135 research outputs found
Magnetocaloric effect and H gradient in bulk La(Fe,Si)13Hy magnetic refrigerants obtained by HDSH
Virtual reality gaming in rehabilitation after musculoskeletal injur: user experience pilot study
The purposes of this study were twofold: (1) to describe a new technological solution for
the rehabilitation of musculoskeletal injuries based on virtual reality (VR) gaming, and (2) to analyze
the variation in rated perceived exertion (RPE) and heart rate (HR) of the participants when
undergoing a rehabilitation session based on different VR games. Thirty-seven participants aged
23.7 ± 7.0 years tested during five customized VR games to provide a complete rehabilitation session
after a musculoskeletal injury. The results of the Friedman test indicated a statistically significant
difference in RPE scale and HR across the five VR games throughout a complete rehabilitation
session (χ2 (4, n = 35) = 75.59; p < 0.001 and χ2 (4, n = 35) = 27.75, p < 0.001, respectively). RPE and HR
increased significantly from Game 1 to Game 2 (z = –5.16, p < 0.001), from Game 1 to Game 3 (z = –
5.05, p < 0.001), from Game 1 to Game 4 (z = –4.87, p < 0.001), and from Game 1 to Game 5 (z = –3.61,
p < 0.001). Moreover, the results showed a high perceived usability of the system, greater intrinsic
motivation to perform the rehabilitation exercises, a high level of immersion, and a good experience
in the VR gaming environment. Our study stimulates extended intervention programs following up on this immersive virtual reality rehabilitation system to support soccer players recovering from
musculoskeletal injuries.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio
Análise de provas de seleção para ingresso em cursos da UFRJ quanto ao uso da abordagem CTS
..
A thioacetamide-induced hepatic encephalopathy model in C57BL/6 mice: a behavioral and neurochemical study
Metodologia para rastreamento com modificação dos zeros e rejeição de distúrbio aplicada a sistemas incertos
Perfil de ácidos graxos e teor de colesterol de mortadela elaborada com óleos vegetais
Situação atual da esquistossomose mansoni no Lago da Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
Determinants of recovery from post-COVID-19 dyspnoea: analysis of UK prospective cohorts of hospitalised COVID-19 patients and community-based controls
Background The risk factors for recovery from COVID-19 dyspnoea are poorly understood. We investigated determinants of recovery from dyspnoea in adults with COVID-19 and compared these to determinants of recovery from non-COVID-19 dyspnoea. Methods We used data from two prospective cohort studies: PHOSP-COVID (patients hospitalised between March 2020 and April 2021 with COVID-19) and COVIDENCE UK (community cohort studied over the same time period). PHOSP-COVID data were collected during hospitalisation and at 5-month and 1-year follow-up visits. COVIDENCE UK data were obtained through baseline and monthly online questionnaires. Dyspnoea was measured in both cohorts with the Medical Research Council Dyspnoea Scale. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify determinants associated with a reduction in dyspnoea between 5-month and 1-year follow-up. Findings We included 990 PHOSP-COVID and 3309 COVIDENCE UK participants. We observed higher odds of improvement between 5-month and 1-year follow-up among PHOSP-COVID participants who were younger (odds ratio 1.02 per year, 95% CI 1.01–1.03), male (1.54, 1.16–2.04), neither obese nor severely obese (1.82, 1.06–3.13 and 4.19, 2.14–8.19, respectively), had no pre-existing anxiety or depression (1.56, 1.09–2.22) or cardiovascular disease (1.33, 1.00–1.79), and shorter hospital admission (1.01 per day, 1.00–1.02). Similar associations were found in those recovering from non-COVID-19 dyspnoea, excluding age (and length of hospital admission). Interpretation Factors associated with dyspnoea recovery at 1-year post-discharge among patients hospitalised with COVID-19 were similar to those among community controls without COVID-19. Funding PHOSP-COVID is supported by a grant from the MRC-UK Research and Innovation and the Department of Health and Social Care through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) rapid response panel to tackle COVID-19. The views expressed in the publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the National Health Service (NHS), the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. COVIDENCE UK is supported by the UK Research and Innovation, the National Institute for Health Research, and Barts Charity. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funders
- …