Real World Experience of Disease Activity in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Response to Treatment With Varios Biologic DMARDs

The current study investigate the disease activity and effectiveness of treatment in patients with RA on biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in combination with a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) and determine whether or not the benefits of different therapies were sustained over a follow up period of 1 year. 124 patients were selected with a mean age 55.26 ± 13, 18SD years, meeting the 1987 ACR and /or ACR/ EULAR (2010) classification criteria for Rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients were arranged according to treatment regimens: Tocilizumab (TCL) – 30 patients, Certolizumab (CZP) – 16, Golimumab (GOL) – 22, Etanercept (ETN) 20, Adalimumab (ADA) 20, Rituximab (RTX) – 16. Disease activities was the primary concern. Independent joint assessor evaluated 28 joints on baseline, 6th and 12th month’s thereafter. C-reactive protein (CRP) was used to measure the inflammatory process. DAS28-CRP, clinical disease activity index (CDAI) and simplified disease activity index (SDAI) were calculated. On baseline all of the patients’ groups had severe disease activity (mean DAS28-CRP > 5.2, mean CDAI > 22, mean SDAI > 26. It was noted that, during the 6th month follow-up period all of the treatment groups significantly decreased DAS28-CRP, CDAI, SDAI and reach moderate disease activity. After 6th and 12th months of treatment all of the groups on bDMARDs had significantly lower disease activity. The GOL group reach remission only according to DAS28-CRP: 2.49 ± 0.76, and low disease activity as measured by CDAI: 6.78 ± 4.51 and SDAI 7.80 ± 5.67. The other 5 groups after 12 months reach the level of low disease activity according to the three activity parameters: DAS28-CRP (TCL 3.07 ± 0.73, CZP 3.06 ± 0.65, ETN 2.85 ± 0.55, ADA 3.15 ± 0.82, RTX 2.90 ± 0.70), CDAI (TCL 9.80 ± 4.91, CZP – 9.33 ± 4.22, ETN 7.97 ± 3.80, ADA 10.00 ± 5.25, RTX 7.48 ± 2.99) and SDAI (TCL 10.45 ± 5.14, CZP 9.94 ± 4.43, ETN 9.03 ± 4.25, ADA 10.50 ± 5.61, RTX 8.08 ± 3.24). The therapy with different bDMARDs added to a csDMARD led to very similar results – a minimal disease activity and a state of remission in the GOL treatment group only as per DAS28-CRP

2022 update

Funding Information: This study was funded by European League Against Rheumatism. Publisher Copyright: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.Objectives: To provide an update of the EULAR rheumatoid arthritis (RA) management recommendations addressing the most recent developments in the field. Methods: An international task force was formed and solicited three systematic literature research activities on safety and efficacy of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and glucocorticoids (GCs). The new evidence was discussed in light of the last update from 2019. A predefined voting process was applied to each overarching principle and recommendation. Levels of evidence and strengths of recommendation were assigned to and participants finally voted on the level of agreement with each item. Results: The task force agreed on 5 overarching principles and 11 recommendations concerning use of conventional synthetic (cs) DMARDs (methotrexate (MTX), leflunomide, sulfasalazine); GCs; biological (b) DMARDs (tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, etanercept, golimumab, infliximab including biosimilars), abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, sarilumab and targeted synthetic (ts) DMARDs, namely the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib. Guidance on monotherapy, combination therapy, treatment strategies (treat-to-target) and tapering in sustained clinical remission is provided. Safety aspects, including risk of major cardiovascular events (MACEs) and malignancies, costs and sequencing of b/tsDMARDs were all considered. Initially, MTX plus GCs is recommended and on insufficient response to this therapy within 3-6 months, treatment should be based on stratification according to risk factors; With poor prognostic factors (presence of autoantibodies, high disease activity, early erosions or failure of two csDMARDs), any bDMARD should be added to the csDMARD; after careful consideration of risks of MACEs, malignancies and/or thromboembolic events tsDMARDs may also be considered in this phase. If the first bDMARD (or tsDMARD) fails, any other bDMARD (from another or the same class) or tsDMARD (considering risks) is recommended. With sustained remission, DMARDs may be tapered but should not be stopped. Levels of evidence and levels of agreement were high for most recommendations. Conclusions: These updated EULAR recommendations provide consensus on RA management including safety, effectiveness and cost.publishersversionepub_ahead_of_prin

