28 research outputs found
Accelerating drug discovery for Alzheimer's disease: best practices for preclinical animal studies
Animal models have contributed significantly to our understanding of the underlying biological mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease (AD). As a result, over 300 interventions have been investigated and reported to mitigate pathological phenotypes or improve behavior in AD animal models or both. To date, however, very few of these findings have resulted in target validation in humans or successful translation to disease-modifying therapies. Challenges in translating preclinical studies to clinical trials include the inability of animal models to recapitulate the human disease, variations in breeding and colony maintenance, lack of standards in design, conduct and analysis of animal trials, and publication bias due to under-reporting of negative results in the scientific literature. The quality of animal model research on novel therapeutics can be improved by bringing the rigor of human clinical trials to animal studies. Research communities in several disease areas have developed recommendations for the conduct and reporting of preclinical studies in order to increase their validity, reproducibility, and predictive value. To address these issues in the AD community, the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation partnered with Charles River Discovery Services (Morrisville, NC, USA) and Cerebricon Ltd. (Kuopio, Finland) to convene an expert advisory panel of academic, industry, and government scientists to make recommendations on best practices for animal studies testing investigational AD therapies. The panel produced recommendations regarding the measurement, analysis, and reporting of relevant AD targets, th choice of animal model, quality control measures for breeding and colony maintenance, and preclinical animal study design. Major considerations to incorporate into preclinical study design include a priori hypotheses, pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics studies prior to proof-of-concept testing, biomarker measurements, sample size determination, and power analysis. The panel also recommended distinguishing between pilot 'exploratory' animal studies and more extensive 'therapeutic' studies to guide interpretation. Finally, the panel proposed infrastructure and resource development, such as the establishment of a public data repository in which both positive animal studies and negative ones could be reported. By promoting best practices, these recommendations can improve the methodological quality and predictive value of AD animal studies and make the translation to human clinical trials more efficient and reliable
A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research
The US National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke convened major stakeholders in June 2012 to discuss how to improve the methodological reporting of animal studies in grant applications and publications. The main workshop recommendation is that at a minimum studies should report on sample-size estimation, whether and how animals were randomized, whether investigators were blind to the treatment, and the handling of data. We recognize that achieving a meaningful improvement in the quality of reporting will require a concerted effort by investigators, reviewers, funding agencies and journal editors. Requiring better reporting of animal studies will raise awareness of the importance of rigorous study design to accelerate scientific progress
Improving our understanding of the in vivo modelling of psychotic disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Psychotic disorders represent a severe category of mental disorders affecting about one
percent of the population. Individuals experience a loss or distortion of contact with reality
alongside other symptoms, many of which are still not adequately managed using existing
treatments. While animal models of these disorders could offer insights into these disorders
and potential new treatments, translation of this knowledge has so far been poor in terms of
informing clinical trials and practice. The aim of this project was to improve our
understanding of these pre-clinical studies and identify potential weaknesses underlying
translational failure.
I carried out a systematic search of the literature to provide an unbiased summary of
publications reporting animal models of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. From
these publications, data were extracted to quantify aspects of the field including reported
quality of studies, study characteristics and behavioural outcome data. The latter of these
data were then used to calculate estimates of efficacy using random-effects meta-analysis.
Having identified 3847 publications of relevance, including 852 different methods used to
induce the model, over 359 different outcomes tested in them and almost 946 different
treatments reported to be administered. I show that a large proportion of studies use simple
pharmacological interventions to induce their models of these disorders, despite the
availability of models using other interventions that are arguably of higher translational
relevance. I also show that the reported quality of these studies is low, and only 22% of
studies report taking measures to reduce the risk of biases such as randomisation and
blinding, which has been shown to affect the reliability of results drawn.
Through this work it becomes apparent that the literature is incredibly vast for studies looking
at animal models of psychotic disorders and that some of the relevant work potentially
overlaps with studies describing other conditions. This means that drawing reliable
conclusions from these data is affected by what is made available in the literature, how it is
reported and identified in a search and the time that it takes to reach these conclusions. I
introduce the idea of using computer-assisted tools to overcome one of these problems in
the long term.
Translation of results from studies looking at animals modelling uniquely-human psychotic
disorders to clinical successes might be improved by better reporting of studies including
publishing of all work carried out, labelling of studies more uniformly so that it is identifiable,
better reporting of study design including improving on reporting of measures taken to
reduce the risk of bias and focusing on models with greater validity to the human condition
Mechanism of Ca 2+ Disruption in Alzheimer's Disease by Presenilin Regulation of InsP 3 Receptor Channel Gating
Mutations in presenilins (PS) are the major cause of familial Alzheimer's disease (FAD) and have been associated with calcium (Ca 2+) signaling abnormalities. Here, we demonstrate that FAD mutant PS1 (M146L) and PS2 (N141I) interact with the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (InsP 3R) Ca 2+ release channel and exert profound stimulatory effects on its gating activity in response to saturating and suboptimal levels of InsP 3. These interactions result in exaggerated cellular Ca 2+ signaling in response to agonist stimulation as well as enhanced low-level Ca 2+ signaling in unstimulated cells. Parallel studies in InsP 3R-expressing and -deficient cells revealed that enhanced Ca 2+ release from the endoplasmic reticulum as a result of the specific interaction of PS1-M146L with the InsP 3R stimulates amyloid beta processing, an important feature of AD pathology. These observations provide molecular insights into the "Ca 2+ dysregulation" hypothesis of AD pathogenesis and suggest novel targets for therapeutic intervention. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.link_to_subscribed_fulltex
Recommended from our members
A call for comparative effectiveness research to learn whether routine clinical care decisions can protect from dementia and cognitive decline
Common diseases like diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation are probable risk factors for dementia, suggesting that their treatments may influence the risk and rate of cognitive and functional decline. Moreover, specific therapies and medications may affect long-term brain health through mechanisms that are independent of their primary indication. While surgery, benzodiazepines, and anti-cholinergic drugs may accelerate decline or even raise the risk of dementia, other medications act directly on the brain to potentially slow the pathology that underlies Alzheimer's and other dementia. In other words, the functional and cognitive decline in vulnerable patients may be influenced by the choice of treatments for other medical conditions. Despite the importance of these questions, very little research is available. The Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation convened an advisory panel to discuss the existing evidence and to recommend strategies to accelerate the development of comparative effectiveness research on how choices in the clinical care of common chronic diseases may protect from cognitive decline and dementia