Steroid treatment of acute graft-versus-host disease grade I: A randomized trial

Patients with acute graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) grade I were randomized to an observation arm (n=85) or to a treatment arm (n=86) consisting of 6-methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day, after stratification for age and donor type. The primary end point was development of grade II-IV GvHD. The cumulative incidence of grade II-IV GvHD was 50% in the observation arm and 33% in the treatment arm (P=0.005). However, grade III-IV GvHD was comparable (13% vs. 10%, respectively; P=0.6), and this was true for sibling and alternative donor transplants. Moderate/severe chronic GvHD was also comparable (17% vs. 9%). In multivariate analysis, an early interval between transplant and randomization

Changes in Stem Cell Transplant activity and procedures during SARS-CoV2 pandemic in Italy: an Italian Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO) nationwide analysis (TransCOVID-19 Survey)

The Transplant Centers belonging to Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO) conducted a survey with the aim of evaluating the effect of SARS-CoV2 pandemic on the allogeneic transplant activity in Italy. The pandemic period from 1/3/2020 to 31/7/2020 was compared with the same period in 2019. Overall, in 2020 there was a 2.4% reduction in the number of allo-HCT cases compared to 2019. Interestingly, this deflection did not affect the acute leukemia cases (+5.7% in 2020). The use of peripheral blood-derived stem cells (+10.7%) and cryopreservation (97.4% of the centers) was highly adopted in 2020. Despite the sanitary emergency, almost all of the surveyed centers declared no impact of SARS-CoV2 pandemic on the transplant timing and outcomes, and the sanitary policy was positively evaluated by the majority of centers. The emergency measures ensured that only a minority of the allo-HCT patients had been infected by SARS-CoV2; however, a mortality of 42.1% among the allo-HCT patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was recorded. This survey gives us the information that the GITMO Group reacted positively to the pandemic. Thanks to the emergency strategies, the Italian allo-HCT activity continued safely, showing only a minor deflection and offering the same probability of cure to the transplanted patients

Changes in Stem Cell Transplant activity and procedures during SARS-CoV2 pandemic in Italy: an Italian Bone Marrow Transplant Group (GITMO) nationwide analysis (TransCOVID-19 Survey)

The Transplant Centers belonging to Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO) conducted a survey with the aim of evaluating the effect of SARS-CoV2 pandemic on the allogeneic transplant activity in Italy. The pandemic period from 1/3/2020 to 31/7/2020 was compared with the same period in 2019. Overall, in 2020 there was a 2.4% reduction in the number of allo-HCT cases compared to 2019. Interestingly, this deflection did not affect the acute leukemia cases (+5.7% in 2020). The use of peripheral blood-derived stem cells (+10.7%) and cryopreservation (97.4% of the centers) was highly adopted in 2020. Despite the sanitary emergency, almost all of the surveyed centers declared no impact of SARS-CoV2 pandemic on the transplant timing and outcomes, and the sanitary policy was positively evaluated by the majority of centers. The emergency measures ensured that only a minority of the allo-HCT patients had been infected by SARS-CoV2; however, a mortality of 42.1% among the allo-HCT patients hospitalized for COVID-19 was recorded. This survey gives us the information that the GITMO Group reacted positively to the pandemic. Thanks to the emergency strategies, the Italian allo-HCT activity continued safely, showing only a minor deflection and offering the same probability of cure to the transplanted patients

Nilotinib For Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease (SR-cGVHD): Preliminary Results Of a Phase I-II GITMO Study (Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo)

Chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGvHD) is still the leading cause of late mortality in transplanted patients. Among the new drugs potentially useful in patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD (SR-cGVHD), the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Imatinib emerged as promising agent; however in our previous experiences, patient's frailty and their reduced haematological tolerance heavily limited the daily dose of Imatinib (median dose administered was 200 mg/day). Thus we planned to evaluate in the same setting a the safety and activity of a second generation TKI, such as Nilotinib (NIL), characterized by a better haematological tolerance and that could allow to treat SR-cGVHD patients with a higher relative dosage than Imatinib, thus achieving a better efficacy. Basing on this rational we designed a phase I-II study, aimed to individuate the maximum tolerated dose ( MTD) and the activity of NIL in patients with SR-cGVHD (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01810718). Primary endpoint of the phase I study was to define the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of NIL, defined as the occurrence of any grade≥3 toxicity during at least one month of treatment. According to the Fibonacci standard 3+3 design, we started from an initial dose of 200 mg/day of NIL, up to a maximum of 600 mg/day. The drug has been supplied free of charge by Novartis Italia, Milan. In the phase II the MTD will be used to define the efficacy of NIL in SR-cGVHD patients, with similar characteristics of the previously Imatinib-treated population. Moreover all the patients enrolled in the phase I were allowed to continue NIL at the same dose, up to a cGVHD progression, if an objective improvement (OI) was documented after 3 months of treatment. We report here the preliminary results of a pre-planned interim analysis, during the phase I study, in 12 patients with SR-cGVHD who received NIL at low dose. The main characteristics of the enrolled patients are reported in table 1. Six patients received NIL 200mg/day and 6 NIL 300 mg/day. Two patients stopped NIL within 30 days: one due to cGVHD progression, the other had asymptomatic hypertransaminasemia (&gt;5xULN) which normalized 1 month after stopping NIL; these patients received an alternative treatment. In 3 cases severe adverse events (SAE) have been reported: 1 patient had extramedullary relapse of Acute Leukemia 8 months after start of NIL, while 2 patients have been hospitalized; one due to a transient cGVHD flare, without drug interruption, the second for a late cGVHD progression; he eventually died. The most frequent extrahematological toxicities (grade 1-2 according to CTCAE) were headache, nausea, pruritus, cramps, asthenia, constipation, while the main hematological abnormalities were represented by anemia grade 1 (5/12patients), neutropenia gr.1 (1/12 patients) and lymphocyte count increase gr.2 (1/12 patients). (tab.2) With a median F-U of 10 months (range 4-20), 10 patients are alive, while two died for cGVHD progression (7 and 9 months after the enrollment). After 3 months of treatment with NIL 6 patients (50%) achieved an OI and 4 (33%) a stable disease; all the 10 patients continued Nilotinib at the same dose until ≥6 months of treatment: after 6 months we observed 5 OI, 1 stable disease and 2 mixed responses (2 lung responses with skin failure), while in 2 the response evaluation is still ongoing. These preliminary data suggest that, like Imatinib, NIL at low doses is safe and effective in SR-cGVHD patients; up to day the MTD has not been still achieved, therefore only after the end of the phase I study we will be able to fully define the NIL activity. This study is supported by GITMO (Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo). Disclosures: Off Label Use: Bendamustine. </jats:sec

Busulfan- or Thiotepa-Based Conditioning in Myelofibrosis: A Phase II Multicenter Randomized Study from the GITMO Group

We are reporting a randomized study comparing fludarabine in combination with busulfan (FB) or thiotepa (FT), as conditioning regimen for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with myelofibrosis. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients were enrolled with a median age of 56 years and an intermediate-2 or high-risk score in 65%, according to the Dynamic International Prognostic Staging System (DIPSS). Donors were HLA-identical sibling (n=25), matched unrelated (n=25) or single allele mismatched unrelated (n=10). With a median follow-up of 22 months (range 1-68), the following outcomes at 2 years after HSCT in the FB vs. the FT arm were as follows: PFS 43% vs 55%, (P=.28), overall survival (OS) 54% vs. 70% (P=.17), relapse/progression 36% vs 24% (P=.24), non-relapse mortality (NRM) 21% in both arms (P=.99) and graft failure 14% vs. 10% (P=.96). A better PFS was observed in patients with intermediate-1 DIPSS score (P=.03). Neutrophil and platelet engraftment was significantly influenced by prior splenectomy [HR 2.28 (95% CI, 1.16-4.51) P=.02] and splenomegaly at transplant [HR 0.51 (95% CI, 0.27-0.94) P=.03]. In conclusion, the clinical outcome after HSCT was comparable when using either a busulfan or thiotepa based conditioning regimen