Assessment of Crystals in the Synovial Fluid of Psoriatic Arthritis Patients in Relation to Disease Activity

Background: This study examines the relationship between the presence of crystals in the synovial fluid of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and disease activity. Methods: The synovial fluid of 156 PsA patients was analyzed and compared to 50 patients with gonarthrosis (GoA). The Leica DM4500P polarization microscope was used for crystal detection. Results: The presence of crystals was observed in 23.71% of PsA patients and none of the GoA patients, p < 0.001. Monosodium urate crystals (67.58%) and calcium pyrophosphate crystals (21.62%) were prevalent. The presence of crystals in the synovial fluid of PsA patients was associated with high disease activity according to the Composite Psoriatic Disease Activity Index (OR = 18.75, 95%; CI: 7.13 to 49.25) and the Disease Activity for Psoriatic Arthritis (OR = 15.96, 95%; CI: 5.76 to 44.23), with severe disability according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (OR = 13.60, 95%; CI: 5.09 to 36.31), and with severe pain on the Visual Analog Scale (OR = 157.25, 95%; CI: 39.50 to 625.94). Conclusion: Our results suggest that synovial fluid examination should be included in the treatment pathway for PsA patients with active disease, to aid in determining whether urate-lowering therapy is required

Quality of Life and Cost Study of Rheumatoid Arthritis Therapy With Biological Medicines

Biological medicines are considered as a cornerstone in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). They change the course of the disease and improve the quality of life of patients. To this date there has been no study comparing the quality of life of and cost of RA therapy in Bulgaria. This fact is what provoked our interest toward this research. The aim of this study is to analyse the cost and quality of life of patients with RA threated with biological medicines in Bulgaria. This is an observational, real life study of 124 patients treated with biological medicines during 2012–2016 at the University hospital “St. Ivan Riskli” in Sofia, specialized in rheumatology disease therapy. Patients were recruited after their consecutive transfer from non-biological to biological medicines. The yearly pharmacotherapy cost was calculated with tocilizumab (n = 30), cetrolizmab (n = 16), golimumab (n = 22), etanercept (n = 20), adalimumab (n = 20), rituximab (n = 16). Three measurements of the quality of life (QoL) were performed with EQ5D—at the beginning of the therapy, after 6 months and after 1 year of therapy. Both section of EQ5D were used—VAS and EQ5D questionnaire. Cost—effectiveness was calculated for unit of improvement in EQ5D score for a one year period and decision model was built with TreeAgePro software. The observed cost of therapy varied between 12 thousand Euros for tocilizumab to 6 thousand Euros for rituximab. All biological medicines let to substantial increase in the quality of life of the patients. Patients on tocilizumab increased their QoL from 0.43 to 0.63 after 1 year; on cetrolizumab from 0.32 to 0.56; on golimumab from 0.41 to 0.67; on etanercept from 0.45 to 0.62; on adalimumab from 0.43 to 0.57; on rhituximab from 0.46 to 0.66. The cost-effectiveness estimates of different biological therapies also varied between 66 to 30 thousand Euros for unit of improvement in the EQ5D during one the course of the year. Therapy with biological medicines improves statistically significant the quality of life of patients, measured through VAS and EQ5D scales. Despite the improvement in the quality of life all biological medicines appears not to be note cost-effective due to their high incremental cost-effectiveness ration (ICER). Rituximab's incremental ratio has (ICER) falls closer to the three times gross domestic product per capita threshold and should be considered as preferred alternatives for RA therapy. In general we can conclude that the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis with biologicals improves quality of life significantly. Only rituximab was cost-effective

