Characterization of summer savory (Satureja hortensis L.) honey by physico-chemical parameters and chromatographic/spectroscopic techniques (GC-FID/MS, HPLC-DAD, UV/VIS and FTIR-ATR

Satureja hortensis L. unifloral honey was characterized by pollen analysis, electrical conductivity, pH and extensively by chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques. UV / VIS spectro-scopy measurements revealed total phenol content of 682.1 mg GAE / kg by Folin-Ciocalteu assay, antiox-idant capacity by DPPH assay of 1.7 mmol TEAC / kg and by FRAP assay of 4.3 mmol Fe2+ / kg as well as CIE L*a*b*Cab*h°ab chromaticity coordinates. GC-MS after headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) revealed hotrienol (22.8 %) along with other linalool derivatives, benzaldehyde (6.1 %), phenylacetaldehyde (4.9 %) and few norisoprenoids (safranal (7.6 %) as the major). Ultrasonic solvent ex-traction (USE) followed by GC-MS allowed identification of methyl syringate (54.7 %) as predominant compound along with other benzene derivatives. HPLC-DAD analysis determined tyrosine (382.0 mg kg−1), phenylalanine (140.4 mg kg−1) and methyl syringate (39.32 mg kg−1). Methyl syringate and hotrienol can be considered non-specific chemical markers of S. hortensis honey. FTIR-ATR spectral characteristics of S. hortensis honey in fingerprinting region were not significantly different from other honey types, but the integrated intensity of the region was smaller than in other unifloral honeys

Baby corn, green corn, and dry corn yield of corn cultivars

In corn, when the first female inflorescence is removed, the plant often produces new female inflorescences. This allows the first ear to be harvested as baby corn (BC) and the second as green corn (GC) or dry corn (DC), that is, mature corn. The flexibility provided by a variety of harvested products allows the grower to compete with better conditions in the markets. We evaluated BC, GC, and DC yields in corn cultivars AG 1051, AG 2060, and BRS 2020, after the first ear was harvested as BC. A random block design with ten replicates was utilized. The yields of MM, MV and MS were higher when these products were individually harvested than when they were harvested in combination with baby corn (BC + GC and BC + DC). Cultivar BRS 2020 was the best for producing BC exclusively, considering the number and weight of marketable unhusked ears and the number (NH) of marketable husked ears. Considering weight (WH) of BC marketable husked ears, cultivar AG 1051 was the best. Cultivars did not differ in baby corn yield when this product was harvested in combination with MS or MV, except with regard to NH and WH, with AG 1051 being superior. The cultivars did not differ between total number of ears and number of marketable unhusked green ears. However, cultivars AG 1051 and AG 2060 were the best with respect to marketable unhusked green ears and number and weight of marketable husked green ears. Cultivar AG 1051 was the best with regard to kernel yield

Nutrient use and nutrient use efficiency of crops in a high CO2 atmosphere

Tausz, M ORCiD: 0000-0001-8205-8561Abstract Atmospheric CO2 concentrations [CO2] are continually increasing and are predicted to reach ~550 μmol mol-1 by 2050, about a 40 % increase from 2013 levels. Such a large increase in one of the key resources for plant growth will have significant effects on all plants, as carbon assimilation and, consequently, growth and yield is stimulated by the so-called ‘CO2 fertilisation effect’. The one sided increase in carbohydrate acquisition leads to changes in the chemical composition of plants: despite decreases in nutrient concentrations in plant tissues, the greater biomass developed by crops under elevated [CO2] could lead to increased nutrient demand. Nutrient use efficiency in terms of yield divided by available nutrient may improve, but grains or vegetative plant parts have decreased protein and mineral nutrient concentrations, which can diminish market and nutritious value. A number of hypotheses have been proposed to explain the decreases in nutrient concentra- tions, among them: (1) Dilution by increased biomass, (2) decreased mass flow, (3) changes in root architecture and function, (4) decreased nitrate eduction, and (5) changes in nutrient allocation and remobilisation. In addition, elevated [CO2] is likely to change soil processes, including nutrient supply. The extent to which some or all of these contribute to changes in crop nutrition and yield quality is currently unknown because most have not been sufficiently tested under relevant field conditions. This chapter gives an overview of the changes in plant nutrition and trade-offs under elevated [CO2] to point out that current and future efforts towards improved plant nutrient efficiency should explicitly take into consideration rising [CO2]. In particular, field testing of putative nutrient use efficiency traits and nutrient management strategies should include elevated [CO2] as a relevant factor in suitable exposure systems such as Free Air CO2 Enrichment (FACE) technology