173 research outputs found

    Selective COX-2 inhibition with different doses of rofecoxib does not impair endothelial function in patients with coronary artery disease.

    Get PDF
    In this study, we investigated the effects of both 25 and 50 mg daily doses of rofecoxib on the endothelial functions of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). For this purpose, 34 patients with documented severe CAD and who were under aspirin treatment (300 mg/day) were randomized to receive 4 weeks of treatment with a placebo (n = 10, group I), rofecoxib 25 mg/day (n = 12, group II), and rofecoxib 50 mg/day (n = 12, group III). Brachial artery vasodilator responses were measured in order to evaluate endothelial function. The percentage of change in endothelial-dependent vasodilation in groups I, II, and III were similar at the baseline level and showed no significant change after treatment (6.2+/-3.9% vs. 5.9+/-3.1% and 5.8+/-3.3% vs. 5.6+/-3.8% and 6.1+/-4.5% vs. 5.8+/-4.1%, respectively; P &#62; 0.05). Compared with the baseline, endothelium-independent vasodilatation, as assessed by nitroglycerine (NTG), remained unchanged after the treatment period (11.2+/-6.9% vs. 10.3+/-7.1% and 11.2+/-6.3% vs. 9.9+/-5.1% and 9.5+/-4.9% and 8.8+/-4.6%, respectively; P&#62; 0.05). Treatment with both doses also showed no significant effects on high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels and resting arterial diameters (P &#62; 0.05). In conclusion, 4 weeks of treatment with standard and high doses of rofecoxib showed no significant effects on either endothelial-dependent or independent vasodilator response or plasma hs-CRP levels in patients with severe CAD taking concomitant aspirin.</p

    Involvement of the renin–angiotensin system in the development of vascular damage in a rat model of arthritis: Effect of angiotensin receptor blockers

    Full text link
    Objective To explore the involvement of the renin–angiotensin system (RAS) in the development of vascular damage in adjuvant-induced arthritis (AIA) in rats. Methods Angiotensin II (Ang II; 0.25 or 1.0 mg/kg/day) was infused in control rats and rats with AIA for 21 days, and the impact of systemic inflammation on Ang II–induced hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular hypertrophy was evaluated. Expression of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT 1 R) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in the aortas of rats with AIA were examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Western blot analyses. Losartan (3 mg/kg/day) or irbesartan (5 mg/kg/day), both of which are AT 1 R blockers, was administered orally to rats with AIA for 21 days. In situ superoxide production in aortas was assessed according to the fluorogenic oxidation of dihydroethidium to ethidium. The expression and activity of NAD(P)H oxidases in aortas were examined by real-time PCR analysis and lucigenin chemiluminescence assay. Endothelial function in rats with AIA treated in vivo or ex vivo with AT 1 R blockers was also determined. Results The Ang II–induced hypertensive response, endothelial dysfunction, and vascular hypertrophy were exacerbated in rats with AIA. Expression of AT 1 R and ACE was increased in the aortas of rats with AIA. Both losartan and irbesartan decreased the levels of superoxide and the expression and activity NAD(P)H oxidases in the aortas of rats with AIA. The endothelial dysfunction in AIA was improved by the in vivo or ex vivo treatment with AT 1 R blockers. Conclusion The locally activated RAS is involved in the increased vascular oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in AIA. Our findings have important implications for clinical approaches to the reduction of cardiovascular risk in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/75773/1/27384_ftp.pd

    Hyaluronic acid as a treatment for ankle osteoarthritis

    Get PDF
    Viscosupplementation refers to the concept of synovial fluid replacement with intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) for the relief of pain associated with osteoarthritis (OA). Intra-articular viscosupplementation was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1997. It is currently indicated only for the treatment of pain associated with knee OA. However, OA can occur in several of the weight-bearing joints of the foot and ankle. Ankle OA produces chronic disability that directly impacts the quality of life. There is only limited published literature relating to the use of HA in the ankle. This paper will review the authors’ experience, indications, clinical outcomes, and complications of viscosupplementation therapy in patients with ankle OA

    Comparison of intra-articular injections of Hyaluronic Acid and Corticosteroid in the treatment of Osteoarthritis of the hip in comparison with intra-articular injections of Bupivacaine. Design of a prospective, randomized, controlled study with blinding of the patients and outcome assessors

