FACTORS INFLUENCING POST-SOVIET RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY IN THE NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

The protracted Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan has existed in the South Caucasus since the Soviet era. Throughout this decades-long war, more than 20,000 deaths have occurred and 1.5 million persons have been displaced. The Russian Federation remains a perennial mediator of the conflict as it seeks to further its special relationships with Armenia and Azerbaijan, consistent with its objectives in its entire near abroad. To that end, Russia continues to exercise its foreign policy in this deadlocked but intense territorial dispute over the mountainous region between Armenia and Azerbaijan. Russia’s participation in multinational organizations, unilateral peace-brokering efforts, and bilateral relationships ensure that it maintains its hegemony in the region while also impeding international peace efforts. During the 2020 flareup known as the Second Karabakh War, Russia retained its role as the primary negotiator by unilaterally brokering a ceasefire and deploying nearly 2,000 Russian Federation peacekeepers to Nagorno-Karabakh. However, complicating matters further is Azerbaijan’s continual movement toward Turkey, Armenia’s geopolitical isolation, and Turkey’s increased, competitive role in the region. Factors in Russia’s historical intervention, Armenian and Azerbaijani perceptions of Russia’s intentions, and Turkey’s increased role in the region continue to complicate and reinforce Russian foreign policy initiatives in the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.Outstanding ThesisLieutenant, United States NavyApproved for public release. Distribution is unlimited

Herschel observations of EXtraordinary Sources: Analysis of the full Herschel/HIFI molecular line survey of Sagittarius B2(N)

A sensitive broadband molecular line survey of the Sagittarius B2(N) star-forming region has been obtained with the HIFI instrument on the Herschel Space Observatory, offering the first high-spectral resolution look at this well-studied source in a wavelength region largely inaccessible from the ground (625-157 um). From the roughly 8,000 spectral features in the survey, a total of 72 isotopologues arising from 44 different molecules have been identified, ranging from light hydrides to complex organics, and arising from a variety of environments from cold and diffuse to hot and dense gas. We present an LTE model to the spectral signatures of each molecule, constraining the source sizes for hot core species with complementary SMA interferometric observations, and assuming that molecules with related functional group composition are cospatial. For each molecule, a single model is given to fit all of the emission and absorption features of that species across the entire 480-1910 GHz spectral range, accounting for multiple temperature and velocity components when needed to describe the spectrum. As with other HIFI surveys toward massive star forming regions, methanol is found to contribute more integrated line intensity to the spectrum than any other species. We discuss the molecular abundances derived for the hot core, where the local thermodynamic equilibrium approximation is generally found to describe the spectrum well, in comparison to abundances derived for the same molecules in the Orion KL region from a similar HIFI survey.Comment: Accepted to ApJ. 64 pages, 14 figures. Truncated abstrac

Molecular Strategies for Gene Containment in Transgenic Crops

The potential of genetically modified (GM) crops to transfer foreign genes through pollen to related plant species has been cited as an environmental concern. Until more is known concerning the environmental impact of novel genes on indigenous crops and weeds, practical and regulatory considerations will likely require the adoption of gene-containment approaches for future generations of GM crops. Most molecular approaches with potential for controlling gene flow among crops and weeds have thus far focused on maternal inheritance, male sterility, and seed sterility. Several other containment strategies may also prove useful in restricting gene flow, including apomixis (vegetative propagation and asexual seed formation), cleistogamy (self-fertilization without opening of the flower), genome incompatibility, chemical induction/deletion of transgenes, fruit-specific excision of transgenes, and transgenic mitigation (transgenes that compromise fitness in the hybrid). As yet, however, no strategy has proved broadly applicable to all crop species, and a combination of approaches may prove most effective for engineering the next generation of GM crops

Sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) degradation by nitrate-reducing bacteria

