Pain may be inevitable; inadequate management is not

Assessing and managing pain in the critically ill patient is challenging. Reproducible and clinically applicable pain measurement scales have yet to be validated and ubiquitously applied in the intensive care unit setting. Critical care clinicians, both physicians and nurses, should thoughtfully monitor their patient's pain level, periodically reassess their practice and critically evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological and nonpharmacological analgesic interventions

Broadening our perspectives on ICU delirium risk factors

ICU delirium is associated with poor patient outcome. Risk factor stratification is essential to the understanding, prevention and treatment of this disorder. Alcohol consumption, smoking and prior cognitive impairment appear strongly correlated with delirium risk. Several potentially modifiable associations deserve prospective study: these include administration of sedatives and opiates; multiple catheters; as well as minimizing physical restraints and enabling visitors

Interactions médicamenteuses et réactions adverses aux soins intensifs: le rôle des sédatifs et des analgésiants

Les patients admis aux soins intensifs (SI) souffrent de comorbidités qui affectent leur pronostic. Deux problèmes sont potentiellement associés aux sédatifs et compliquent le séjour de 35 à 50% des malades : le délirium, un état confusionnel aigu; et le coma ‘iatrogénique’, une altération de la conscience induite pharmacologiquement. L’importance de l’association entre clinique et médicaments a un intérêt pour prévenir ces syndromes cliniques morbides. Nous voulions étudier le délirium et le coma iatrogénique, les doses administrées de midazolam et de fentanyl, leurs niveaux plasmatiques, les variantes génétiques de métabolisme et de transport et les facteurs inflammatoires et ce, chez 100 patients admis aux soins intensifs. Nos données soulignent l’importance des interactions médicamenteuses dans l’incidence du coma iatrogénique, et réfutent l’association entre les benzodiazépines et le délirium. Ces résultats clarifient la pathophysiologie du délirium, corroborent le manque d’association délirium-benzodiazépines avec un marqueur biologique, c.-à-d. les niveaux sériques, et ouvrent le débat quant aux agents les plus utiles pour traiter l’anxiété et le délirium. Finalement, plusieurs caractéristiques pharmacocinétiques des benzodiazépines administrées aux soins intensifs publiées récemment complètent les données de notre étude quant à la sédation en soins critiques. Un chapitre sur l’importance de la pharmacogénomique en soins intensifs et un débat publié quant au pro et con de l'utilisation des benzodiazépines aux SI, sont soumis en complément de l’étude clinique décrite ci-haut effectuée dans le cadre de cette maîtrise.Critically ill patients suffer from co-morbid conditions that impact on their prognosis. Two problems complicate Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay in 35-50% of patients and are potentially associated with sedatives: delirium, an acute confusional state, and 'iatrogenic' coma, when consciousness is altered pharmacologically. Establishing the association between these clinical syndromes and administering sedatives is key in planning effective prevention of these morbid complications. We studied iatrogenic delirium and coma in 100 ICU patients given midazolam and/or fentanyl, and tallied drug doses, measured plasma levels, genetic variations in metabolism and transport and inflammatory factors. Our data highlight the role drug-drug interactions play in iatrogenic coma, and refute the association between benzodiazepines and delirium. These results clarify the pathophysiology of delirium, corroborate the lack of delirium-benzodiazepine association with a benzodiazepine biological marker, i.e. serum levels, and open the debate as to which agents are useful for treating anxiety and delirium. Recent publications addressing benzodiazepine pharmacokinetics in critical care complement our data in the field of critical care sedation. A chapter on the importance of pharmacogenomics in intensive care, and a published pro-con debate as to benzodiazepine use in critical care are submitted in addition to the clinical study mentioned above as part of this master’s thesis

A ventilator strategy combining low tidal volume ventilation, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure does not increase sedative, opioid, or neuromuscular blocker use in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome and may improve patient comfort

