Colorectal cancer : aspects of multidisciplinary treatment, metastatic disease and sexual function

More than 6000 people in Sweden are diagnosed with colorectal cancer annually. One out of five patients already has metastases at diagnosis. However, the occurrences of metastases at specific locations, e.g. peritoneal carcinomatosis and ovarian metastases, are not well known. The development of surgical and oncological treatment strategies for primary tumours and metastatic disease has led to a need to discuss colorectal cancer patients in a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Although oncologic cure and overall survival are the main goals of treatment, quality of life and functional results are becoming increasingly important with the prolonged survival. While male sexual dysfunction after rectal cancer treatment has been well described, considerably less data have been published about the impact on women. In addition to surgical trauma, female androgen insufficiency could be a contributing factor to sexual dysfunction. Radiotherapy for rectal cancer may increase the risk of reduced ovarian androgen production, but there is scant information on this in the literature. Papers I-III are large population-based cohort studies reporting on the effects of the development and implementation of MDT-conferences in patients with metastatic disease (Paper I) and the epidemiology of peritoneal carcinomatosis and ovarian metastases in colorectal cancer patients (Papers II–III). MDT assessment and metastasis surgery were more common in rectal cancer patients than in colon cancer patients, and the proportion increased over time. Peritoneal carcinomatosis was common, and risk factors were colon cancer, advanced tumour and nodal stage, fewer than 12 examined lymph nodes, emergency surgery, and a non-radical resection of the primary tumour. Ovarian metastases were uncommon, especially in rectal cancer patients. Paper IV assesses feasibility and internal and external validity in a prospective, observational cohort study on sexual function and androgen levels in women with rectal cancer. The methods were workable and the patients’ compliance was good. Comparison of clinical data from the study cohort with that of women who were eligible for inclusion but not included revealed a selection bias. Having a partner and sexual activity was more common among women who answered all questions in the questionnaires about sexual function compared with those who did not. A power calculation based on data from the first included patients showed that a larger sample size than initially planned for was needed. In conclusion, an increasing proportion of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were discussed by the MDT. Predictors for and the occurrence of peritoneal carcinomatosis and ovarian metastases were defined, which may help to decide on individual treatment and follow-up regimens. The analysis of baseline data from the study on sexual function and androgen levels in women with rectal cancer indicates feasible methods but a selection bias. Inclusion of new patients in the study continues

Increased risk of colorectal cancer in patients diagnosed with breast cancer in women

BackgroundEpidemiological studies have shown a potential association between sex hormones and colorectal cancer. The risk of colorectal cancer in breast cancer patients who may have been exposed to increased levels of endogenous sex hormones and/or exogenous sex hormones (e.g. anti-hormonal therapy) has not been thoroughly evaluated.MethodsUsing the National Swedish Cancer Register we established a population-based prospective cohort of breast cancer patients in women diagnosed in Sweden between 1961 and 2010. Subsequent colorectal cancers were identified from the same register. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were used to estimate the risk of colorectal cancer after a diagnosis of breast cancer. The association between breast cancer therapy and risk of colorectal cancer was evaluated in a subcohort of breast cancer patients treated in Stockholm between 1977 and 2007. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%CIs were estimated using Cox regression models.ResultsIn a cohort of 179,733 breast cancer patients in Sweden, 2571 incident cases of colorectal cancer (1008 adenocarcinomas in the proximal colon, 590 in the distal colon and 808 in the rectum) were identified during an average follow-up of 9.68 years. An increased risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma was observed in the breast cancer cohort compared with that in the general population (SIR=1.59, 95%CI: 1.53, 1.65). Adenocarcinoma in the proximal colon showed a non-significantly higher SIR (1.72, 95%CI: 1.61, 1.82) compared with the distal colon (1.46, 95%CI: 1.34, 1.58). In the subcohort of 20,171 breast cancers with available treatment data, 299 cases with colorectal cancers were identified. No treatment-dependent risk of colorectal cancer was observed among the breast cancer patients.ConclusionAn increased risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma - especially in the proximal colon - was observed in the breast cancer cohort. Breast cancer treatment did not alter this risk

Increased risk of colorectal cancer in patients diagnosed with breast cancer in women.

