Bewegtes Leben nach Schlaganfall : ergotherapeutische Intervention mit erhöhter Bewegung bei Klienten nach einem Schlaganfall mit depressiver Symptomatik

Hintergrund: Depressive Symptome sind bei einem Schlaganfall die häufigste Begleiterscheinung. Betroffene, welche einen Schlaganfall erlitten haben, verbringen im akuten Setting einen Grossteil ihrer Zeit körperlich inaktiv. Es gibt Evidenz, dass erhöhte Bewegung, nebst vielen anderen Vorzügen, einen positiven Einfluss auf die depressive Stimmungslage hat. Ziel: In dieser Arbeit wird erläutert, welchen Einfluss erhöhte Bewegung auf die depressive Symptomatik von Klienten nach einem Schlaganfall hat. Weiter werden daraus ergotherapeutische Interventionen abgeleitet. Methode: Mittels einer systematischen Literaturrecherche wurden Resultate auf die Fragestellung gefunden. Die definierten Ein- und Ausschlusskriterien wurden bei 27 Studien geprüft. Sechs Studien wurden als Hauptstudien inkludiert und anhand des angelehnten AICA-Rasters zusammengefasst und kritisch gewürdigt. Das ergotherapeutische CMOP-E Modell wurde verwendet, um mögliche Interventionen für die Ergotherapie herzuleiten. Ergebnisse: Erhöhte Bewegung hat einen positiven Einfluss auf die psychische Stimmungslage der Klienten nach einem Schlaganfall und führt zu einer Zunahme der Lebensqualität. Diskussion: In der Arbeit wurde ein breites Spektrum von Studien betreffend auf Klienten nach einem Schlaganfall und deren psychische Veränderbarkeit bei erhöhter Bewegung abgedeckt. Das sich daraus ergebende Resultat belegt die Wichtigkeit der Klientenzentriertheit und der Edukation bei der Integration von erhöhter Bewegung in der Ergotherapie

Management control system effectiveness : the association between types of controls with employee organizational commitment across organisational life cycle stages

Purpose – This study aims to examine the association between the use of three types of controls (input, behaviour and output) with the level of employee organisational commitment (EOC) across organisational life cycle (OLC) stages. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected by a survey questionnaire from a random sample of 343 general managers in Australian manufacturing business units. Findings – The level of EOC was found to be highest in growth and revival stage units, suggesting that EOC relates to the level of innovation. The analysis revealed that the types of controls were significantly associated with the level of EOC. In particular, a significant positive association was found between input controls and the level of EOC in both the birth and revival stages. Originality/value – This study contributes to both the management control system (MCS) literature and practice. First, because only a limited number of studies have examined the effect of MCSs on the level of EOC, and there is no published study to date which has examined the association between the types of controls with the level of EOC from an OLC perspective, this study fills a gap in the literature by examining these associations. Secondly, the findings have important implications for Australian manufacturing organisations. Specifically, by providing an insight into the association between the types of controls with the level of EOC across OLC stages, the results suggest that managers of organisations in the birth and revival stage need to place greater emphasis on input controls so as to enhance the level of EOC.23 page(s

The moderating effect of organisational life cycle stages on the association between the interactive and diagnostic approaches to using controls with organisational performance ଝ

Interactive approach to using controls Diagnostic approach to using controls Organisational performance a b s t r a c t This study examines the moderating effect of organisational life cycle (OLC) stages on the association between the approach to using controls (interactive versus diagnostic) with organisational performance. Analysis is conducted in respect t

Management control systems : the role of interactive and diagnostic approaches to using controls from an organizational life cycle perspective

Purpose - This paper aims toexamine the association between the interactive and diagnostic approaches to using controls and Miller and Friesen's (1984) organizational life cycle (OLC) stages (birth, growth, maturity, revival). Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected from a random sample of 343 general managers in Australian manufacturing organizations. Findings - The results indicate that both approaches are used to a greater extent in the growth and revival stages than the birth and maturity stages, whereas the interactive and diagnostic approaches are used to a similar extent in each of the four OLC stages. Research limitations/implications - This study contributes to the management control system literature by examining the use of the interactive and diagnostic approaches from an OLC perspective. The findings highlight that the complementary nature of the interactive and diagnostic approaches applies in each OLC stages, and suggest that similar attention should be placed on the use of both the interactive and diagnostic approaches in each OLC stage. Practical implications - The study provides managers with an insight into the prevalence of the use of interactive and diagnostic approaches across the birth, growth, maturity and revival stages. Originality/value - This study contributes to the management control system literature by adopting the configuration approach to examine how multiple contingent variables simultaneously affect the approach to using controls. Specifically, this study examines how organizations adjust their emphasis on Simons' (1995) interactive and diagnostic approaches to using controls as they move across different development stages. These development stages were labelled as OLC stages and are determined based on the simultaneous consideration of multiple contingent factors.23 page(s

