Assertion as a Language-Game: the Role of Linguistic Agency in Social-Epistemic Agency

Wittgenstein, in contrast with a number of recent epistemologists (e.g., Audi 1998, 130-48; Fricker 1994), held that hearing another person assert that p may itself constitute sufficient reason for one to believe that p — without one"s needing to have positive grounds for one"s belief that the other person is sincere or reliable. (Cf. Wittgenstein 1992, §§ 143, 160-1) In this paper I will argue that Wittgenstein"s position follows immediately from an understanding of assertion as a language-game governed by norms binding the rational action of participant speakers and hearers

What our Rylean Ancestors Knew:\ud More on Knowing How and Knowing That

In their recent article "Knowing How,�1 Jason Stanley and\ud Timothy Williamson deny that there is a fundamental\ud distinction between knowing-how and knowing-that,\ud claiming instead that knowledge-how is rather a form of\ud knowledge-that. I contend that Stanley and Williamson are\ud incorrect in rejecting the distinction between knowledgehow\ud and knowledge-that. Our Rylean ancestors, and Ryle\ud himself, had a genuine insight in recognizing knowing-how\ud and knowing-that as distinct phenomena. This discussion\ud will be divided into two sections. In section 1, I discuss\ud some implications of what I take to be our naïve notion of\ud knowing-that. In section 2, I turn to a defense of Ryle"s\ud argument in favor of the distinction between knowledgehow\ud and knowledge-that against the criticisms leveled\ud against it by Stanley and Williamson

Restricting the Weak-Generative Capacity of Synchronous Tree-Adjoining Grammars

The formalism of synchronous tree-adjoining grammars, a variant of standard tree-adjoining grammars (TAG), was intended to allow the use of TAGs for language transduction in addition to language specification. In previous work, the definition of the transduction relation defined by a synchronous TAG was given by appeal to an iterative rewriting process. The rewriting definition of derivation is problematic in that it greatly extends the expressivity of the formalism and makes the design of parsing algorithms difficult if not impossible. We introduce a simple, natural definition of synchronous tree-adjoining derivation, based on isomorphisms between standard tree-adjoining derivations, that avoids the expressivity and implementability problems of the original rewriting definition. The decrease in expressivity, which would otherwise make the method unusable, is offset by the incorporation of an alternative definition of standard tree-adjoining derivation, previously proposed for completely separate reasons, thereby making it practical to entertain using the natural definition of synchronous derivation. Nonetheless, some remaining problematic cases call for yet more flexibility in the definition; the isomorphism requirement may have to be relaxed. It remains for future research to tune the exact requirements on the allowable mappings.Comment: 21 pages, uses lingmacros.sty, psfig.sty, fullname.sty; minor typographical changes onl

Lessons from a Restricted Turing Test

We report on the recent Loebner prize competition inspired by Turing's test of intelligent behavior. The presentation covers the structure of the competition and the outcome of its first instantiation in an actual event, and an analysis of the purpose, design, and appropriateness of such a competition. We argue that the competition has no clear purpose, that its design prevents any useful outcome, and that such a competition is inappropriate given the current level of technology. We then speculate as to suitable alternatives to the Loebner prize.Comment: 20 page

Machine Learning Theory and Practice as a Source of Insight into Universal Grammar

Articl

Device measures reaction engine thrust vector deviations

Gimbal mounted test device measures thrust vector deviation of reaction engines in terms of angular displacement and thus precludes force interaction

An Alternative Conception of Tree-Adjoining Derivation

The precise formulation of derivation for tree-adjoining grammars has important ramifications for a wide variety of uses of the formalism, from syntactic analysis to semantic interpretation and statistical language modeling. We argue that the definition of tree-adjoining derivation must be reformulated in order to manifest the proper linguistic dependencies in derivations. The particular proposal is both precisely characterizable through a definition of TAG derivations as equivalence classes of ordered derivation trees, and computationally operational, by virtue of a compilation to linear indexed grammars together with an efficient algorithm for recognition and parsing according to the compiled grammar.Comment: 33 page

Recognizing Uncertainty in Speech

We address the problem of inferring a speaker's level of certainty based on prosodic information in the speech signal, which has application in speech-based dialogue systems. We show that using phrase-level prosodic features centered around the phrases causing uncertainty, in addition to utterance-level prosodic features, improves our model's level of certainty classification. In addition, our models can be used to predict which phrase a person is uncertain about. These results rely on a novel method for eliciting utterances of varying levels of certainty that allows us to compare the utility of contextually-based feature sets. We elicit level of certainty ratings from both the speakers themselves and a panel of listeners, finding that there is often a mismatch between speakers' internal states and their perceived states, and highlighting the importance of this distinction.Comment: 11 page

A uniform architecture for parsing and generation

The use of a single grammar for both parsing and generation is an idea with a certain elegance, the desirability of which several researchers have noted. In this paper, we discuss a more radical possibility: not only can a single grammar be used by different processes engaged in various "directions" of processing, but one and the same language-processing architecture can be used for processing the grammar in the various modes. In particular, parsing and generation can be viewed as two processes engaged in by a single parameterized theorem prover for the logical interpretation of the formalism. We discuss our current implementation of such an architecture, which is parameterized in such a way that it can be used for either purpose with grammars written in the PATR formalism. Furthermore, the architecture allows fine tuning to reflect different processing strategies, including parsing models intended to mimic psycholinguistic phenomena. This tuning allows the parsing system to operate within the same realm of efficiency as previous architectures for parsing alone, but with much greater flexibility for engaging in other processing regimes.Engineering and Applied Science

A simple reconstruction of GPSG

Like most linguistic theories, the theory of generalized phrase structure grammar (GPSG) has described language axiomatically, that is, as a set of universal and language-specific constraints on the well-formedness of linguistic elements of some sort. The coverage and detailed analysis of English grammar in the ambitious recent volume by Gazdar, Klein, Pullum, and Sag entitled Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar are impressive, in part because of the complexity of the axiomatic system developed by the authors. In this paper. We examine the possibility that simpler descriptions of the same theory can be achieved through a slightly different, albeit still axiomatic, method. Rather than characterize the well-formed trees directly, we progress in two stages by procedurally characterizing the well-formedness axioms themselves, which in turn characterize the trees.Engineering and Applied Science