Relational Space: Creating a Context for Innovation in Collaborative Consortia

Corporations are collaborating to meet complex global challenges heretofore considered beyond the mandate of business leaders. These multi organizational consortia are not philanthropic efforts but operate within market parameters with limited input from Non Governmental Organizations. In order to examine some dynamics of successful collaborative processes, we pursue an in-depth multi-method case study of “The Sustainability Consortium,” which has convened numerous Fortune 50 senior managers since 1999. We uncover the primacy of “relational space” – a rich context of trust and inquiry – within which participants create innovative projects for doing business in a sustainable way. Our analysis uncovers the dynamics among relational space and the action projects that ensue. We also account for the stakeholder influences and governance that form the architecture of collaboration. We develop a process model and propositions for further research

Family Planning Targets and Quality of Services: Workers' Perspectives and Dilemmas

This paper uses data from in-depth group interviews with family planning workers in Bangladesh to demonstrate both the dysfunctional influence of family planning targets on quality of care as well as the strong connection between targets and the manage ment system. The findings show that the presence of targets influenced the advice and information workers provided, pushing them towards long-term methods such as steril isation and the IUD rather than helping clients select methods most suited to their needs. The paper then shows the connection between the target system and the struc ture of official and unofficial incentives, the pattern of supervision, the system of accountability and a hierarchically organised and gender-biased organisational cul ture. The authors argue that unless these underlying managerial determinants of qual ity of care are addressed, the hope for reaching the goals of the International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) will remain illusory.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/69103/2/10.1177_097206349900100206.pd

Introduction: Why Reflect Collectively on Capacities for Change?

‘Capacity development’ implies a promise of growing self?reliance, national ownership and sustainability, yet practice seems consistently to fall short of this emancipatory promise. This introduction argues for a reframing of capacity development for emancipatory social change. Articles in this IDS Bulletin show how understanding and practice must engage with complexity, appreciate the importance of specific culture and context, and continually address the role of power in shaping relationships, understandings and practices. Values and leadership are fundamental drivers of capacity development processes. This IDS Bulletin argues against a deficit approach based on linear causal logic and replicable ‘best practice’. Instead, practitioners are encouraged to develop a detailed understanding of the culture and dynamics of specific contexts, to detect energies for positive change and work to connect and facilitate them. Learning is at the centre of the approach. Capacity development is understood as a collective process of learning in action for social change. Support for capacity development processes demands a critical development practice that implies mutual learning, with an emphasis on reflective and experiential approaches. However, this reframing implies enormous challenges for development practice, and therefore considerable personal and organisational commitment

A Learning Approach to Monitoring and Evaluation

This article draws on literature from both monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and organisational learning to explore synergies between these two fields in support of organisational performance. Two insights from the organisational learning literature are that organisations learn through ‘double?loop’ learning: reflecting on experience and using this to question critically underlying assumptions; and that power relations within an organisation will influence what and whose learning is valued and shared. This article identifies four incentives that can help link M&E with organisational learning: the incentive to learn why; the incentive to learn from below; the incentive to learn collaboratively; and the incentive to take risks. Two key elements are required to support these incentives: (1) establishing and promoting an ‘evaluative culture’ within an organisation; and (2) having accountability relationships where value is placed on learning ‘why’, as well as on learning from mistakes, which requires trust

The spiritual organization: critical reflections on the instrumentality of workplace spirituality

Authors' draft of article. Final version published by Routledge in Journal of Management, Spirituality and Religion available online at: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/14766086.aspThis paper offers a theoretical contribution to the current debate on workplace spirituality by: (a) providing a selective critical review of scholarship, research and corporate practices which treat workplace spirituality in performative terms, that is, as a resource or means to be manipulated instrumentally and appropriated for economic ends; (b) extending Ezioni’s analysis of complex organizations and proposing a new category, the ‘spiritual organization’, and; (c) positing three alternative positions with respect to workplace spirituality that follow from the preceding critique. The spiritual organization can be taken to represent the development of a trajectory of social technologies that have sought, incrementally, to control the bodies, minds, emotions and souls of employees. Alternatively, it might be employed to conceptualize the way in which employees use the workplace as a site for pursuing their own spiritualities (a reverse instrumentalism). Finally, we consider the possible incommensurability of ‘work organization’ and ‘spirituality’ discourses

Enabling sustainable energy futures: Factors influencing green supply chain collaboration

In order to explore the relationship between sustainability strategies and future energy needs and demands (hence energy futures), supply chains (SCs) need to continue to reduce their CO2 emissions through developing their green credentials and improving overall performance; noting that the assimilation of such environmental aspects into production, SCs and logistics are considered as complex processes. Knowledge management (KM) has long been seen as an enabler to support intensive collaboration efforts – on which green initiatives are largely based. The supply chain management (SCM) and KM areas have largely focused on improving organisational performance. While the latter research has yielded successful outcomes in many different sectors, there is still a scarcity of research studies focusing on identifying influential factors that highlight those aspects which may enable green supply chain collaboration (GrSCC) to occur, thus leading to sustainable energy futures and carbon-efficient production. To increase inter-organisational synchronisation, organisations often call for SC partners to implement common business processes and sources of knowledge. This paper therefore aims to contribute to the research domain by examining the role of KM in facilitating GrSCC. Through the identification of key factors extrapolated from the normative literature, a model for implementing GrSCC using a futures-based perspective is proposed. This paper inductively demonstrates the relationship between identified GrSCC factors through the application of a fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) technique. Findings from this research support a futures-based perspective that enhances understanding and refines forward-looking strategies for GrSCC. Through the exploration of two GrSCC scenarios using the given technique, this paper reports a granular perspective of positive and negative causal factors that support enabling energy futures that enhance green supply credentials

O novo velho enfoque da informação contábil

O eixo temático deste trabalho é mostrar a necessidade de se resgatar a relevância das informações contábeis no processo de gerenciamento das organizações. Ao distinguir os diferentes enfoques da Contabilidade Gerencial e Financeira e relatar as constatações de uma pesquisa de campo, aponta, também, desafios que, se bem trabalhados, poderão representar um precioso estímulo para o profissional da área contábil. Desse modo, pretende provocar uma reflexão nesse setor profissional em geral e, em particular, nos meios acadêmicos, responsáveis pela formação desses profissionais. A premissa fundamental deste trabalho é que a Contabilidade representa um instrumento gerencial por excelência e não apenas um procedimento para apuração de impostos.This paper demonstrates the need to rescue the relevance of accounting information for the organizational management process. In distinguishing the various foci of managerial and financial accounting and discussing the results of a field research, the study also points out challenges that, if seriously considered, may represent a valuable stimulus for accounting professionals. Thus, it aims at fostering a reflection in this professional sector in general and particularly in the academic sphere, which is in charge of qualifying these professionals. The fundamental premise of the study is that accounting is not just a tax assessment procedure, but a management tool par excellence