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although intra-articular hyaluronic acid is well established as a treatment for osteoarthritis of the knee, its use in hip osteoarthritis is not based on large randomized controlled trials. There is a need for more rigorously designed studies on hip osteoarthritis treatment as this subject is still very much under debate.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>Randomized, controlled trial with a three-armed, parallel-group design. Approximately 315 patients complying with the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be randomized into one of the following treatment groups: infiltration of the hip joint with hyaluronic acid, with a corticosteroid or with 0.125% bupivacaine.</p> <p>The following outcome measure instruments will be assessed at baseline, i.e. before the intra-articular injection of one of the study products, and then again at six weeks, 3 and 6 months after the initial injection: Pain (100 mm VAS), Harris Hip Score and HOOS, patient assessment of their clinical status (worse, stable or better then at the time of enrollment) and intake of pain rescue medication (number per week). In addition patients will be asked if they have complications/adverse events. The six-month follow-up period for all patients will begin on the date the first injection is administered.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This randomized, controlled, three-arm study will hopefully provide robust information on two of the intra-articular treatments used in hip osteoarthritis, in comparison to bupivacaine.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>NCT01079455</p

    The importance of disease associations and concomitant therapy for the long-term management of psoriasis patients

    Get PDF
    It is well established that several inflammatory-type conditions, such as arthritis, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and irritable bowel disease exist comorbidly and at an increased incidence in patients with psoriasis. Psoriasis and other associated diseases are thought to share common inflammatory pathways. Conditions such as these, with similar pathogenic mechanisms involving cytokine dysregulation, are referred to as immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). Considerable evidence for the genetic basis of cormobidities in psoriasis exists. The WHO has reported that the occurrence of chronic diseases, including IMIDs, are a rising global burden. In addition, conditions linked with psoriasis have been associated with increasing rates of considerable morbidity and mortality. The presence of comorbid conditions in psoriasis patients has important implications for clinical management. QoL, direct health care expenditures and pharmacokinetics of concomitant therapies are impacted by the presence of comorbid conditions. For example, methotrexate is contraindicated in hepatic impairment, while patients on ciclosporin should be monitored for kidney function. In addition, some agents, such as beta blockers, lithium, synthetic antimalarial drugs, NSAIDs and tetracycline antibiotics, have been implicated in the initiation or exacerbation of psoriasis. Consequently, collaboration between physicians in different specialties is essential to ensuring that psoriasis treatment benefits the patient without exacerbating associated conditions

    CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY

    No full text
    Observational studies suggest that statin use may be associated with lower incidence of fracture. However, there are conflicting data for their effects on bone remodeling parameters and bone mineral density (BMD). In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of simvastatin on bone metabolism and BMD in subjects with hypercholesterolemia (> 240 mg/dl). For this purpose, 32 postmenopausal osteopenic subjects who were given simvastatin treatment (20 mg/day) and not on osteoporosis treatment were included in the study. During the 1-year follow-up period, the total cholesterol level decreased from 262.1 +/- 30.9 to 202.2 +/- 30.1 mg/dl (p < 0.0001). At a period as early as the 3rd month, levels of the anabolic markers, e.g., bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and osteocalcin (OCL), were found to be significantly increased (from 120.8 +/- 56.6 to 149.5 +/- 57.6 IU/l, p = 0.008, and from 20.8 +/- 12.6 to 34.7 +/- 118.4 mu g/l, p = 0.015, respectively) while no significant change was observed in the resorptive marker of serum N-telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX). At the 6th and 12th month, BSAP and OCL were both found to be decreased below the pretreatment values. While a significant reduction was found in BSAP levels (from 120.8 +/- 56.6 to 55.9 +/- 18.8 IU/l, p < 0.001), no significant change was observed in CTX levels after the 6-month treatment period. Parathyroid hormone showed a gradual profound increase during the follow-up period (from 62.7 +/- 41.5 to 108.4 +/- 51.7 pg/ml, p < 0.001). No significant change was found in BMD levels at the spine, femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and trochanter at the end of the 1-year follow-up period. In conclusion, simvastatin treatment showed a short-lasting anabolic effect on bone metabolism. However, this effect was lost by prolongation of therapy. The decrease in both anabolic and resorptive markers at the 6th and 12th month suggests that simvastatin affects bone metabolism mostly in favor of inhibition of the bone turnover in a long-term observation period although this inhibitory effect was not reflected in BMD
    corecore