12 research outputs found

    A model to predict short-term death or readmission after intensive care unit discharge.

    Full text link
    OBJECTIVE: Early unplanned readmission to the intensive care unit (ICU) carries a poor prognosis, and post-ICU mortality may be related, in part, to premature ICU discharge. Our objectives were to identify independent risk factors for early post-ICU readmission or death and to construct a prediction model. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database was done. SETTING: Four ICUs of the French Outcomerea network participated. PATIENTS: Patients were consecutive adults with ICU stay longer than 24 hours who were discharged alive to same-hospital wards without treatment-limitation decisions. MAIN RESULTS: Of 5014 admitted patients, 3462 met our inclusion criteria. Age was 60.6 +/- 17.6 years, and admission Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) was 35.1 +/- 15.1. The rate of death or ICU readmission within 7 days after ICU discharge was 3.0%. Independent risk factors for this outcome were age, SAPS II at ICU admission, use of a central venous catheter in the ICU, Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome scores before ICU discharge, and discharge at night. The predictive model based on these variables showed good calibration. Compared with SAPS II at admission or Stability and Workload Index for Transfer at discharge, discrimination was better with our model (area under receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-0.79). CONCLUSION: Among patients without treatment-limitation decisions and discharged alive from the ICU, 3.0% died or were readmitted within 7 days. Independent risk factors were indicators of patients' severity and discharge at night. Our prediction model should be evaluated in other ICU populations

    Impact of adverse events on outcomes in intensive care unit patients.

    No full text
    International audienceOBJECTIVE: To examine the association between predefined adverse events (AE) (including nosocomial infections) and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, controlling for multiple adverse events in the same patient and confounding variables. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study of the French OUTCOMEREA multicenter database. SETTING: Twelve medical or surgical ICUs. PATIENTS: Unselected patients hospitalized for > or = 48 hrs enrolled between 1997 and 2003. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 3,611 patients included, 1415 (39.2%) experienced one or more AEs and 821 (22.7%) had two or more AEs. Mean number of AEs per patient was 2.8 (range, 1-26). Six AEs were associated with death: primary or catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI) (odds ratio [OR], 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-5.32), BSI from other sources (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.66-12.05), nonbacteremic pneumonia (OR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.17-2.44), deep and organ/space surgical site infection without BSI (OR, 3; 95% CI, 1.3-6.8), pneumothorax (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.5-6.3), and gastrointestinal bleeding (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.4-4.9). The results were not changed when the analysis was confined to patients with mechanical ventilation on day 1, intermediate severity of illness (Simplified Acute Physiology Score II between 35 and 55), no treatment-limitation decisions, or no cardiac arrest in the ICU. CONCLUSIONS: AEs were common and often occurred in combination in individual patients. Several AEs independently contributed to death. Creating a safe ICU environment is a challenging task that deserves careful attention from ICU physicians

    Treatment intensity and outcome of nonagenarians selected for admission in ICUs: a multicenter study of the Outcomerea Research Group

    Get PDF
    International audienceBACKGROUND: Outcome of very elderly patients admitted in intensive care unit (ICU) was most often reported for octogenarians. ICU admission demands for nonagenarians are increasing. The primary objective was to compare outcome and intensity of treatment of octogenarians and nonagenarians. METHODS: We performed an observational study in 12 ICUs of the Outcomerea network which prospectively upload data into the Outcomerea database. Patients \textgreater90 years old (case patients) were matched with patients 80-90 years old (control patients). Matching criteria were severity of illness at admission, center, and year of admission. RESULTS: A total of 2419 patients aged 80 or older and admitted from September 1997 to September 2013 were included. Among them, 179 (7.9 %) were \textgreater90 years old. Matching was performed for 176 nonagenarian patients. Compared with control patients, case patients were more often hospitalized for unscheduled surgery [54 (30.7 %) vs. 42 (23.9 %), p \textless 0.01] and had less often arterial monitoring for blood pressure [37 (21 %) vs. 53 (30.1 %), p = 0.04] and renal replacement therapy [5 (2.8 %) vs. 14 (8 %), p = 0.05] than control patients. ICU [44 (25 %) vs. 36 (20.5 %), p = 0.28] or hospital mortality [70 (39.8 %) vs. 64 (36.4 %), p = 0.46] and limitation of life-sustaining therapies were not significantly different in case versus control patients, respectively. Only 16/176 (14 %) of case patients were transferred to a geriatric unit. CONCLUSION: This multicenter study reported that nonagenarians represented a small fraction of ICU patients. When admitted, these highly selected patients received similar life-sustaining treatments, except RRT, than octogenarians. ICU and hospital mortality were similar between the two groups

    Selected medical errors in the intensive care unit: results of the IATROREF study: parts I and II