BackgroundEpidemiological studies have shown a potential association between sex hormones and colorectal cancer. The risk of colorectal cancer in breast cancer patients who may have been exposed to increased levels of endogenous sex hormones and/or exogenous sex hormones (e.g. anti-hormonal therapy) has not been thoroughly evaluated.MethodsUsing the National Swedish Cancer Register we established a population-based prospective cohort of breast cancer patients in women diagnosed in Sweden between 1961 and 2010. Subsequent colorectal cancers were identified from the same register. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were used to estimate the risk of colorectal cancer after a diagnosis of breast cancer. The association between breast cancer therapy and risk of colorectal cancer was evaluated in a subcohort of breast cancer patients treated in Stockholm between 1977 and 2007. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95%CIs were estimated using Cox regression models.ResultsIn a cohort of 179,733 breast cancer patients in Sweden, 2571 incident cases of colorectal cancer (1008 adenocarcinomas in the proximal colon, 590 in the distal colon and 808 in the rectum) were identified during an average follow-up of 9.68 years. An increased risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma was observed in the breast cancer cohort compared with that in the general population (SIR=1.59, 95%CI: 1.53, 1.65). Adenocarcinoma in the proximal colon showed a non-significantly higher SIR (1.72, 95%CI: 1.61, 1.82) compared with the distal colon (1.46, 95%CI: 1.34, 1.58). In the subcohort of 20,171 breast cancers with available treatment data, 299 cases with colorectal cancers were identified. No treatment-dependent risk of colorectal cancer was observed among the breast cancer patients.ConclusionAn increased risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma - especially in the proximal colon - was observed in the breast cancer cohort. Breast cancer treatment did not alter this risk

Splenic flexure mobilization and anastomotic leakage in anterior resection for rectal cancer : a multicentre cohort study

Background and objective: Some colorectal surgeons advocate routine splenic flexure mobilization (SFM) when performing anterior resection for rectal cancer to ensure a tension-free anastomosis. Meta-analyses of smaller studies suggest that this approach does not influence anastomotic leakage rates, but larger multicentre studies are needed to confirm the safety of a selective strategy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of SFM on anastomotic leakage. Methods: This is a retrospective multicentre cohort study, comprising 1109 patients operated with anterior resection for rectal cancer in 2014–2018. Exposure was SFM, while anastomotic leakage within a year constituted the outcome. Stratified analyses were performed for type of mesorectal excision and surgical approach, as well as sensitivity analysis considering vascular tie placement. Multivariable Cox regression with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was employed to adjust for confounding, while multiple imputation was used for missing data. Results: SFM was performed in 381 patients (34.4%). Anastomotic leakage occurred in 83 (21.8%) and 123 (20.3%) patients operated with and without SFM, respectively. SFM was neither clearly detrimental nor beneficial regarding anastomotic leakage (adjusted HR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.59–1.15), with no apparent differences for total or partial mesorectal excision and minimally invasive or open surgery. Concurrent high vascular ligation did not impact these results, and there was no evidence of interaction from centers with a more common use of SFM. Conclusions: SFM did not seem to influence the risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer, regardless of type of mesorectal excision, use of minimally invasive surgery, or high vascular ligation

Impact of radiotherapy on bone health in women with rectal cancer- A prospective cohort study

Introduction: Pelvic radiotherapy (RT) increases the risk of pelvic insufficiency fractures. The aim was to investigate if RT is associated with changes in serum bone biomarkers in women with rectal cancer, and to examine the incidence of radiation-induced bone injuries and the association with bone biomarkers.Material and methods: Women diagnosed with rectal cancer stage I-III, planned for abdominal surgery +/- preoperative (chemo) RT, were prospectively included and followed one year. Serum bone biomarkers comprised sclerostin (regulatory of bone formation), CTX (resorption), BALP and PINP (for-mation). A subgroup was investigated with annual pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The as-sociation between RT and bone biomarkers was explored in regression models.Results: Of 134 included women, 104 had surgery with preoperative RT. The formation markers BALP and PINP increased from baseline to one year in the RT-exposed group (p &amp;lt; 0.001, longitudinal comparison). In the adjusted regression analysis, the mean increase in PINP was higher in the RT-exposed than the unexposed group (17.6 (3.6-31.5) mg/L, p = 0.013). Sclerostin and CTX did not change within groups nor differed between groups. Radiation-induced injuries were detected in 16 (42%) of 38 women with available MRI. At one year, BALP was higher among women with than without bone injuries (p = 0.018, cross-sectional comparison).Conclusions: Preoperative RT was associated with an increase in the formation marker PINP, which could represent bone recovery following RT-induced injuries, commonly observed in participants evaluated with MRI. These findings should be further explored in larger prospective studies on bone health in rectal cancer patients.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Funding Agencies|Swedish Cancer Society; Stockholm Cancer Society; Bengt Ihre Research Fellowship; Bengt Ihre Foundation; Stockholm County Council; Karolinska Institutet; Region Ostergotland</p

The modified Glasgow Prognostic Score indicates an increased risk of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer

