Nano-optical observation of cascade switching in a parallel superconducting nanowire single photon detector

The device physics of parallel-wire superconducting nanowire single photon detectors is based on a cascade process. Using nano-optical techniques and a parallel wire device with spatially-separate pixels we explicitly demonstrate the single- and multi-photon triggering regimes. We develop a model for describing efficiency of a detector operating in the arm-trigger regime. We investigate the timing response of the detector when illuminating a single pixel and two pixels. We see a change in the active area of the detector between the two regimes and find the two-pixel trigger regime to have a faster timing response than the one-pixel regime.Comment: 11 pages, 2 figure

The active living gender's gap challenge: 2013-2017 Eurobarometers physical inactivity data show constant higher prevalence in women with no progress towards global reduction goals

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) considers physical inactivity (PIA) as a critical noncommunicable factor for disease and mortality, affecting more women than men. In 2013, the WHO set a 10% reduction of the PIA prevalence, with the goal to be reached by 2025. Changes in the 2013-2017 period of physical inactivity prevalence in the 28 European Union (EU) countries were evaluated to track the progress in achieving WHO 2025 target. METHODS: In 2013 and 2017 EU Special Eurobarometers, the physical activity levels reported by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire of 53,607 adults were analyzed. Data were considered as a whole sample and country-by-country. A χ2 test was used to analyze the physical inactivity prevalence (%) between countries, analyzing women and men together and separately. Additionally, PIA prevalence was analyzed between years (2013-2017) for the overall EU sample and within-country using a Z-Score for two population proportions. RESULTS: The PIA prevalence increased between 2013 and 2017 for the overall EU sample (p <  0.001), and for women (p = 0.04) and men (p < 0.001) separately. Data showed a higher PIA prevalence in women versus men during both years (p <  0.001). When separately considering changes in PIA by gender, only Belgium's women and Luxembourg's men showed a reduction in PIA prevalence. Increases in PIA prevalence over time were observed in women from Austria, Croatia, Germany, Lithuania, Malta, Portugal, Romania, and Slovakia and in men from Bulgaria, Croatia, Czechia, Germany, Italy, Lithuania, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, and Spain. CONCLUSIONS: PIA prevalence showed an overall increase across the EU and for both women and men between 2013 and 2017, with higher rates of PIA reported for women versus men during both years. PIA prevalence was reduced in only Belgium's women and Luxembourg's men. Our data indicate a limited gender-sensible approach while tacking PIA prevalence with no progress reaching global voluntary reductions of PIA for 2025

Wavelet Cycle Spinning Denoising of NDE Ultrasonic Signals Using a Random Selection of Shifts

