18 research outputs found

    Did school characteristics affect the uptake of meningococcal quadrivalent vaccine in Greater Manchester, United Kingdom?

    Get PDF
    Objectives The objective of this study was to assess if school characteristics were associated with the uptake of the meningococcal ACWY (MenACWY) vaccine in Greater Manchester in 2017/18. Study design This is an ecological cross-sectional study. Methods We analysed data on all 129 schools in seven local authorities in Greater Manchester from the Department for Education and from local child health information systems to determine whether school characteristics, including school type and Ofsted effectiveness score, were associated with vaccine uptake. Schools with no eligible pupils were excluded. We undertook single-variable and multivariable analysis and considered key interactions. Results The overall uptake rate was 80.7%, with a median uptake per school of 80.6% (interquartile range, 69.0%–87.4%). Lower vaccination rates were associated with lower overall effectiveness scores (odds ratio [OR]: 3.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.00–4.19) and lower numbers of pupils eligible for vaccination (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.28–1.51). Schools with a lower percentage of pupils for whom English is a second language and high deprivation were associated with lower uptake (OR: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.41–1.78). In addition, community schools (the schools with the most local authority oversight) had lower vaccination rates than other categories of schools. Conclusions In this study, uptake rates of the MenACWY vaccine were associated with all five school characteristics considered. Effectiveness scores for schools had the largest association with vaccine uptake, with poorer schools having lower uptake. These characteristics should be used by vaccination providers to prioritise their interventions to increase immunisation rates

    "Thinking About Drinking”: Exploring Children’s Perceptions of Alcohol Using the Draw and Write Tool);

    Get PDF
    Purpose: This qualitative study aimed to explore perceptions of alcohol held by schoolchildren using the ‘Draw and Write’ tool, to inform the planning of alcohol education in the classroom setting. Design: A specifically designed ‘Draw and Write’ booklet was used with 169 children aged 9-10 years (Year 5) across 7 primary schools in a small Local Authority in North West England. Written responses were thematically coded. Findings: Results demonstrated that the children had a good basic understanding of alcohol, including who drinks, where it can be purchased and the range of products available. Participants were aware that alcohol could be harmful and held mainly negative views. Findings suggest that alcohol education at this age is both appropriate and necessary to help children explore, understand and clarify their perceptions and misconceptions in a safe classroom environment. Practical Implications: The range and depth of responses from the children demonstrated that Draw and Write can be used successfully to explore children’s perceptions of alcohol. The tool can be used as a baseline assessment to inform classroom based alcohol education for primary school teachers and those supporting delivery at local level, in line with national policy recommendations. Originality/Value: This paper adds to the existing literature on the use of ‘Draw and Write’ in personal, social and health education, demonstrating that it can be used specifically to investigate children’s knowledge and attitudes about alcohol

    Telemonitoring and/or self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension (TASMINH4): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Self-monitoring of hypertension is associated with lower systolic blood pressure (SBP). However, evidence for the use of self-monitoring to titrate antihypertensive medication by physicians is equivocal. Furthermore, there is some evidence for the efficacy of telemonitoring in the management of hypertension but it is not clear what this adds over and above self-monitoring. This trial aims to evaluate whether GP led antihypertensive titration using self-monitoring results in lower SBP compared to usual care and whether telemonitoring adds anything to self-monitoring alone. METHODS/DESIGN: This will be a pragmatic primary care based, unblinded, randomised controlled trial of self-monitoring of BP with or without telemonitoring compared to usual care. Eligible patients will have poorly controlled hypertension (>140/90 mmHg) and will be recruited from primary care. Participants will be individually randomised to either usual care, self-monitoring alone, or self-monitoring with telemonitoring. The primary outcome of the trial will be difference in clinic SBP between intervention and control groups at 12 months adjusted for baseline SBP, gender, BP target and practice. At least 1110 patients will be sufficient to detect a difference in SBP between self-monitoring with or without telemonitoring and usual care of 5 mmHg with 90% power with an adjusted alpha of 0.017 (2-sided) to adjust for all three pairwise comparisons. Other outcomes will include adherence of anti-hypertensive medication, lifestyle behaviours, health-related quality of life, and adverse events. An economic analysis will consider both within trial costs and a model extrapolating the results thereafter. A qualitative sub study will gain insights into the views, experiences and decision making processes of patients and health care professionals focusing on the acceptability of self-monitoring and telemonitoring in the routine management of hypertension. DISCUSSION: The results of the trial will be directly applicable to primary care in the UK. If successful, self-monitoring of BP in people with hypertension would be applicable to hundreds of thousands of individuals in the UK. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 83571366 . Registered 17 July 2014.The trial is funded by an NIHR Programme grant, and by an NIHR Professorship awarded to Prof RJ McManus, the Chief Investigator. Omron have provided the blood pressure self-monitoring equipment via an unrestricted grant. Service support costs are administered through the NIHR Clinical Research Network: West Midlands. Professors Hobbs and Professor ï»żFarmer are NIHR Senior Investigators. This article presents independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under a Programme Grant for Applied Research (RP-PG-1209-10051)

