Nadolol decreases the incidence and severity of ventricular arrhythmias during exercise stress testing compared with β1-selective β-blockers in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

BackgroundCatecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) is an inheritable cardiac disease predisposing to malignant ventricular arrhythmias.ObjectiveWe aimed to explore the incidence and severity of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CPVT before the initiation of β-blocker treatment, when treated with β1-selective β-blockers, and when treated with nadolol.MethodsIn this study, 34 patients with CPVT were included (mean age 34 ± 19 years; 15 (44%) women; 30 (88%) ryanodine receptor 2 variant positive). We performed 3 bicycle exercise stress tests in each patient: (1) before the initiation of β-blocker treatment, (2) after >6 weeks of treatment with β1-selective β-blockers and (3) after >6 weeks of treatment with nadolol. We recorded resting and maximum heart rates and the most severe ventricular arrhythmia occurring. Severity of arrhythmias was scored as 1 point for no arrhythmias or only single ventricular extrasystoles, 2 points for >10 ventricular extrasystoles per minute or bigeminy, 3 points for couplets, and 4 points for nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or sustained ventricular tachycardia.ResultsResting heart rate was similar during treatment with nadolol and β1-selective β-blockers (54 ± 10 beats/min vs 56 ± 14 beats/min; P = .50), while maximum heart rate was lower during treatment with nadolol compared with β1-selective β-blockers (122 ± 21 beats/min vs 139 ± 24 beats/min; P = .001). Arrhythmias during exercise stress testing were less severe during treatment with nadolol compared with during treatment with β1-selective β-blockers (arrhythmic score 1.6 ± 0.9 vs 2.5 ± 0.8; P < .001) and before the initiation of β-blocker treatment (arrhythmic score 1.6 ± 0.9 vs 2.7 ± 0.9; P = .001); however, no differences were observed during treatment with β1-selective β-blockers compared with before the initiation of β-blocker treatment (arrhythmic score 2.5 ± 0.8 vs 2.7 ± 0.9; P = .46).ConclusionThe incidence and severity of ventricular arrhythmias decreased during treatment with nadolol compared with during treatment with β1-selective β-blockers. β1-Selective β-blockers did not change the occurrence or severity of arrhythmias compared with no medication

Data on exercise and cardiac imaging in a patient cohort with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Data presented in this paper are supplementary material to our study âVigorous exercise in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathyâ [1]. The current article presents supplementary data on collection and analyses of exercise parameters and genetic data in the original research article. Keywords: Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, Exercise, Genetics, Arrhythmi

Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Deformation Parameters in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Pilot Study of the Usefulness of Strain Echocardiography

Background: In patients with aortic stenosis, subtle alterations in myocardial mechanics can be detected by speckle-tracking echocardiography before reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Methods: In this prospective study, 162 patients with aortic stenosis with an average aortic valve area of 0.7 ± 0.2 cm2 and a mean LVEF of 60 ± 11% were included. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mechanical dispersion (SD of time from Q/R on the electrocardiogram to peak strain in 16 left ventricular segments) were assessed using echocardiography, and all-cause mortality (n = 37) was recorded during 37 ± 13 months of follow-up. Results: Overall, nonsurvivors had more pronounced mechanical dispersion and worse GLS compared with survivors (74 ± 24 vs 61 ± 18 msec [P < .01] and −14.5 ± 4.4% vs −16.7 ± 3.6% [P < .01], respectively). In the 42 conservatively treated patients without surgical aortic valve replacement, a similar pattern was observed in nonsurvivors versus survivors (mechanical dispersion, 80 ± 24 vs 57 ± 14 msec [P < .01]; GLS, −14.0 ± 4.9% vs −17.1 ± 3.8% [P = .04], respectively). Mechanical dispersion was significantly associated with mortality (hazard ratio per 10-msec increase, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07–1.42; P < .01) in a Cox model adjusted for LVEF and with aortic valve replacement treatment as a time-dependent covariate. Continuous net reclassification improvement showed that mechanical dispersion was incremental to LVEF, GLS, and valvulo-arterial impedance when adjusting for aortic valve replacement treatment in the total population. Conclusion: Increased mechanical dispersion may be a risk marker providing novel prognostic information in patients with aortic stenosis

Echo-Doppler estimation of left ventricular filling pressure: results of the multicentre EACVI Euro-Filling study

Aims: The present Euro-Filling report aimed at comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the 2009 and 2016 echocardiographic grading algorithms for predicting invasively measured left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP). Method and results: A total of 159 patients who underwent simultaneous evaluation of echo estimates of LVFP and invasive measurements of LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were enrolled at nine EACVI centres. Thirty-nine (25%) patients had a reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%), 77 (64%) were in NYHA ≥ II, and 85 (53%) had coronary artery disease. Sixty-four (40%) patients had elevated LVEDP (≥15 mmHg). Taken individually, all echocardiographic Doppler estimates of LVFP (E/A, E/e', left atrial volume, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity) were marginally correlated with LVEDP. By using the 2016 recommendations, 65% of patients with normal non-invasive estimate of LVFP had normal LVEDP, while 79% of those with elevated non-invasive LVFP had elevated invasive LVEDP. By using 2009 recommendations, 68% of the patients with normal non-invasive LVFP had normal LVEDP, while 55% of those with elevated non-invasive LVFP had elevated LVEDP. The 2016 recommendations (sensitivity 75%, specificity 74%, positive predictive value 39%, negative predictive value 93%, AUC 0.78) identified slightly better patients with elevated invasive LVEDP (≥ 15 mmHg) as compared with the 2009 recommendations (sensitivity 43%, specificity 75%, positive predictive value 49%, negative predictive value 71%, AUC 0.68). Conclusion: The present Euro-Filling study demonstrates that the new 2016 recommendations for assessing LVFP non-invasively are fairly reliable and clinically useful, as well as superior to the 2009 recommendations in estimating invasive LVEDP