The role of gut microbiota in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common rheumatic disease in childhood, with prevalence of 16–150 cases per 100,000 children. The etiopathogenesis of JIA is a challenge incorporating a complex network with only 18% attributed to genetic factors. The remaining part should therefore be explained by non-hereditary factors. Given that around 70% of the immune cells are located in the gut, the potential role of the gut microbiota in the etiopathogenesis of JIA has been recently investigated. The aim of this review is to discuss the complexity of the link between gut microbiota and JIA, the different methods for identifying bacteria, the shape-up of the microbiota from birth to adulthood. The objectives are to discuss various pathways involved in this process: changes in the microbiota contents in healthy individuals and JIA patients, increased gut permeability, influence on T-cell differentiation and proliferation. Factors that have been associated with dysbiosis: diet, pathogens and drug use, are discussed. JIA is not a benign disease, it is a chronic disease and an important cause of short- and long-term disability-significant joint contractures, leg-length inequalities and uveitis, which can lead to impaired vision. It is known that at least one-third of children will have ongoing active disease into their adult years, and many will have some limitation in their daily life activities. A deeper understanding of the pathways by which disturbances in the microbiome may evolve to disease may open doors to the development of new treatment or prevention strategies in the future

Cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biologic treatment in rheumatic diseases: a narrative review

AbstractThis narrative review provides a brief horizon scanning on the available literature on cost-effectiveness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in rheumatology for biological medicines. The PubMed database was used to search for articles containing the key words ‘cost-effectiveness’ AND ‘therapeutic drug monitoring’ AND ‘rheumatology’ or ‘rheumatoid’ with no limits on year of publication. CHEERS pharmacoeconomic criteria were applied to review the robustness of the studies. Out of 42 initial hits, only 4 full-text articles and 2 abstracts matched the specified search criteria fully. They conclude that proactive TDM was more cost-effective for patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases undergoing maintenance therapy with infliximab. For rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, the adalimumab dose tapering based on TDM led to an increased quality of life and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain and entailed lower costs. Patient-initiated service on the basis of TDM resulted in reductions in primary and secondary healthcare services, and hence, lower costs than the usual care. The use of a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor instead of a biologic disease modifying drug (DMARD) in a treat-to-target approach is cost-effective in conventional synthetic DMARD refractory RA patients; monitoring of patients with chronic inflammatory diseases and low disease activity or in remission undergoing biological therapy can be achieved with less resources. The findings in our mini-review suggest that TDM might result in cost-saving. Given the benefit other patients may gain from the resources saved, we encourage further clinical and cost-effectiveness studies

Cost of arthropathic diseases therapy with biologicals disease modifying drugs (bDMARs): a 5-year cost analysis at national level

AbstractThis study analysed the changes in the reimbursed cost, prices and utilization of biological medicines for a 5-year time horizon, encompassing three major arthropathic diagnoses, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthropathies (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), from the point of view of the third-party payer in Bulgaria. National; population based; macroeconomic; top-down budget analysis was performed based on official data about the number of inhabitants, reimbursed diagnoses and medicines, reimbursed cost, treated patients, and prices of medicines. The utilization of medicines was calculated in DDD per 1000/inh/day. There was an increase of 41% in the number of patients treated with biological medicines. The reimbursement cost of biologicals increased by 21%; however, the per-patient reimbursement costs per diagnosis fell by 40% due to price decreases. Out of 21 reimbursed diagnoses, we saw a significant difference in prevalence (612 SD in 2016 to 1216 SD in 2020; p < 0.05). RA accounted for 2736 patients in 2016, increasing by 131% to 4662 patients in 2020; AS with 1933 patients in 2016 reached 3196 patients by 2020, and PsA with 1128 patients ranked third with a 75% increase. The cost of therapy of RA was the highest, accounting for appr. 15 mill Euro in 2016. The utilization decreased only for 2 INNs (infliximab and rituximab). All INNs experienced a nearly two-fold increase in their utilization: from 0.5244 to 0.9252 DDD/1000inh/day. The cost analysis shows an important place of biologicals for arthropathic diseases therapy; introduction of biosimilars leads to prices and cost decreases