    Clinical spectrum and features of activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase Ύ syndrome: A large patient cohort study.

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Activated phosphoinositide 3-kinase ÎŽ syndrome (APDS) is a recently described combined immunodeficiency resulting from gain-of-function mutations in PIK3CD, the gene encoding the catalytic subunit of phosphoinositide 3-kinase ÎŽ (PI3KÎŽ). OBJECTIVE: We sought to review the clinical, immunologic, histopathologic, and radiologic features of APDS in a large genetically defined international cohort. METHODS: We applied a clinical questionnaire and performed review of medical notes, radiology, histopathology, and laboratory investigations of 53 patients with APDS. RESULTS: Recurrent sinopulmonary infections (98%) and nonneoplastic lymphoproliferation (75%) were common, often from childhood. Other significant complications included herpesvirus infections (49%), autoinflammatory disease (34%), and lymphoma (13%). Unexpectedly, neurodevelopmental delay occurred in 19% of the cohort, suggesting a role for PI3KÎŽ in the central nervous system; consistent with this, PI3KÎŽ is broadly expressed in the developing murine central nervous system. Thoracic imaging revealed high rates of mosaic attenuation (90%) and bronchiectasis (60%). Increased IgM levels (78%), IgG deficiency (43%), and CD4 lymphopenia (84%) were significant immunologic features. No immunologic marker reliably predicted clinical severity, which ranged from asymptomatic to death in early childhood. The majority of patients received immunoglobulin replacement and antibiotic prophylaxis, and 5 patients underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Five patients died from complications of APDS. CONCLUSION: APDS is a combined immunodeficiency with multiple clinical manifestations, many with incomplete penetrance and others with variable expressivity. The severity of complications in some patients supports consideration of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe childhood disease. Clinical trials of selective PI3KÎŽ inhibitors offer new prospects for APDS treatment.T.C. is supported by National Children’s Research Centre, Our Lady’s Children’s Hospital Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland. A.C. has a Wellcome Trust Postdoctoral Training Fellowship for Clinicians (103413/Z/13/Z). K.O. is supported by funding from BBSRC, MRC, Wellcome Trust and GSK. R.D. and D.S.K are funded by National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK. C.S. and S.E. are supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF 01 EO 0803 grant to the Center of Chronic immunodeficiency and BMBF 01GM1111B grant to the PID-NET initiative). S.N.F is supported in part by the Southampton UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility and NIHR Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit. M.A.A.I. is funded by NHS Innovation London and King’s College Hospital Charitable Trust. A.F., S.L., A.D., F.R-L and S.K. are supported by the European Union’s 7th RTD Framework Programme (ERC advanced grant PID-IMMUNE contract 249816) and a government grant managed by the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche as part of the "Investments for the Future" program (ANR-10-IAHU-01). S.L. is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) (ANR-14-CE14-0028-01), the Foundation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (France), the Rare Diseases Foundation (France) and François Aupetit Association (France). S.L. is a senior scientist and S.K is a researcher at the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-CNRS (France). A.D. and S.K. are supported by the “Institut National de la SantĂ© et de la Recherche MĂ©dicale". S.K. also supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche MĂ©dicale (grant number: ING20130526624), la Ligue Contre le Cancer (ComitĂ© de Paris) and the Centre de RĂ©fĂ©rence DĂ©ficits Immunitaires HĂ©rĂ©ditaires (CEREDIH). S.O.B is supported by the Higher Education Funding Council for England. B.V. is supported by the UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I007806/1], Cancer Research UK [C23338/A15965) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre. B.V. is consultant to Karus Therapeutics (Oxford, UK). S.N. is a Wellcome Trust Senior Research Fellow in Basic Biomedical Science (095198/Z/10/Z). S.N. is also supported by the European Research Council Starting grant 260477, the EU FP7 collaborative grant 261441 (PEVNET project) and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, UK. A.M.C. is funded by the Medical Research Council, British Lung Foundation, University of Sheffield and Cambridge NIHR-BRC. Research in A.M.C. laboratory has received non-commercial grant support from GSK, Novartis, and MedImmune.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2016.06.02

    Influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients: systematic review and meta-analysis from a public health policy perspective.

    Get PDF
    Immunocompromised patients are vulnerable to severe or complicated influenza infection. Vaccination is widely recommended for this group. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients in terms of preventing influenza-like illness and laboratory confirmed influenza, serological response and adverse events

    The economic cost of measles:healthcare, public health and societal costs of the 2012-13 outbreak in Merseyside, UK

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Measles is a highly contagious vaccine-preventable infection that caused large outbreaks in England in 2012 and 2013 in areas which failed to achieve herd protection levels (95%) consistently. We sought to quantify the economic costs associated with the 2012-13 Merseyside measles outbreak, relative to the cost of extending preventative vaccination to secure herd protection. METHODS: A costing model based on a critical literature review was developed. A workshop and interviews were held with key stakeholders in the Merseyside outbreak to understand the pathway of a measles case and then quantify healthcare activity and costs for the main NHS providers and public health team incurred during the initial four month period to May 2012. These data were used to model the total costs of the full outbreak to August 2013, comprising those to healthcare providers for patient treatment, public health and societal productivity losses. The modelled total cost of the full outbreak was compared to the cost of extending the preventative vaccination programme to achieve herd protection. FINDINGS: The Merseyside outbreak included 2458 reported cases. The estimated cost of the outbreak was ÂŁ 4.4m (sensitivity analysis ÂŁ 3.9 m to ÂŁ 5.2m) comprising 15% (ÂŁ 0.7 m) NHS patient treatment costs, 40% (ÂŁ 1.8m) public health costs and 44% (ÂŁ 2.0m) for societal productivity losses. In comparison, over the previous five years in Cheshire and Merseyside a further 11,793 MMR vaccinations would have been needed to achieve herd protection at an estimated cost of ÂŁ 182,909 (4% of the total cost of the measles outbreak). INTERPRETATION: Failure to consistently reach MMR uptake levels of 95% across all localities and sectors (achieve herd protection) risks comparatively higher economic costs associated with the containment (including healthcare costs) and implementation of effective public health management of outbreaks. FUNDING: Commissioned by the Cheshire and Merseyside Public Health England Centre

    Influenza vaccination for immunocompromised patients: summary of a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Get PDF
    Vaccination of immunocompromised patients is recommended in many national guidelines to protect against severe or complicated influenza infection. However, due to uncertainties over the evidence base, implementation is frequently patchy and dependent on individual clinical discretion. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the evidence for influenza vaccination in this patient group. Healthcare databases and grey literature were searched and screened for eligibility. Data extraction and assessments of risk of bias were undertaken in duplicate, and results were synthesised narratively and using meta-analysis where possible. Our data show that whilst the serological response following vaccination of immunocompromised patients is less vigorous than in healthy controls, clinical protection is still meaningful, with only mild variation in adverse events between aetiological groups. Although we encountered significant clinical and statistical heterogeneity in many of our meta-analyses, we advocate that immunocompromised patients should be targeted for influenza vaccination
    corecore