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00253-017-8212-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.The surfactant sodium lauryl ether sulfate (SLES) is widely used in the composition of detergents and frequently ends up in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). While aerobic SLES degradation is well studied, little is known about the fate of this compound in anoxic environments, such as denitrification tanks of WWTPs, nor about the bacteria involved in the anoxic biodegradation. Here, we used SLES as sole carbon and energy source, at concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 mg L1, to enrich and isolate nitrate-reducing bacteria from activated sludge of a WWTP with the anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (A2/O) concept. In the 50 mg L1 enrichment, Comamonas (50%), Pseudomonas (24%), and Alicycliphilus (12%) were present at higher relative abundance, while Pseudomonas (53%) became dominant in the 1000 mg L1 enrichment. Aeromonas hydrophila strain S7, Pseudomonas stutzeri strain S8, and Pseudomonas nitroreducens strain S11 were isolated from the enriched cultures. Under denitrifying conditions, strains S8 and S11 degraded 500 mg L1 SLES in less than 1 day, while strain S7 required more than 6 days. Strains S8 and S11 also showed a remarkable resistance to SLES, being able to grow and reduce nitrate with SLES concentrations up to 40 g L1. Strain S11 turned out to be the best anoxic SLES degrader, degrading up to 41% of 500 mg L1. The comparison between SLES anoxic and oxic degradation by strain S11 revealed differences in SLES cleavage, degradation, and sulfate accumulation; both ester and ether cleavage were probably employed in SLES anoxic degradation by strain S11.This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (contract project CTQ2007-64324 and 447 CONSOLIDER-CSD 2007-00055). The Regional Government of Castilla y Leon (Ref. GR76) is also gratefully acknowledged. MRD is supported by the WIMEK graduate school (project BAdaptive capacity and functionality of multi-trophic aquatic ecosystems^). AJMS is supported by the Gravitation grant (project 024.002.002) of the Netherlands Ministry of Education, Culture and Science and the Netherlands Science Foundation (NWO). AJMS and AJC are supported by an European ResearchCouncil (ERC) Grant (Project 323009).Thisstudywassupported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2013 unit and COMPETE 2020 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684) and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020 - Programa Operacional Regional do Norte. This study was alsosupportedbythePortugueseFoundationforScienceandTechnology (FCT) under the scope of the Project RECI/BBB-EBI/0179/2012 (FCOMP-01-0124-FEDER-027462). Joana Alves from University of Minho (Portugal) is acknowledged for support with the molecular techniques.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

The pairwise disconnectivity index as a new metric for the topological analysis of regulatory networks

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Currently, there is a gap between purely theoretical studies of the topology of large bioregulatory networks and the practical traditions and interests of experimentalists. While the theoretical approaches emphasize the global characterization of regulatory systems, the practical approaches focus on the role of distinct molecules and genes in regulation. To bridge the gap between these opposite approaches, one needs to combine 'general' with 'particular' properties and translate abstract topological features of large systems into testable functional characteristics of individual components. Here, we propose a new topological parameter – the pairwise disconnectivity index of a network's element – that is capable of such bridging.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The pairwise disconnectivity index quantifies how crucial an individual element is for sustaining the communication ability between connected pairs of vertices in a network that is displayed as a directed graph. Such an element might be a vertex (i.e., molecules, genes), an edge (i.e., reactions, interactions), as well as a group of vertices and/or edges. The index can be viewed as a measure of topological redundancy of regulatory paths which connect different parts of a given network and as a measure of sensitivity (robustness) of this network to the presence (absence) of each individual element. Accordingly, we introduce the notion of a path-degree of a vertex in terms of its corresponding incoming, outgoing and mediated paths, respectively. The pairwise disconnectivity index has been applied to the analysis of several regulatory networks from various organisms. The importance of an individual vertex or edge for the coherence of the network is determined by the particular position of the given element in the whole network.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Our approach enables to evaluate the effect of removing each element (i.e., vertex, edge, or their combinations) from a network. The greatest potential value of this approach is its ability to systematically analyze the role of every element, as well as groups of elements, in a regulatory network.</p

Genetic Analyses of Interactions among Gibberellin, Abscisic Acid, and Brassinosteroids in the Control of Flowering Time in Arabidopsis thaliana

Genetic interactions between phytohormones in the control of flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana have not been extensively studied. Three phytohormones have been individually connected to the floral-timing program. The inductive function of gibberellins (GAs) is the most documented. Abscisic acid (ABA) has been demonstrated to delay flowering. Finally, the promotive role of brassinosteroids (BRs) has been established. It has been reported that for many physiological processes, hormone pathways interact to ensure an appropriate biological response.We tested possible genetic interactions between GA-, ABA-, and BR-dependent pathways in the control of the transition to flowering. For this, single and double mutants deficient in the biosynthesis of GAs, ABA, and BRs were used to assess the effect of hormone deficiency on the timing of floral transition. Also, plants that over-express genes encoding rate-limiting enzymes in each biosynthetic pathway were generated and the flowering time of these lines was investigated.Loss-of-function studies revealed a complex relationship between GAs and ABA, and between ABA and BRs, and suggested a cross-regulatory relation between GAs to BRs. Gain-of-function studies revealed that GAs were clearly limiting in their sufficiency of action, whereas increases in BRs and ABA led to a more modest phenotypic effect on floral timing. We conclude from our genetic tests that the effects of GA, ABA, and BR on timing of floral induction are only in partially coordinated action

Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis

[EN] Plant development is modulated by the convergence of multiple environmental and endogenous signals, and the mechanisms that allow the integration of different signaling pathways is currently being unveiled. A paradigmatic case is the concurrence of brassinosteroid (BR) and gibberellin (GA) signaling in the control of cell expansion during photomorphogenesis, which is supported by physiological observations in several plants but for which no molecular mechanism has been proposed. In this work, we show that the integration of these two signaling pathways occurs through the physical interaction between the DELLA protein GAI, which is a major negative regulator of the GA pathway, and BRASSINAZOLE RESISTANT1 (BZR1), a transcription factor that broadly regulates gene expression in response to BRs. We provide biochemical evidence, both in vitro and in vivo, indicating that GAI inactivates the transcriptional regulatory activity of BZR1 upon their interaction by inhibiting the ability of BZR1 to bind to target promoters. The physiological relevance of this interaction was confirmed by the observation that the dominant gai-1 allele interferes with BR-regulated gene expression, whereas the bzr1-1D allele displays enhanced resistance to DELLA accumulation during hypocotyl elongation. Because DELLA proteins mediate the response to multiple environmental signals, our results provide an initial molecular framework for the integration with BRs of additional pathways that control plant development.We thank the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, Tai-ping Sun, Zhi-Yong Wang, Yanhai Yin, Ana Cano-Delgado, Luis Lopez-Molina, and Francois Parcy for providing seeds or reagents; Laura Garcia-Carcel and Gaston Pizzio for help in the early stages of this work; and Salome Prat for fruitful discussions, sharing unpublished results, and careful reading of the manuscript. J.G.-B. holds a Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas Fellowship of the Joint Admissions Exercise Predoctoral Program. E. G. M. is recipient of a postdoctoral "Juan de la Cierva" contract from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation. A. L. was supported in part by a fellowship of the Fondo per gli Investimenti della Ricerca di Base Progetto Giovani of the Italian Ministry of Education, University, and Research. Work in the authors' laboratory was funded by Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation Grants BIO2007-60923, BIO2010-15071, and CSD2007-00057 and by Generalitat Valenciana Grants ACOMP/2010/190 and PROMETEO/2010/020. Rothamsted Research is funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) of the United Kingdom.Gallego Bartolomé, J.; Minguet, EG.; Grau Enguix, F.; Abbas, M.; Locascio, AAM.; Thomas, SG.; Alabadí Diego, D.... (2012). Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(33):13446-13451. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1119992109S134461345110933Depuydt, S., & Hardtke, C. S. (2011). Hormone Signalling Crosstalk in Plant Growth Regulation. Current Biology, 21(9), R365-R373. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.013Alabadi, D., Blazquez, M. A., Carbonell, J., Ferrandiz, C., & Perez-Amador, M. A. (2009). Instructive roles for hormones in plant development. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, 53(8-9-10), 1597-1608. doi:10.1387/ijdb.072423daHartwell, L. H., Hopfield, J. J., Leibler, S., & Murray, A. W. (1999). From molecular to modular cell biology. Nature, 402(S6761), C47-C52. doi:10.1038/35011540Kuppusamy, K. T., Walcher, C. L., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2008). Cross-regulatory mechanisms in hormone signaling. Plant Molecular Biology, 69(4), 375-381. doi:10.1007/s11103-008-9389-2Jaillais, Y., & Chory, J. (2010). Unraveling the paradoxes of plant hormone signaling integration. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 17(6), 642-645. doi:10.1038/nsmb0610-642Sun, T. (2011). The Molecular Mechanism and Evolution of the GA–GID1–DELLA Signaling Module in Plants. Current Biology, 21(9), R338-R345. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.036Hou, X., Lee, L. Y. C., Xia, K., Yan, Y., & Yu, H. (2010). DELLAs Modulate Jasmonate Signaling via Competitive Binding to JAZs. Developmental Cell, 19(6), 884-894. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.024Fonseca, S., Chico, J. M., & Solano, R. (2009). The jasmonate pathway: the ligand, the receptor and the core signalling module. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 12(5), 539-547. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2009.07.013Frigerio, M., Alabadí, D., Pérez-Gómez, J., García-Cárcel, L., Phillips, A. L., Hedden, P., & Blázquez, M. A. (2006). Transcriptional Regulation of Gibberellin Metabolism Genes by Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 142(2), 553-563. doi:10.1104/pp.106.084871Vert, G., Walcher, C. L., Chory, J., & Nemhauser, J. L. (2008). Integration of auxin and brassinosteroid pathways by Auxin Response Factor 2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), 9829-9834. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803996105Nemhauser, J. L., Mockler, T. C., & Chory, J. (2004). Interdependency of Brassinosteroid and Auxin Signaling in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biology, 2(9), e258. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020258Clouse, S. D. (2011). Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction: From Receptor Kinase Activation to Transcriptional Networks Regulating Plant Development. The Plant Cell, 23(4), 1219-1230. doi:10.1105/tpc.111.084475Tanaka, K., Nakamura, Y., Asami, T., Yoshida, S., Matsuo, T., & Okamoto, S. (2003). Physiological Roles of Brassinosteroids in Early Growth of Arabidopsis: Brassinosteroids Have a Synergistic Relationship with Gibberellin as well as Auxin in Light-Grown Hypocotyl Elongation. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 22(3), 259-271. doi:10.1007/s00344-003-0119-3Alabadí, D., Gil, J., Blázquez, M. A., & García-Martínez, J. L. (2004). Gibberellins Repress Photomorphogenesis in Darkness. Plant Physiology, 134(3), 1050-1057. doi:10.1104/pp.103.035451Li, J., Nagpal, P., Vitart, V., McMorris, T. C., & Chory, J. (1996). A Role for Brassinosteroids in Light-Dependent Development of Arabidopsis. Science, 272(5260), 398-401. doi:10.1126/science.272.5260.398Szekeres, M., Németh, K., Koncz-Kálmán, Z., Mathur, J., Kauschmann, A., Altmann, T., … Koncz, C. (1996). Brassinosteroids Rescue the Deficiency of CYP90, a Cytochrome P450, Controlling Cell Elongation and De-etiolation in Arabidopsis. Cell, 85(2), 171-182. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81094-6Chory, J., Nagpal, P., & Peto, C. A. (1991). Phenotypic and Genetic Analysis of det2, a New Mutant That Affects Light-Regulated Seedling Development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 445-459. doi:10.1105/tpc.3.5.445Cheadle, C., Vawter, M. P., Freed, W. J., & Becker, K. G. (2003). Analysis of Microarray Data Using Z Score Transformation. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 5(2), 73-81. doi:10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60455-2Koornneef, M., & van der Veen, J. H. (1980). Induction and analysis of gibberellin sensitive mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) heynh. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 58(6), 257-263. doi:10.1007/bf00265176Davière, J.-M., de Lucas, M., & Prat, S. (2008). Transcriptional factor interaction: a central step in DELLA function. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development, 18(4), 295-303. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2008.05.004Leivar, P., Tepperman, J. M., Monte, E., Calderon, R. H., Liu, T. L., & Quail, P. H. (2009). Definition of Early Transcriptional Circuitry Involved in Light-Induced Reversal of PIF-Imposed Repression of Photomorphogenesis in Young Arabidopsis Seedlings. The Plant Cell, 21(11), 3535-3553. doi:10.1105/tpc.109.070672Shin, J., Kim, K., Kang, H., Zulfugarov, I. S., Bae, G., Lee, C.-H., … Choi, G. (2009). Phytochromes promote seedling light responses by inhibiting four negatively-acting phytochrome-interacting factors. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(18), 7660-7665. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812219106Silverstone, A. L. (2001). Repressing a Repressor: Gibberellin-Induced Rapid Reduction of the RGA Protein in Arabidopsis. THE PLANT CELL ONLINE, 13(7), 1555-1566. doi:10.1105/tpc.13.7.1555Dill, A., Jung, H.