Effects of unloading and positive inotropic interventions on left ventricular function in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe aortic insufficiency.

The effect of an unloading (nifedipine, 20 mg sublingually) and of a combined unloading and positive inotropic intervention (nifedipine plus digoxin, 0.5 mg intravenously) on left ventricular performance was assessed in 48 patients with chronic severe aortic insufficiency. The left ventricular pump function-myocardial contractility relation (ejection fraction, EF vs. peak arterial pressure to end-systolic volume ratio, PAP/ESV), and the pump function-afterload relation (EF vs. mean systolic wall stress, MWS) were constructed by means of quantitative M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiography. In patients with normal control pump function (n = 14), nifedipine markedly decreased MWS, moving the patients to a new, more advantageous EF-MWS relation. In the 34 patients with abnormal pump function, the myocardial contractility level was the mean factor conditioning the response to pharmacological intervention. Patients with a value of PAP/ESV greater than 2.5 (n = 22) had normalization of EF after nifedipine and were upgraded to a more advantageous outlook for left ventricular mechanics EF-MWS and EF-PAP/ESV relations. Of the 12 patients without normalization of EF after nifedipine, only the 4 patients with PAP/ESV greater than 2 had normalization of pump function indices after combined administration of nifedipine and digoxin

Long-term survival and functional results after aortic valve replacement in asymptomatic patients with chronic severe aortic regurgitation and left ventricular dysfunction

ObjectivesWe examined the influence of medical treatment on the results of surgery in terms of long-term survival and functional results in patients with chronic, severe aortic regurgitation (AR).BackgroundAsymptomatic patients with AR and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) are at high risk because of a higher-than-expected long-term mortality. The influence of preoperative medical therapy on the outcome after aortic valve replacement (AVR) is not well known.MethodsSurgery was indicated for the appearance of a reduced LVEF (<50%). At the time of AVR, there were 134 patients treated with nifedipine (group A), and 132 received no medication (group B).ResultsOperative mortality was similar in the two groups (0.75% vs. 0.76%, p = NS). The LVEF normalized in all of group A, whereas it remained abnormal in 36 group B patients (28%). At 10-year follow-up, LVEF persisted higher in group A (62 ± 5% vs. 48 ± 4%, p < 0.001). Five-year survival was similar in the two groups (94 ± 2% vs. 94 ± 3%, p = NS). Group A showed a 10-year survival not different from expected and significantly higher than that in group B (85 ± 4% vs. 78 ± 5%, p < 0.001), which had a worse survival than expected.ConclusionsUnloading treatment with nifedipine in AR allows one to indicate AVR at the appearance of a reduced LVEF with a low operative mortality and an optimal long-term outcome. The concept of surgical correction of AR indicated for reduced LVEF may not be applied to all patients. Indeed, in a large amount of untreated patients, a reduced LVEF preoperatively is not reversed by prompt surgery, indicating irreversible myocardial damage, and 10-year survival is worse than expected

Myocardial dysfunction and abnormal left ventricular exercise response in autonomic diabetic patients

In diabetic patients, the pathophysiologic mechanisms of exercise-induced left ventricular (LV) dysfunction remain controversial. In this study, the role of myocardial contractility recruitment in determining an abnormal LV response to isometric or dynamic exercise has been investigated in 14 diabetic patients with autonomic dysfunction. Ischemic heart disease was excluded by the absence of LV wall motion abnormalities induced by isotonic and isometric exercise and by coronary angiography. Left ventricular and myocardial function were studied at rest, and during isometric and isotonic exercise, by two-dimensional echocardiography; moreover, recruitment of an inotropic reserve was assessed by postextrasystolic potentiation at rest and at peak handgrip. An abnormal response of LV ejection fraction to isometric (9/14) or to dynamic (8/14) exercise was frequent in study patients. In these patients, baseline myocardial contractility was normal, and the significant increase in ejection fraction by postextrasystolic potentiation indicated a normal contractile reserve (65 +/- 7% vs. 74 +/- 6%, p = 0.001). Nevertheless, the downward displacement of LV ejection fraction-systolic wall stress relationships during exercise suggests an inadequate increase in myocardial contractility. However, the abnormal ejection fraction at peak handgrip was completely reversed by postextrasystolic potentiation (67 +/- 6% vs. 58.1 +/- 10%, p = 0.008), a potent inotropic stimulation independent of the integrity of adrenergic cardiac receptors. A defective inotropic recruitment, despite the presence of a normal LV contractile reserve, plays an important role in deexercise LV dysfunction in diabetic patients with autonomic neuropathy