Background: Preoperative inflammation might cause and also be a marker for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. Available biomarker indices such as the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) or the C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) may be clinically useful for leakage assessment. Methods: Patients who underwent anterior resection for rectal cancer during 2014–2018 from a multicentre retrospective cohort were included. Data from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer registry and chart review at each hospital were collected. In a subset of patients, preoperative laboratory assessments were available, constituting the exposures mGPS and CAR. Anastomotic leakage within 12 months was the outcome. Causally oriented analyses were conducted with adjustment for confounding, as well as predictive models. Results: A total of 418 patients were eligible for analysis. Most patients had mGPS = 0 (84.7%), while mGPS = 1 (10.8%) and mGPS = 2 (4.5%) were less common. mGPS = 2 (OR: 4.11; 95% CI: 1.69–10.03) seemed to confer anastomotic leakage, while this was not seen for mGPS = 1 (OR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.53–2.25). A cut off point of CAR &gt; 0.36 might be indicative of leakage (OR 2.25; 95% CI: 1.21–4.19). Predictive modelling using mGPS rendered an area-under-the-curve of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67–0.79) at most. Discussion: Preoperative inflammation seems to be involved in the development of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for cancer. Inclusion into prediction models did not result in accurate leakage prediction, but high degrees of systemic inflammation might still be important in clinical decision-making

Stoma-free survival after anastomotic leak following rectal cancer resection: worldwide cohort of 2470 patients

Background: The optimal treatment of anastomotic leak after rectal cancer resection is unclear. This worldwide cohort study aimed to provide an overview of four treatment strategies applied. Methods: Patients from 216 centres and 45 countries with anastomotic leak after rectal cancer resection between 2014 and 2018 were included. Treatment was categorized as salvage surgery, faecal diversion with passive or active (vacuum) drainage, and no primary/secondary faecal diversion. The primary outcome was 1-year stoma-free survival. In addition, passive and active drainage were compared using propensity score matching (2: 1). Results: Of 2470 evaluable patients, 388 (16.0 per cent) underwent salvage surgery, 1524 (62.0 per cent) passive drainage, 278 (11.0 per cent) active drainage, and 280 (11.0 per cent) had no faecal diversion. One-year stoma-free survival rates were 13.7, 48.3, 48.2, and 65.4 per cent respectively. Propensity score matching resulted in 556 patients with passive and 278 with active drainage. There was no statistically significant difference between these groups in 1-year stoma-free survival (OR 0.95, 95 per cent c.i. 0.66 to 1.33), with a risk difference of -1.1 (95 per cent c.i. -9.0 to 7.0) per cent. After active drainage, more patients required secondary salvage surgery (OR 2.32, 1.49 to 3.59), prolonged hospital admission (an additional 6 (95 per cent c.i. 2 to 10) days), and ICU admission (OR 1.41, 1.02 to 1.94). Mean duration of leak healing did not differ significantly (an additional 12 (-28 to 52) days). Conclusion: Primary salvage surgery or omission of faecal diversion likely correspond to the most severe and least severe leaks respectively. In patients with diverted leaks, stoma-free survival did not differ statistically between passive and active drainage, although the increased risk of secondary salvage surgery and ICU admission suggests residual confounding

SARS-CoV-2 vaccination modelling for safe surgery to save lives: data from an international prospective cohort study

Background Preoperative SARS-CoV-2 vaccination could support safer elective surgery. Vaccine numbers are limited so this study aimed to inform their prioritization by modelling. Methods The primary outcome was the number needed to vaccinate (NNV) to prevent one COVID-19-related death in 1 year. NNVs were based on postoperative SARS-CoV-2 rates and mortality in an international cohort study (surgical patients), and community SARS-CoV-2 incidence and case fatality data (general population). NNV estimates were stratified by age (18-49, 50-69, 70 or more years) and type of surgery. Best- and worst-case scenarios were used to describe uncertainty. Results NNVs were more favourable in surgical patients than the general population. The most favourable NNVs were in patients aged 70 years or more needing cancer surgery (351; best case 196, worst case 816) or non-cancer surgery (733; best case 407, worst case 1664). Both exceeded the NNV in the general population (1840; best case 1196, worst case 3066). NNVs for surgical patients remained favourable at a range of SARS-CoV-2 incidence rates in sensitivity analysis modelling. Globally, prioritizing preoperative vaccination of patients needing elective surgery ahead of the general population could prevent an additional 58 687 (best case 115 007, worst case 20 177) COVID-19-related deaths in 1 year. Conclusion As global roll out of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination proceeds, patients needing elective surgery should be prioritized ahead of the general population.The aim of this study was to inform vaccination prioritization by modelling the impact of vaccination on elective inpatient surgery. The study found that patients aged at least 70 years needing elective surgery should be prioritized alongside other high-risk groups during early vaccination programmes. Once vaccines are rolled out to younger populations, prioritizing surgical patients is advantageous