8 research outputs found
Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study
Despite current guidelines, intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery remains widespread. Drains were not associated with earlier detection of intraperitoneal collections, but were associated with prolonged hospital stay and increased risk of surgical-site infections.Background Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice. Methods COMPASS (COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery) was a prospective, international, cohort study which enrolled consecutive adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery (February to March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included: rate and time to diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections; rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); time to discharge; and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade at least III). After propensity score matching, multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to estimate the independent association of the secondary outcomes with drain placement. Results Overall, 1805 patients from 22 countries were included (798 women, 44.2 per cent; median age 67.0 years). The drain insertion rate was 51.9 per cent (937 patients). After matching, drains were not associated with reduced rates (odds ratio (OR) 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 0.79 to 2.23; P = 0.287) or earlier detection (hazard ratio (HR) 0.87, 0.33 to 2.31; P = 0.780) of collections. Although not associated with worse major postoperative complications (OR 1.09, 0.68 to 1.75; P = 0.709), drains were associated with delayed hospital discharge (HR 0.58, 0.52 to 0.66; P < 0.001) and an increased risk of SSIs (OR 2.47, 1.50 to 4.05; P < 0.001). Conclusion Intraperitoneal drain placement after elective colorectal surgery is not associated with earlier detection of postoperative collections, but prolongs hospital stay and increases SSI risk
A case of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Brainstem involvement [Nöromiyelitis optika spektrum bozuklu?u olgusu: Beyinsapi{dotless} tutulumu]
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), or Devic's disease, which mainly affects the optic nerves and the spinal cord, is differentiated from the other demyelinating diseases by presence of NMO IgG/antiaquoporin-4 antibody (Anti-AQP4 Ab), poor prognosis, and absence of CSF oligoclonal IgG bands. Patients who do not meet the criteria for definite NMO, are considered as NMO spectrum disorders (NMOsd). Brain MRI lesions suggestive of NMO may be considered as an alternate supportive evidence for the diagnosis of NMOsd in patients with recurrent optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), recurrent brainstem, hypothalamic or encephalopathy symptoms, and AQP4-IgG seronegative status. We present a case with involvement of brainstem and cervical spinal cord and with NMO IgG positivity who considered as NMOsd together with the relevant literature
A case of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Brainstem involvement [Nöromiyelitis optika spektrum bozukluÄu olgusu: Beyinsapi{dotless} tutulumu]
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO), or Devic's disease, which mainly affects the optic nerves and the spinal cord, is differentiated from the other demyelinating diseases by presence of NMO IgG/antiaquoporin-4 antibody (Anti-AQP4 Ab), poor prognosis, and absence of CSF oligoclonal IgG bands. Patients who do not meet the criteria for definite NMO, are considered as NMO spectrum disorders (NMOsd). Brain MRI lesions suggestive of NMO may be considered as an alternate supportive evidence for the diagnosis of NMOsd in patients with recurrent optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), recurrent brainstem, hypothalamic or encephalopathy symptoms, and AQP4-IgG seronegative status. We present a case with involvement of brainstem and cervical spinal cord and with NMO IgG positivity who considered as NMOsd together with the relevant literature
Characterization of protein kinases forming acid-labile histone phosphates in Walker-256 carcinosarcoma cell nuclei
Calcium-dependent unmasking of active center cysteine during activation of fibrin stabilizing factor
Intraperitoneal drain placement and outcomes after elective colorectal surgery: international matched, prospective, cohort study
Many surgeons routinely place intraperitoneal drains after elective colorectal surgery. However, enhanced recovery after surgery guidelines recommend against their routine use owing to a lack of clear clinical benefit. This study aimed to describe international variation in intraperitoneal drain placement and the safety of this practice
Safety and efficacy of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery. An international, prospective cohort study
Intraperitoneal drains are often placed during emergency colorectal surgery. However, there is a lack of evidence supporting their use. This study aimed to describe the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal drain placement after emergency colorectal surgery. Method: COMPlicAted intra-abdominal collectionS after colorectal Surgery (COMPASS) is a prospective, international, cohort study into which consecutive adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery were enrolled (from 3 February 2020 to 8 March 2020). The primary outcome was the rate of intraperitoneal drain placement. Secondary outcomes included rate and time-to-diagnosis of postoperative intraperitoneal collections, rate of surgical site infections (SSIs), time to discharge and 30-day major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo III-V). Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the independent association of the outcomes with drain placement. Results: Some 725 patients (median age 68.0âyears; 349 [48.1%] women) from 22 countries were included. The drain insertion rate was 53.7% (389 patients). Following multivariable adjustment, drains were not significantly associated with reduced rates (odds ratio [OR] =â1.56, 95% CI: 0.48-5.02, pâ=â0.457) or earlier detection (hazard ratio [HR] =â1.07, 95% CI: 0.61-1.90, pâ=â0.805) of collections. Drains were not significantly associated with worse major postoperative complications (ORâ=â1.26, 95% CI: 0.67-2.36, pâ=â0.478), delayed hospital discharge (HRâ=â1.11, 95% CI: 0.91-1.36, pâ=â0.303) or increased risk of SSIs (ORâ=â1.61, 95% CI: 0.87-2.99, pâ=â0.128). Conclusion: This is the first study investigating placement of intraperitoneal drains following emergency colorectal surgery. The safety and clinical benefit of drains remain uncertain. Equipoise exists for randomized trials to define the safety and efficacy of drains in emergency colorectal surgery