsule endoscopy system (PillCam Colon
2) (CCE-2) was developed to increase sensitivity for colorectal polyp detection
compared with the first-generation system. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility,
accuracy, and safety of CCE-2 in a head-to-head comparison with colonoscopy.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, multicenter trial including 8 European sites.
PATIENTS: This study involved 117 patients (mean age 60 years). Data from 109
patients were analyzed. INTERVENTION: CCE-2 was prospectively compared with
conventional colonoscopy as the criterion standard for the detection of
colorectal polyps that are >/=6 mm or masses in a cohort of patients at average
or increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Colonoscopy was independently
performed within 10 hours after capsule ingestion or on the next day. MAIN
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: CCE-2 sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients
with polyps >/=6 mm and >/=10 mm were assessed. Capsule-positive but
colonoscopy-negative cases were counted as false positive. Capsule excretion
rate, level of bowel preparation, and rate of adverse events also were assessed.
RESULTS: Per-patient CCE-2 sensitivity for polyps >/=6 mm and >/=10 mm was 84%
and 88%, with specificities of 64% and 95%, respectively. All 3 invasive
carcinomas were detected by CCE-2. The capsule excretion rate was 88% within 10
hours. Overall colon cleanliness for CCE-2 was adequate in 81% of patients.
LIMITATIONS: Not unblinding the CCE-2 results at colonoscopy; heterogenous
patient population; nonconsecutive patients. CONCLUSION: In this European,
multicenter study, CCE-2 appeared to have a high sensitivity for the detection of
clinically relevant polypoid lesions, and it might be considered an adequate tool
for colorectal imaging
Multiple sclerosis genomic map implicates peripheral immune cells and microglia in susceptibility
Current thinking on the pathogenesis of endometriosis.
This manuscript is a review of new ideas regarding the pathogenesis of peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and retroperitoneal adenomyosis. Peritoneal endometriosis, the different aspects of which (black, red and white) represent distinctive steps in the evolutionary process, can be explained by the transplantation theory. Red lesions are the most active and most highly vascularized lesions and are considered to be the first stage of peritoneal endometriosis. The retroperitoneal nodule is an adenomyotic nodule whose histopathogenesis is not related to the implantation of regurgitated endometrial cells but to metaplasia of Müllerian remnants located in the rectovaginal septum. Metaplastic changes of Müllerian rests into adenomyotic glands involving the rectovaginal septum and the retroperitoneal space are responsible for the striking proliferation of the smooth muscle, creating an adenomyomatous appearance similar to that of adenomyosis in the endometrium
Detection of fastidious mycobacteria in human intestines by the polymerase chain reaction
SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
Experience With Medical Treatment of Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy (CSEP) With Local Ultrasound-Guided Injection of Methotrexate
OBJECTIVE: Ectopic pregnancy within Cesarean section scars is a rare condition. Late diagnosis carries significant risk of bleeding with poor prognosis for survival. There is no consensus on the management of this type of pregnancy. Historically, our facility offered an intra-muscular injection of methotrexate that resulted in a significant failure rate and later need for surgery. We hypothesized that injecting methotrexate directly into the gestational sac would improve the success rate of the treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective, uni-centric study examined nine patients aged between 33 and 42 years (mean age = 36.5 years) with Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) between 2010 and 2018. CSEP was diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound at a mean gestational age of 8w0/7. CSEP was treated under general anesthetic by ultrasound-guided methotrexate injection directly into the gestational sac. HCG levels and subsequent childbearing were monitored post-treatment. RESULTS: Half of the patients were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. All patients tolerated treatment well and all ectopic pregnancies were successfully removed. HCG levels returned to negative within 3 months without additional medical or surgical intervention. The post-treatment pregnancy rate was 50%. DISCUSSIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that local ultrasound-guided injection of methotrexate into the gestational sac is a safe and effective therapeutic approach when performed by a trained team on a hemodynamically stable patient in the early stages of CSEP
Safety of switching systemic steroids to budesonide modified-release capsules in steroid-dependent patients with inactive Crohn's disease
Centralizing surgery for ovarian cancer in a ‘non-centralizing’ country (Belgium): the UNGO (UCLouvain Network of Gynaecological Oncology) experience
