Tareas que promueven competencias matemáticas en estudiantes universitarios no matemáticos

En este trabajo presentamos un análisis de la idoneidad epistémica propuesta por el Enfoque Ontosemiótico (Godino, 2011), realizada a tareas de evaluación que permiten observar el logro de competencias matemáticas en el sentido de Freudenthal (1991), en estudiantes universitarios de Estudios Generales Letras (Marketing y Publicidad, Derecho, Historia, psicología, Geografía, Literatura) El objetivo es mostrar como la diversificación los contenidos matemáticos propuestos para las carreras universitarias que requieren competencias de modelamiento y análisis de datos relacionados con problemas de sus especialidades se evidencian en la ejecución de actividades que permiten la aplicación y aprendizajes matemáticos en los estudiantes. Nos focalizamos en la evaluación realizada mediante una rúbrica que guía la elaboración de una tarea que la denominamos “Trabajo por especialidad”

Escenarios para promover Competencias Matemáticas en la Universidad

This communication will show a view of scenarios to promote mathematical competences: general, referred to the mathematical content and the scope of demand, in students of the first cycle of General Studies of Letters that includes careers in the Social Sciences (Anthropology, Sociology) and Humanities ( Literature, Psychology, History, Geography, Linguistics, Philosophy) of a Peruvian university, from teaching experiments framed in the Realistic Mathematical Education (EMR) of Freudenthal (1991), planned, experimented and redesigned from the methodology of teaching design (Kelly, 2000; Rubio, 2012), considering the didactic suitability of EOS (Godino, Batanero and Font, 2009; Rubio, 2012). That is, we will show the routes that mathematical content must follow to reach future non-mathematical professionals (Gaita et al., 2009).En esta comunicación se mostrará una mirada de escenarios para promover competencias matemáticas: generales, referidas al contenido matemático y al ámbito de exigencia, en estudiantes del primer ciclo de estudios Generales Letras que incluye carreras de las Ciencias Sociales (Antropología, Sociología) y Humanas (Literatura, Psicología, Historia, Geografía, Linguística, Filosofía) de una universidad peruana, a partir de experimentos de enseñanza enmarcadas en la Educación Matemática Realista (EMR) de Freudenthal (1991), planificadas, experimentadasy rediseñadas desde la metodología de diseño de enseñanza (Kelly, 2000; Rubio, 2012), considerando la idoneidad didáctica del EOS (Godino, Batanero y Font, 2009; Rubio, 2012). Es decir, mostraremos los recorridos que deben seguir unos contenidos matemáticos para llegar a los futuros profesionales no matem´aticos (Gaita et al., 2009)

International eDelphi Study to Reach Consensus on the Methotrexate Dosing Regimen in Patients With Psoriasis

Abstract Importance: A clear dosing regimen for methotrexate in psoriasis is lacking, and this might lead to a suboptimal treatment. Because methotrexate is affordable and globally available, a uniform dosing regimen could potentially optimize the treatment of patients with psoriasis worldwide. Objective: To reach international consensus among psoriasis experts on a uniform dosing regimen for treatment with methotrexate in adult and pediatric patients with psoriasis and identify potential future research topics. Design, setting, and participants: Between September 2020 and March 2021, a survey study with a modified eDelphi procedure that was developed and distributed by the Amsterdam University Medical Center and completed by 180 participants worldwide (55 [30.6%] resided in non-Western countries) was conducted in 3 rounds. The proposals on which no consensus was reached were discussed in a conference meeting (June 2021). Participants voted on 21 proposals with a 9-point scale (1-3 disagree, 4-6 neither agree nor disagree, 7-9 agree) and were recruited through the Skin Inflammation and Psoriasis International Network and European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in June 2020. Apart from being a dermatologist/dermatology resident, there were no specific criteria for participation in the survey. The participants worked mainly at a university hospital (97 [53.9%]) and were experienced in treating patients with psoriasis with methotrexate (163 [91.6%] had more than 10 years of experience). Main outcomes and measures: In a survey with eDelphi procedure, we tried to reach consensus on 21 proposals. Consensus was defined as less than 15% voting disagree (1-3). For the consensus meeting, consensus was defined as less than 30% voting disagree. Results: Of 251 participants, 180 (71.7%) completed all 3 survey rounds, and 58 participants (23.1%) joined the conference meeting. Consensus was achieved on 11 proposals in round 1, 3 proposals in round 2, and 2 proposals in round 3. In the consensus meeting, consensus was achieved on 4 proposals. More research is needed, especially for the proposals on folic acid and the dosing of methotrexate for treating subpopulations such as children and vulnerable patients. Conclusions and relevance: In this eDelphi consensus study, consensus was reached on 20 of 21 proposals involving methotrexate dosing in patients with psoriasis. This consensus may potentially be used to harmonize the treatment with methotrexate in patients with psoriasis

International eDelphi Study to Reach Consensus on the Methotrexate Dosing Regimen in Patients with Psoriasis

Importance: A clear dosing regimen for methotrexate in psoriasis is lacking, and this might lead to a suboptimal treatment. Because methotrexate is affordable and globally available, a uniform dosing regimen could potentially optimize the treatment of patients with psoriasis worldwide. Objective: To reach international consensus among psoriasis experts on a uniform dosing regimen for treatment with methotrexate in adult and pediatric patients with psoriasis and identify potential future research topics. Design, Setting, and Participants: Between September 2020 and March 2021, a survey study with a modified eDelphi procedure that was developed and distributed by the Amsterdam University Medical Center and completed by 180 participants worldwide (55 [30.6%] resided in non-Western countries) was conducted in 3 rounds. The proposals on which no consensus was reached were discussed in a conference meeting (June 2021). Participants voted on 21 proposals with a 9-point scale (1-3 disagree, 4-6 neither agree nor disagree, 7-9 agree) and were recruited through the Skin Inflammation and Psoriasis International Network and European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology in June 2020. Apart from being a dermatologist/dermatology resident, there were no specific criteria for participation in the survey. The participants worked mainly at a university hospital (97 [53.9%]) and were experienced in treating patients with psoriasis with methotrexate (163 [91.6%] had more than 10 years of experience). Main Outcomes and Measures: In a survey with eDelphi procedure, we tried to reach consensus on 21 proposals. Consensus was defined as less than 15% voting disagree (1-3). For the consensus meeting, consensus was defined as less than 30% voting disagree. Results: Of 251 participants, 180 (71.7%) completed all 3 survey rounds, and 58 participants (23.1%) joined the conference meeting. Consensus was achieved on 11 proposals in round 1, 3 proposals in round 2, and 2 proposals in round 3. In the consensus meeting, consensus was achieved on 4 proposals. More research is needed, especially for the proposals on folic acid and the dosing of methotrexate for treating subpopulations such as children and vulnerable patients. Conclusions and Relevance: In this eDelphi consensus study, consensus was reached on 20 of 21 proposals involving methotrexate dosing in patients with psoriasis. This consensus may potentially be used to harmonize the treatment with methotrexate in patients with psoriasis.