11 research outputs found

    Tofacitinib versus methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis

    Get PDF
    Background : Methotrexate is the most frequently used first-line antirheumatic drug. We report the findings of a phase 3 study of monotherapy with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, as compared with methotrexate monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate. Methods : We randomly assigned 958 patients to receive 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily or methotrexate at a dose that was incrementally increased to 20 mg per week over 8 weeks; 956 patients received a study drug. The coprimary end points at month 6 were the mean change from baseline in the van der Heijde modified total Sharp score (which ranges from 0 to 448, with higher scores indicating greater structural joint damage) and the proportion of patients with an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 70 response (>= 70% reduction in the number of both tender and swollen joints and >= 70% improvement in three of five other criteria: the patient's assessment of pain, level of disability, C-reactive protein level or erythrocyte sedimentation rate, global assessment of disease by the patient, and global assessment of disease by the physician). Results : Mean changes in the modified total Sharp score from baseline to month 6 were significantly smaller in the tofacitinib groups than in the methotrexate group, but changes were modest in all three groups (0.2 points in the 5-mg tofacitinib group and <0.1 point in the 10-mg tofacitinib group, as compared with 0.8 points in the methotrexate group [ P<0.001 for both comparisons]). Among the patients receiving tofacitinib, 25.5% in the 5-mg group and 37.7% in the 10-mg group had an ACR 70 response at month 6, as compared with 12.0% of patients in the methotrexate group (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Herpes zoster developed in 31 of 770 patients who received tofacitinib (4.0%) and in 2 of 186 patients who received methotrexate (1.1%). Confirmed cases of cancer (including three cases of lymphoma) developed in 5 patients who received tofacitinib and in 1 patient who received methotrexate. Tofacitinib was associated with increases in creatinine levels and in low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Conclusions : In patients who had not previously received methotrexate or therapeutic doses of methotrexate, tofacitinib monotherapy was superior to methotrexate in reducing signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and inhibiting the progression of structural joint damage. The benefits of tofacitinib need to be considered in the context of the risks of adverse events

    Examination of the relationship between gaming disorder (GD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): a meta-analysis

    No full text
    We would like to conduct a meta-analysis examining the relationship between Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and Gaming Disorder (GD) symptoms

    Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo: patient-reported outcomes from a phase 3 study of active rheumatoid arthritis

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of tofacitinib or adalimumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with moderate to severe RA and inadequate responses to MTX. METHODS: In this 12-month, phase 3, randomized controlled trial (ORAL Standard), patients (n = 717) receiving background MTX were randomized to tofacitinib 5 or 10 mg twice daily (BID), adalimumab 40 mg once every 2 weeks or placebo. PROs included HAQ-Disability Index, Patient Global Assessment of Arthritis, Patient Assessment of Arthritis Pain, health-related quality of life (Short Form-36 [SF-36]), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue) and sleep (Medical Outcomes Study-Sleep). RESULTS: At month 3, tofacitinib 10 mg BID treatment resulted in significant changes from baseline vs placebo across all PROs, sustained to month 12, with the highest number of patients reporting improvements ⩾minimum clinically important differences vs placebo (P < 0.05). Changes from baseline at month 3 with tofacitinib 5 mg BID and adalimumab were similar and statistically significant vs placebo across most PROs, excluding SF-36 Mental Component Score and Social Functioning, Role Emotional, and Mental Health domains, with significantly more patients reporting improvements ⩾minimum clinically important differences. Numbers Needed to Treat were lowest for tofacitinib 10 mg BID and similar between tofacitinib 5 mg BID and adalimumab. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate to severe RA and inadequate responses to MTX reported improvements across a broad range of PROs with tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg BID and adalimumab that were significantly superior to placebo

    RIG-I inhibits the MAPK-dependent proliferation of BRAF mutant melanoma cells via MKP-1