Management control systems from an organisational life cycle perspective : the role of input, behaviour and output controls

This study examines the association between the use of three types of controls (input, behaviour and output) and Miller and Friesen’s organisational life cycle (OLC) stages (birth, growth, maturity, revival and decline). Data were collected by a survey questionnaire from a random sample of 1,000 General Managers in Australian manufacturing business units. The results indicate that the extent of use of different controls is associated with OLC stages. Specifically, both behaviour and input controls were found to be used to a significantly greater extent than output controls in both the birth stage and the growth stage, while all three types of controls were used to a similar level in the maturity and revival stages. An examination of the extent of use of controls across OLC stages revealed that each type of control was used to a significantly greater extent in the growth and revival stages than the birth and maturity stages. The study contributes to the literature by linking management control system studies to OLC studies. Most importantly, the study assists Australian manufacturing business units in identifying the appropriate use of controls both in and across OLC stages.24 page(s

The potential of preregistration in psychology: Assessing preregistration producibility and preregistration-study consistency

Study preregistration has become increasingly popular in psychology, but its potential to restrict researcher degrees of freedom has not yet been empirically verified. We used an extensive protocol to assess the producibility (i.e., the degree to which a study can be properly conducted based on the available information) of preregistrations and the consistency between preregistrations and their corresponding papers for 300 psychology studies. We found that preregistrations often lack methodological details and that undisclosed deviations from preregistered plans are frequent. These results highlight that biases due to researcher degrees of freedom remain possible in many preregistered studies. More comprehensive registration templates typically yielded more producible preregistrations. We did not find that the producibility and consistency of preregistrations differed over time or between original and replication studies. Furthermore, we found that operationalizations of variables were generally preregistered more producible and consistently than other study parts. Inconsistencies between preregistrations and published studies were mainly encountered for data collection procedures, statistical models, and exclusion criteria. Our results indicate that, to unlock the full potential of preregistration, researchers in psychology should aim to write more producible preregistrations, adhere to these preregistrations more faithfully, and more transparently report any deviations from their preregistrations. This could be facilitated by training and education to improve preregistration skills, as well as the development of more comprehensive templates

The potential of preregistration in psychology: assessing preregistration producibility and preregistration-study consistency

Study preregistration has become increasingly popular in psychology, but its effectiveness in restricting potentially biasing researcher degrees of freedom remains unclear. We used an extensive protocol to assess the producibility (i.e., the degree to which a study can be properly conducted based on the available information) of preregistrations and the consistency between preregistration and their corresponding papers for 300 psychology studies. We found that preregistrations often lack methodological details and that undisclosed deviations from preregistered plans are frequent. Combining the producibility and consistency results highlights that biases due to researcher degrees of freedom are likely in many preregistered studies. More comprehensive registration templates typically yielded more producible and hence better preregistrations. We did not find that effectiveness of preregistrations differed over time or between original and replication studies. Furthermore, we found that operationalizations of variables were generally more effectively preregistered than other study parts. Inconsistencies between preregistrations and published studies were mainly encountered for data collection procedures, statistical models, and exclusion criteria. Our results indicate that, to unlock the full potential of preregistration, researchers in psychology should aim to write more producible preregistrations, adhere to these preregistrations more faithfully, and more transparently report any deviations from their preregistrations. This could be facilitated by training and education to improve preregistration skills, as well as the development of more comprehensive templates

The potential of preregistration in psychology: Assessing preregistration producibility and preregistration-study consistency

©American Psychological Association, [2024]. This paper is not the copy of record and may not exactly replicate the authoritative document published in the APA journal. The final article is available, upon publication, at: [ARTICLE DOI]”Study preregistration has become increasingly popular in psychology, but its potential to restrict researcher degrees of freedom has not yet been empirically verified. We used an extensive protocol to assess the producibility (i.e., the degree to which a study can be properly conducted based on the available information) of preregistrations and the consistency between preregistrations and their corresponding papers for 300 psychology studies. We found that preregistrations often lack methodological details and that undisclosed deviations from preregistered plans are frequent. These results highlight that biases due to researcher degrees of freedom remain possible in many preregistered studies. More comprehensive registration templates typically yielded more producible preregistrations. We did not find that the producibility and consistency of preregistrations differed over time or between original and replication studies. Furthermore, we found that operationalizations of variables were generally preregistered more producible and consistently than other study parts. Inconsistencies between preregistrations and published studies were mainly encountered for data collection procedures, statistical models, and exclusion criteria. Our results indicate that, to unlock the full potential of preregistration, researchers in psychology should aim to write more producible preregistrations, adhere to these preregistrations more faithfully, and more transparently report any deviations from their preregistrations. This could be facilitated by training and education to improve preregistration skills, as well as the development of more comprehensive templates.unfunde