Motif co-regulation and co-operativity are common mechanisms in transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation

A substantial portion of the regulatory interactions in the higher eukaryotic cell are mediated by simple sequence motifs in the regulatory segments of genes and (pre-)mRNAs, and in the intrinsically disordered regions of proteins. Although these regulatory modules are physicochemically distinct, they share an evolutionary plasticity that has facilitated a rapid growth of their use and resulted in their ubiquity in complex organisms. The ease of motif acquisition simplifies access to basal housekeeping functions, facilitates the co-regulation of multiple biomolecules allowing them to respond in a coordinated manner to changes in the cell state, and supports the integration of multiple signals for combinatorial decision-making. Consequently, motifs are indispensable for temporal, spatial, conditional and basal regulation at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational level. In this review, we highlight that many of the key regulatory pathways of the cell are recruited by motifs and that the ease of motif acquisition has resulted in large networks of co-regulated biomolecules. We discuss how co-operativity allows simple static motifs to perform the conditional regulation that underlies decision-making in higher eukaryotic biological systems. We observe that each gene and its products have a unique set of DNA, RNA or protein motifs that encode a regulatory program to define the logical circuitry that guides the life cycle of these biomolecules, from transcription to degradation. Finally, we contrast the regulatory properties of protein motifs and the regulatory elements of DNA and (pre-)mRNAs, advocating that co-regulation, co-operativity, and motif-driven regulatory programs are common mechanisms that emerge from the use of simple, evolutionarily plastic regulatory modules

Insulin-stimulated exocytosis of GLUT4 is enhanced by IRAP and its partner tankyrase

The glucose transporter GLUT4 and the aminopeptidase IRAP (insulin-responsive aminopeptidase) are the major cargo proteins of GSVs (GLUT4 storage vesicles) in adipocytes and myocytes. In the basal state, most GSVs are sequestered in perinuclear and other cytosolic compartments. Following insulin stimulation, GSVs undergo exocytic translocation to insert GLUT4 and IRAP into the plasma membrane. The mechanisms regulating GSV trafficking are not fully defined. In the present study, using 3T3-L1 adipocytes transfected with siRNAs (small interfering RNAs), we show that insulin-stimulated IRAP translocation remained intact despite substantial GLUT4 knockdown. By contrast, insulin-stimulated GLUT4 translocation was impaired upon IRAP knockdown, indicating that IRAP plays a role in GSV trafficking. We also show that knockdown of tankyrase, a Golgi-associated IRAP-binding protein that co-localizes with perinuclear GSVs, attenuated insulin-stimulated GSV translocation and glucose uptake without disrupting insulin-induced phosphorylation cascades. Moreover, iodixanol density gradient analyses revealed that tankyrase knockdown altered the basal-state partitioning of GLUT4 and IRAP within endosomal compartments, apparently by shifting both proteins toward less buoyant compartments. Importantly, the afore-mentioned effects of tankyrase knockdown were reproduced by treating adipocytes with PJ34, a general PARP (poly-ADP-ribose polymerase) inhibitor that abrogated tankyrase-mediated protein modification known as poly-ADP-ribosylation. Collectively, these findings suggest that physiological GSV trafficking depends in part on the presence of IRAP in these vesicles, and that this process is regulated by tankyrase and probably its PARP activity