Objective In Belgium there is no centralization of surgery for ovarian cancer, with more than 100 centers treating around 800 cases per year. In 2017 a network with several collaborating hospitals was established to centralize surgery for ovarian cancer (UCLouvain Network of Gynecological Oncology; UNGO) following publication of the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) recommendations and quality criteria for surgery of advanced ovarian cancer. We obtained ESGO accreditation in 2019. Methods We retrospectively collected data associated with patients undergoing surgery in our institution from 2007 to 2016, before the creation of the network (cohort 1) and, following the establishment of UNGO (2017–2021), patients undergoing surgery were prospectively registered in a REDCap database (cohort 2). The outcomes of the two cohorts were compared. Results A total of 314 patients underwent surgery in our institution from 2007 and 2021: 7.5 patients/year in cohort 1 (retrospective, 2007–2016) and 40.8 patients/year in cohort 2 (after network creation, 2017–2021). Median disease-free survival was increased from 16.5 months (range 13.2–20.4) in cohort 1 to 27.1 months (range 21.5–33.2) in cohort 2 (p=0.0004). In cohort 2, the rate of patients with residual disease at the end of the surgery was significantly less (18.7% vs 8.8%, p=0.023), although more patients in cohort 1 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (89% vs 54%, p<0.001). However, there was a higher rate of complications in the patients in cohort 2 (18.8% vs 30%, p=0.041). Conclusion Our study shows that, with the help of ESGO and its recommendations, we have been able to create an efficient advanced ovarian cancer centralized network and this may provide an improvement in the quality of care
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy
Background: Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) represents a noninvasive technology that allows visualization of the colon without requiring sedation and air insufflation. A second-generation colon capsule endoscopy system (PillCam Colon 2) (CCE-2) was developed to increase sensitivity for colorectal polyp detection compared with the first-generation system. Objective: To assess the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of CCE-2 in a head-to-head comparison with colonoscopy. Design and Setting: Prospective, multicenter trial including 8 European sites. Patients: This study involved 117 patients (mean age 60 years). Data from 109 patients were analyzed. Intervention: CCE-2 was prospectively compared with conventional colonoscopy as the criterion standard for the detection of colorectal polyps that are ≥6 mm or masses in a cohort of patients at average or increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Colonoscopy was independently performed within 10 hours after capsule ingestion or on the next day. Main Outcome Measurements: CCE-2 sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients with polyps ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm were assessed. Capsule-positive but colonoscopy-negative cases were counted as false positive. Capsule excretion rate, level of bowel preparation, and rate of adverse events also were assessed. Results: Per-patient CCE-2 sensitivity for polyps ≥6 mm and ≥10 mm was 84% and 88%, with specificities of 64% and 95%, respectively. All 3 invasive carcinomas were detected by CCE-2. The capsule excretion rate was 88% within 10 hours. Overall colon cleanliness for CCE-2 was adequate in 81% of patients. Limitations: Not unblinding the CCE-2 results at colonoscopy; heterogenous patient population; nonconsecutive patients. Conclusion: In this European, multicenter study, CCE-2 appeared to have a high sensitivity for the detection of clinically relevant polypoid lesions, and it might be considered an adequate tool for colorectal imaging. © 2011 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.SCOPUS: ar.jinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishe
Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy
Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) represents a noninvasive technology
that allows visualization of the colon without requiring sedation and air
insufflation. A second-generation colon capsule endoscopy system (PillCam Colon
2) (CCE-2) was developed to increase sensitivity for colorectal polyp detection
compared with the first-generation system. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility,
accuracy, and safety of CCE-2 in a head-to-head comparison with colonoscopy.
DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, multicenter trial including 8 European sites.
PATIENTS: This study involved 117 patients (mean age 60 years). Data from 109
patients were analyzed. INTERVENTION: CCE-2 was prospectively compared with
conventional colonoscopy as the criterion standard for the detection of
colorectal polyps that are >/=6 mm or masses in a cohort of patients at average
or increased risk of colorectal neoplasia. Colonoscopy was independently
performed within 10 hours after capsule ingestion or on the next day. MAIN
OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: CCE-2 sensitivity and specificity for detecting patients
with polyps >/=6 mm and >/=10 mm were assessed. Capsule-positive but
colonoscopy-negative cases were counted as false positive. Capsule excretion
rate, level of bowel preparation, and rate of adverse events also were assessed.
RESULTS: Per-patient CCE-2 sensitivity for polyps >/=6 mm and >/=10 mm was 84%
and 88%, with specificities of 64% and 95%, respectively. All 3 invasive
carcinomas were detected by CCE-2. The capsule excretion rate was 88% within 10
hours. Overall colon cleanliness for CCE-2 was adequate in 81% of patients.
LIMITATIONS: Not unblinding the CCE-2 results at colonoscopy; heterogenous
patient population; nonconsecutive patients. CONCLUSION: In this European,
multicenter study, CCE-2 appeared to have a high sensitivity for the detection of
clinically relevant polypoid lesions, and it might be considered an adequate tool
for colorectal imaging