    No full text
    International audienceRATIONALE: Although intensive care units (ICUs) were created for patients with life-threatening illnesses, the ICU environment generates a high risk of iatrogenic events. Identifying medical errors (MEs) that serve as indicators for iatrogenic risk is crucial for purposes of reporting and prevention. OBJECTIVES: We describe the selection of indicator MEs, the incidence of such MEs, and their relationship with mortality. METHODS: We selected indicator MEs using Delphi techniques. An observational prospective multicenter cohort study of these MEs was conducted from March 27 to April 3, 2006, in 70 ICUs; 16 (23%) centers were audited. Harm from MEs was collected using specific scales. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen types of MEs were selected as indicators; 1,192 MEs were reported for 1,369 patients, and 367 (26.8%) patients experienced at least 1 ME (2.1/1,000 patient-days). The most common MEs were insulin administration errors (185.9/1,000 d of insulin treatment). Of the 1,192 medical errors, 183 (15.4%) in 128 (9.3%) patients were adverse events that were followed by one or more clinical consequences (n = 163) or that required one or more procedures or treatments (n = 58). By multivariable analysis, having two or more adverse events was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-7.36; P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of medical errors on mortality indicates an urgent need to develop prevention programs. We have planned a study to assess a program based on our results

    Impact of early nutrition and feeding route on outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with shock: a post hoc marginal structural model study

    No full text
    International audienceFew data are available about optimal nutrition modalities in mechanically ventilated patients with shock. Our objective was to assess associations linking early nutrition (72 h and shock (arterial systolic pressure <90 mmHg) within 48 h after intubation. A marginal structural Cox model was used to create a pseudo-population in which treatment was unconfounded by subject-specific characteristics.RESULTS:We included 3,032 patients. Early nutrition was associated with lower day-28 mortality [HR 0.89, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.98, P = 0.01] and day-7 mortality (HR 0.76, CI 0.66-0.87, P < 0.001) but not with lower day-7 to day-28 mortality (HR 1.00, CI 0.89-1.12, P = 0.98). Early nutrition increased VAP risk over the 28 days (HR 1.08, CI 1.00-1.17, P = 0.046) and until day 7 (HR 7.17, CI 6.27-8.19, P < 0.001) but decreased VAP risk from days 7 to 28 (HR 0.85, CI 0.78-0.92, P < 0.001). Compared to parenteral feeding, enteral feeding was associated with a slightly increased VAP risk (HR 1.11, CI 1.00-1.22, P = 0.04) but not with mortality. Neither mortality nor VAP risk differed between early calorie intakes of ≥20 and <20 kcal/kg/day.CONCLUSION:In mechanically ventilated patients with shock, early nutrition was associated with reduced mortality. Neither feeding route nor early calorie intake was associated with mortality. Early nutrition and enteral feeding were associated with increased VAP risk

    Excess risk of death from intensive care unit-acquired nosocomial bloodstream infections: a reappraisal.

    Full text link
    peer reviewedBACKGROUND: Overall rates of bloodstream infection (BSI) are often used as quality indicators in intensive care units (ICUs). We investigated whether ICU-acquired BSI increased mortality (by > or = 10%) after adjustment for severity of infection at ICU admission and during the pre-BSI stay. METHODS: We conducted a matched, risk-adjusted (1:n), exposed-unexposed study of patients with stays longer than 72 h in 12 ICUs randomly selected from the Outcomerea database. RESULTS: Patients with BSI after the third ICU day (exposed group) were matched on the basis of risk-exposure time and mortality predicted at admission using the Three-Day Recalibrated ICU Outcome (TRIO) score to patients without BSI (unexposed group). Severity was assessed daily using the Logistic Organ Dysfunction (LOD) score. Of 3247 patients with ICU stays of >3 days, 232 experienced BSI by day 30 (incidence, 6.8 cases per 100 admissions); among them, 226 patients were matched to 1023 unexposed patients. Crude hospital mortality was 61.5% among exposed and 36.7% among unexposed patients (P<.0001). Attributable mortality was 24.8%. The only variable associated with both BSI and hospital mortality was the LOD score determined 4 days before onset of BSI (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.16; P = .0025). The adjusted OR for hospital mortality among exposed patients (OR, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.30-4.43) decreased when the LOD score determined 4 days before onset of BSI was taken into account (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 2.17-4.22; P<.0001). The estimated risk of death from BSI varied considerably according to the source and resistance of organisms, time to onset, and appropriateness of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: When adjusted for risk-exposure time and severity at admission and during the ICU stay, BSI was associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality, but considerable variation occurred across BSI subgroups. Focusing on BSI subgroups may be valuable for assessing quality of care in ICUs
    corecore