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: BRAF-mutant melanoma is characterized by aggressive metastatic potential and therapeutic resistance. The innate immune receptor RIG-I has emerged as a potential target in melanoma therapies but the contributing pathways involved in anti-cancer activity are poorly characterized. METHODS: Baseline and ATRA-induced expression of RIG-I in nine (3 wild type and 6 BRAF-mutant) melanoma cell lines was measured with Q-PCR and Western blot. Ligand-specific stimulation of RIG-I was detected by Q-PCR and ELISA. Activation of the RIG-I-coupled IRF3, NF-kappaB and MAPK pathways was tested with protein array and Western blot. Cell proliferation and apoptosis was monitored by flow cytometry and cell counting. Down modulation of MKP-1 expression in melanoma cells was performed by specific siRNA. RESULTS: Short-term ATRA pre-treatment increases the expression of RIG-I in BRAF-mutant melanoma cells. Specific activation of RIG-I by 5'ppp-dsRNA leads to increased activity of the IRF3-IFNbeta pathway but does not influence NF-kappaB signaling. RIG-I mediates the targeted dephosphorylation of several MAPKs (p38, RSK1, GSK-3alpha/beta, HSP27) via the endogenous regulator MKP-1 resulting in decreased melanoma cell proliferation. CONCLUSION: RIG-I has the potential to exert anticancer activity in BRAF-mutant melanoma via controlling IFNbeta production and MAPK signaling. This is the first study showing that RIG-I activation results in MKP-1-mediated inhibition of cell proliferation via controlling the p38-HSP27, c-Jun and rpS6 pathways thus identifying RIG-I and MKP-1 as novel and promising therapeutical targets

    Muscarinic agonists inhibit the ATP-dependent potassium current and suppress the ventricle–Purkinje action potential dispersion

    No full text
    Activation of the parasympathetic nervous system has been reported to have an antiarrhythmic role during ischemia–reperfusion injury by decreasing the arrhythmia triggers. Furthermore, it was reported that the parasympathetic neurotransmitter acetylcholine is able to modulate the ATP-dependent potassium current (IK-ATP), a crucial current activated during hypoxia. However, the possible significance of this current modulation in the antiarrhythmic mechanism is not fully clarified. Action potentials were measured using the conventional microelectrode technique from canine left ventricular papillary muscle and free-running Purkinje fibers, under normal and hypoxic conditions. Ionic currents were measured using the whole-cell configuration of the patch-clamp method. Acetylcholine at 5 μmol/L did not influence the action potential duration (APD) either in Purkinje fibers or in papillary muscle preparations. In contrast, it significantly lengthened the APD and suppressed the Purkinje–ventricle APD dispersion when it was administered after 5 μmol/L pinacidil application. Carbachol at 3 μmol/L reduced the pinacidil-activated IK-ATP under voltage-clamp conditions. Acetylcholine lengthened the ventricular action potential under simulated ischemia condition. In this study, we found that acetylcholine inhibits the IK-ATP and thus suppresses the ventricle–Purkinje APD dispersion. We conclude that parasympathetic tone may reduce the arrhythmogenic substrate exerting a complex antiarrhythmic mechanism during hypoxic conditions.The accepted manuscript in pdf format is listed with the files at the bottom of this page. The presentation of the authors' names and (or) special characters in the title of the manuscript may differ slightly between what is listed on this page and what is listed in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript; that in the pdf file of the accepted manuscript is what was submitted by the author

    Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Tofacitinib (CP-690,550) is a novel oral Janus kinase inhibitor that is being investigated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS In this 12-month, phase 3 trial, 717 patients who were receiving stable doses of methotrexate were randomly assigned to 5 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily, 40 mg of adalimumab once every 2 weeks, or placebo. At month 3, patients in the placebo group who did not have a 20% reduction from baseline in the number of swollen and tender joints were switched in a blinded fashion to either 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib twice daily; at month 6, all patients still receiving placebo were switched to tofacitinib in a blinded fashion. The three primary outcome measures were a 20% improvement at month 6 in the American College of Rheumatology scale (ACR 20); the change from baseline to month 3 in the score on the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) (which ranges from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater disability); and the percentage of patients at month 6 who had a Disease Activity Score for 28-joint counts based on the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-4[ESR]) of less than 2.6 (with scores ranging from 0 to 9.4 and higher scores indicating greater disease activity). RESULTS At month 6, ACR 20 response rates were higher among patients receiving 5 mg or 10 mg of tofacitinib (51.5% and 52.6%, respectively) and among those receiving adalimumab (47.2%) than among those receiving placebo (28.3%) (P&lt;0.001 for all comparisons). There were also greater reductions in the HAQ-DI score at month 3 and higher percentages of patients with a DAS28-4(ESR) below 2.6 at month 6 in the active-treatment groups than in the placebo group. Adverse events occurred more frequently with tofacitinib than with placebo, and pulmonary tuberculosis developed in two patients in the 10-mg tofacitinib group. Tofacitinib was associated with an increase in both low-density and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and with reductions in neutrophil counts. CONCLUSIONS In patients with rheumatoid arthritis receiving background methotrexate, tofacitinib was significantly superior to placebo and was numerically similar to adalimumab in efficacy. (Funded by Pfizer; ORAL Standard ClinicalTrials.govnumber, NCT00853385.)Supported by Pfizer
    corecore