-S., & Sun, T. -p. (2001). The DELLA motif is essential for gibberellin-induced degradation of RGA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24), 14162-14167. doi:10.1073/pnas.251534098Alabadí, D., Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Orlando, L., García-Cárcel, L., Rubio, V., Martínez, C., … Blázquez, M. A. (2007). Gibberellins modulate light signaling pathways to prevent Arabidopsis seedling de-etiolation in darkness. The Plant Journal, 53(2), 324-335. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03346.xYin, Y., Wang, Z.-Y., Mora-Garcia, S., Li, J., Yoshida, S., Asami, T., & Chory, J. (2002). BES1 Accumulates in the Nucleus in Response to Brassinosteroids to Regulate Gene Expression and Promote Stem Elongation. Cell, 109(2), 181-191. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00721-3He, J.-X., Gendron, J. M., Yang, Y., Li, J., & Wang, Z.-Y. (2002). The GSK3-like kinase BIN2 phosphorylates and destabilizes BZR1, a positive regulator of the brassinosteroid signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(15), 10185-10190. doi:10.1073/pnas.152342599Wang, Z.-Y., Nakano, T., Gendron, J., He, J., Chen, M., Vafeados, D., … Chory, J. (2002). Nuclear-Localized BZR1 Mediates Brassinosteroid-Induced Growth and Feedback Suppression of Brassinosteroid Biosynthesis. Developmental Cell, 2(4), 505-513. doi:10.1016/s1534-5807(02)00153-3Ryu, H., Kim, K., Cho, H., Park, J., Choe, S., & Hwang, I. (2007). Nucleocytoplasmic Shuttling of BZR1 Mediated by Phosphorylation Is Essential in Arabidopsis Brassinosteroid Signaling. The Plant Cell, 19(9), 2749-2762. doi:10.1105/tpc.107.053728Gampala, S. S., Kim, T.-W., He, J.-X., Tang, W., Deng, Z., Bai, M.-Y., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2007). An Essential Role for 14-3-3 Proteins in Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell, 13(2), 177-189. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2007.06.009De Lucas, M., Davière, J.-M., Rodríguez-Falcón, M., Pontin, M., Iglesias-Pedraz, J. M., Lorrain, S., … Prat, S. (2008). A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature, 451(7177), 480-484. doi:10.1038/nature06520Sun, T., & Gubler, F. (2004). MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF GIBBERELLIN SIGNALING IN PLANTS. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 55(1), 197-223. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141753He, J.-X. (2005). BZR1 Is a Transcriptional Repressor with Dual Roles in Brassinosteroid Homeostasis and Growth Responses. Science, 307(5715), 1634-1638. doi:10.1126/science.1107580Sun, Y., Fan, X.-Y., Cao, D.-M., Tang, W., He, K., Zhu, J.-Y., … Wang, Z.-Y. (2010). Integration of Brassinosteroid Signal Transduction with the Transcription Network for Plant Growth Regulation in Arabidopsis. Developmental Cell, 19(5), 765-777. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.010Triezenberg, S. J., Kingsbury, R. C., & McKnight, S. L. (1988). Functional dissection of VP16, the trans-activator of herpes simplex virus immediate early gene expression. Genes &amp; Development, 2(6), 718-729. doi:10.1101/gad.2.6.718Feng, S., Martinez, C., Gusmaroli, G., Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Wang, F., … Deng, X. W. (2008). Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature, 451(7177), 475-479. doi:10.1038/nature06448Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Arana, M. V., Vandenbussche, F., Žádníková, P., Minguet, E. G., Guardiola, V., … Blázquez, M. A. (2011). Hierarchy of hormone action controlling apical hook development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 67(4), 622-634. doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04621.xGallego-Bartolomé, J., Alabadí, D., & Blázquez, M. A. (2011). DELLA-Induced Early Transcriptional Changes during Etiolated Development in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE, 6(8), e23918. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023918Steber, C. M., & McCourt, P. (2001). A Role for Brassinosteroids in Germination in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 125(2), 763-769. doi:10.1104/pp.125.2.763Yin, Y., Vafeados, D., Tao, Y., Yoshida, S., Asami, T., & Chory, J. (2005). A New Class of Transcription Factors Mediates Brassinosteroid-Regulated Gene Expression in Arabidopsis. Cell, 120(2), 249-259. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.044Müller, B., & Sheen, J. (2008). Cytokinin and auxin interaction in root stem-cell specification during early embryogenesis. Nature, 453(7198), 1094-1097. doi:10.1038/nature0694