53 research outputs found
Gonadotropin-releasing hormone increased pregnancy risk in suckled beef cows not detected in estrus and subjected to a split-time artificial insemination program
Citation: Hill, S. L., Grieger, D. M., Olson, K. C., Jaeger, J. R., Dahlen, C. R., Crosswhite, M. R., . . . Stevenson, J. S. (2016). Gonadotropin-releasing hormone increased pregnancy risk in suckled beef cows not detected in estrus and subjected to a split-time artificial insemination program. Journal of Animal Science, 94(9), 3722-3728. doi:10.2527/jas2016-0582We hypothesized that GnRH would increase pregnancy risk (PR) in a split-time AI program for cows in which estrus was not detected. A total of 1,236 suckled beef cows at 12 locations in 3 states (Colorado, Kansas, and North Dakota) were enrolled. Before applying the fixed-time AI program, BCS was assessed. Cows were treated on d -7 with a progesterone insert concurrent with 100 mu g GnRH and on d 0 with 25 mg PGF(2 alpha) plus removal of the insert. Estrus-detection patches were affixed to cows at insert removal. Estrus was defined to have occurred when an estrus-detection patch was >50% colored (activated). Cows in estrus by 65 h (n = 758; 61.3% of all cows) were randomly allocated to 2 treatments: 1) 100 mu g GnRH and early + GnRH (E+G; n = 373) or 2) AI only at 65 h (early -no GnRH [E-G]; n = 385). The remaining cows were randomly allocated to 2 treatments: 1) 5(L+G; n = 252) or 2) AI only at 84 h (late no GnRH [L-G]; n = 226). Pregnancy was determined 35 d after AI via transrectal ultrasound. Pregnancy risk did not differ (P = 0.68) between E+G and E-G cows (61.9 vs. 60.4%, respectively). Conversely, for cows inseminated at 84 h, PR was greater (P = 0.01) in cows that received GnRH (L+G) compared with their herd mates not receiving GnRH (L-G; 41.7 vs. 30.8%, respectively). Of those cows not detected in estrus by 65 h, 42.1% were detected by 84 h, for a total expression of estrus by all cows of 77.6%. Administration of GnRH increased (P < 0.01) PR in cows not detected in estrus by 84 h (+ GnRH = 33.4% [n = 146] vs. no GnRH = 15.0% [n = 128]) but had no effect in cows expressing estrus by 84 h (+ GnRH = 65.3% [n = 103] vs. no GnRH = 61.7% [n = 97]). Neither estrus expression by 65 or 84 h nor PR was influenced by BCS, parity, or days postpartum at AI. Cows had greater PR when they had been detected in estrus before AI, and PR was improved by administration of GnRH at 65 h after insert removal in cows that were not detected in estrus and inseminated at 84 h
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Increased Pregnancy in Suckled Beef Cows Not Detected in Estrus and Subjected to a Split-Time Artificial Insemination Program
Estrus-synchronization programs allow insemination of all females in a herd at one fixed time on the first day of the breeding season. Inseminating cows after they have expressed estrus increases pregnancy rate (PR) compared with cows that do not display estrus in a timed AI (TAI) program. Identification of estrus status can be facilitated by using estrus-detection patches. Varying AI timing according to estrus status has increased PR in some previous studies. Reducing the number of injections in a TAI program decreases labor requirements, stress on cows, and overall cost of the program. Previous studies have demonstrated that PR is not compromised in cows displaying estrus when the GnRH injection administered at AI is eliminated. A split-time AI program decreases the time between estrus expression and insemination compared with a single fixed-time AI when the first AI occurs before the recommended standard 60- to 66-h fixed time. Previous research has demonstrated that delaying AI results in approximately 50% more cows displaying estrus when compared with a single insemination time. Eliminating the GnRH injection at AI for cows displaying estrus in a split TAI program can reduce the number of GnRH injections required and the program cost. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that GnRH injection concurrent with split TAI program improves PR only in cows not displaying estrus
Respectful leadership:Reducing performance challenges posed by leader role incongruence and gender dissimilarity
We investigate how respectful leadership can help overcome the challenges for follower performance that female leaders face when working (especially with male) followers. First, based on role congruity theory, we illustrate the biases faced by female leaders. Second, based on research on gender (dis-)similarity, we propose that these biases should be particularly pronounced when working with a male follower. Finally, we propose that respectful leadership is most conducive to performance in female leader–male follower dyads compared with all other gender configurations. A multi-source field study (N = 214) provides partial support for our hypothesis. While our hypothesized effect was confirmed, respectful leadership seems to be generally effective for female leaders irrespective of follower gender, thus lending greater support in this context to the arguments of role congruity rather than gender dissimilarity
Molecular mechanisms of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a new infectious disease caused by a novel coronavirus that leads to deleterious pulmonary pathological features. Due to its high morbidity and mortality and widespread occurrence, SARS has evolved as an important respiratory disease which may be encountered everywhere in the world. The virus was identified as the causative agent of SARS due to the efforts of a WHO-led laboratory network. The potential mutability of the SARS-CoV genome may lead to new SARS outbreaks and several regions of the viral genomes open reading frames have been identified which may contribute to the severe virulence of the virus. With regard to the pathogenesis of SARS, several mechanisms involving both direct effects on target cells and indirect effects via the immune system may exist. Vaccination would offer the most attractive approach to prevent new epidemics of SARS, but the development of vaccines is difficult due to missing data on the role of immune system-virus interactions and the potential mutability of the virus. Even in a situation of no new infections, SARS remains a major health hazard, as new epidemics may arise. Therefore, further experimental and clinical research is required to control the disease
Calf Diarrhea (Scours): Reproduced with a Virus from a Field Outbreak
Neonatal calf diarrhea typical of that seen in field cases was produced in colostrum-deprived calves by inoculating either feces or bacteria-free filtrates via the duodenum, orally, or by a spray (aerosol). Three calves, kept free of E. coli, developed severe diarrhea following inoculation with a bacteria-free filtrate. Intense fluorescence in the epithelium of sections of small intestine from two experimental calves was observed following staining with ftuorescein-labeled gamma globulin produced with viral antigen prepared from the feces of two experimental diarrhetic E. coli-free calves. Fluorescing cells were also present in the feces of experimental and field cases of neonatal calf diarrhea. The etiologic agent of the calf diarrhea reported here is believed to be a virus, observed by electron microscopy, having a diameter of approximately 65 mμ
- …