Background: The Lung Open Ventilation Study (LOV Study) compared a low tidal volume strategy with an experimental strategy combining low tidal volume, lung recruitment maneuvers, and higher plateau and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEP) in adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Herein, we compared sedative, opioid, and neuromuscular blocker (NMB) use among patients managed with the intervention and control strategies and clinicians\u27 assessment of comfort in both groups. Methods: This was an observational substudy of the LOV Study, a randomized trial conducted in 30 intensive care units in Canada, Australia, and Saudi Arabia. In 16 centers, we recorded daily doses of sedatives, opioids, and NMBs and surveyed bedside clinicians about their own comfort with the assigned ventilator strategy and their perceptions of patient comfort. We compared characteristics and outcomes of patients who did and did not receive NMBs. Results: Study groups received similar sedative, opioid, and NMB dosing on days 1, 3, and 7. Patient comfort as assessed by clinicians was not different in the two groups: 93% perceived patients had no/minimal discomfort. In addition, 92% of clinicians were comfortable with the assigned ventilation strategy without significant differences between the two groups. When clinicians expressed discomfort, more expressed discomfort about PEEP levels in the intervention vs control group (2.9% vs 0.7%, P \u3c 0.0001), and more perceived patient discomfort among controls (6.0% vs 4.3%, P = 0.049). On multivariable analysis, the strongest associations with NMB use were higher plateau pressure (hazard ratio (HR) 1.15; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07 to 1.23; P = 0.0002) and higher daily sedative dose (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.05; P \u3c 0.0001). Patients receiving NMBs had more barotrauma, longer durations of mechanical ventilation and hospital stay, and higher mortality. Conclusions: In the LOV Study, high PEEP, low tidal volume ventilation did not increase sedative, opioid, or NMB doses in adults with ARDS, compared with a lower PEEP strategy, and appeared at least as comfortable for patients. NMB use may reflect worse lung injury, as these patients had more barotrauma, longer durations of ventilation, and higher mortality

Delirium Associated with Olanzapine Therapy in an Elderly Male with Bipolar Affective Disorder

Atypical antipsychotic medications are commonly used to treat symptoms of delirium. Olanzapine has been successfully used in the treatment of delirium. However, there have been few case reports of delirium associated with olanzapine. We hereby report a case of delirium associated with olanzapine therapy. Possible risk factors and underlying pathogenesis is discussed

Delirium Associated with Olanzapine Therapy in an Elderly Male with Bipolar Affective Disorder

Atypical antipsychotic medications are commonly used to treat symptoms of delirium. Olanzapine has been successfully used in the treatment of delirium. However, there have been few case reports of delirium associated with olanzapine. We hereby report a case of delirium associated with olanzapine therapy. Possible risk factors and underlying pathogenesis is discussed

Long-term psychosocial impact reported by childhood critical illness survivors: a systematic review

Aim: To undertake a qualitative systematic review that explores psychological and social impact, reported directly from children and adolescents at least 6 months after their critical illness. Background: Significant advances in critical care have reduced mortality from childhood critical illness, with the majority of patients being discharged alive. However, it is widely reported that surviving critical illness can be traumatic for both children and their family. Despite a growing body of literature in this field, the psychological and social impact of life threatening critical illness on child and adolescent survivors, more than 6 months post event, remains under-reported. Data sources: Searches of six online databases were conducted up to February 2012. Review methods: Predetermined criteria were used to select studies. Methodological quality was assessed using a standardized checklist. An adapted version of the thematic synthesis approach was applied to extract, code and synthesize data. Findings: Three studies met the inclusion criteria, which were all of moderate methodological quality. Initial coding and synthesis of data resulted in five descriptive themes: confusion and uncertainty, other people’s narratives, focus on former self and normality, social isolation and loss of identity, and transition and transformation. Further synthesis culminated in three analytical themes that conceptualize the childhood survivors’ psychological and social journey following critical illness. Conclusions: Critical illness in childhood can expose survivors to a complex trajectory of recovery, with enduring psychosocial adversity manifesting in the long term. Nurses and other health professionals must be aware and support the potential multifaceted psychosocial needs that may arise. Parents and families are identified as fundamental in shaping psychological and social well-being of survivors. Therefore intensive care nurses must take opportunities to raise parents’ awareness of the journey of survival and provide appropriate support. Further empirical research is warranted to explore the deficits identified with the existing literature