Wavelets are a powerful tool for signal and image denoising. Most of the denoising applications in different fields were based on the thresholding of the discrete wavelet transform (DWT) coefficients. Nevertheless, DWT transform is not a time or shift invariant transform and results depend on the selected shift. Improvements on the denoising performance can be obtained using the stationary wavelet transform (SWT) (also called shift-invariant or undecimated wavelet transform). Denoising using SWT has previously shown a robust and usually better performance than denoising using DWT but with a higher computational cost. In this paper, wavelet shrinkage schemes are applied for reducing noise in synthetic and experimental non-destructive evaluation ultrasonic A-scans, using DWT and a cycle-spinning implementation of SWT. A new denoising procedure, which we call random partial cycle spinning (RPCS), is presented. It is based on a cycle-spinning over a limited number of shifts that are selected in a random way. Wavelet denoising based on DWT, SWT and RPCS have been applied to the same sets of ultrasonic A-scans and their performances in terms of SNR are compared. In all cases three well known threshold selection rules (Universal, Minimax and Sure), with decomposition level dependent selection, have been used. It is shown that the new procedure provides a good robust denoising performance, without the DWT fluctuating performance, and close to SWT but with a much lower computational cost.This work was partially supported by Spanish MCI Project DPI2011-22438San Emeterio Prieto, JL.; Rodríguez-Hernández, MA. (2015). Wavelet Cycle Spinning Denoising of NDE Ultrasonic Signals Using a Random Selection of Shifts. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation. 34(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10921-014-0270-8S18341Galloway, R.L., McDermott, B.A., Thurstone, F.L.: A frequency diversity process for speckle reduction in real-time ultrasonic images. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 35, 45–49 (1988)Newhouse, V.L., Bilgutay, N.M., Saniie, J., Furgason, E.S.: Flaw-to-grain echo enhancement by split spectrum processing. Ultrasonics 20, 59–68 (1982)Karpur, P., Canelones, O.J.: Split spectrum processing: a new filtering approach for improved signal-to-noise ratio enhancement of ultrasonic signals. Ultrasonics 30, 351–357 (1992)Donoho, D.L., Johnstone, I.M.: Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81, 425–455 (1994)Donoho, D.L., Johnstone, I.M., Kerkyacharian, G., Picard, D.: Wavelet shrinkage: asymptotia? J. R Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 301–369 (1995)Donoho, D.L., Johnstone, I.M.: Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 1200–1224 (1995)Johnstone, I.M., Silverman, B.W.: Wavelet threshold estimators for data with correlated noise. J. R Stat. Soc. 59, 319–351 (1997)Jansen, M.: Noise Reduction by Wavelet Thresholding. Lecture Notes in Statistics 161. Springer, New York (2001). doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-0145-5Nason, G.P., Silverman, B.W.:The stationary wavelet transform and some statistical applications. In: Antoniadis, A., Oppenheim, G. (eds.) Wavelets and Statistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 103, pp 281–299. Springer, New York (1995)Lang, M., Guo, H., Odegard, J.E., Burrus, C.S.: Noise reduction using an undecimated discrete wavelet transform. IEEE Signal Proc. Lett. 3, 10–12 (1996)Coifman, R.R., Donoho, D.L.: Translation-invariant de-noising. In: Antoniadis, A., Oppenheim, G. (eds.) Wavelets and Statistics. Lecture Notes in Statistics, vol. 103, pp 125–150, Springer, New York (1995) .Abbate, A., Koay, J., Frankel, J., Schroeder, S.C., Das, P.: Signal detection and noise suppression using a wavelet transform signal processor: application to ultrasonic flaw detection. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 44, 14–26 (1997)Lázaro, J.C., San Emeterio, J.L., Ramos, A., Fernandez, J.L.: Influence of thresholding procedures in ultrasonic grain noise reduction using wavelets. Ultrasonics 40, 263–267 (2002)Matz, V., Smid, R., Starman, S., Kreidl, M.: Signal-to-noise ratio enhancement based on wavelet filtering in ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonics 49, 752–759 (2009)Kubinyi, M., Kreibich, O., Neuzil, J., Smid, R.: EMAT noise suppression using information fusion in stationary wavelet packets. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 58, 1027–1036 (2011)Shi, G.M., Chen, X.Y., Song, X.X., Qui, F., Ding, A.L.: Signal matching wavelet for ultrasonic flaw detection in high background noise. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 58, 776–787 (2011)Song, S.P., Que, P.W.: Wavelet based noise suppression technique and its application to ultrasonic flaw detection. Ultrasonics 44, 188–193 (2006)Rodriguez, M.A., San Emeterio, J.L., Lázaro, J.C., Ramos, A.: Ultrasonic flaw detection in NDE of highly scattering materials using wavelet and Wigner-Ville transform processing. Ultrasonics 42, 847–851 (2004)Zhang, G.M., Zhang, S.Y., Wang, Y.W.: Application of adaptive time-frequency decomposition in ultrasonic NDE of highly-scattering materials. Ultrasonics 38, 961–964 (2000)Drai, R., Khelil, M., Benchaala, A.: Time frequency and wavelet transform applied to selected problems in ultrasonics NDE. NDT & E Int. 35, 567–572 (2002)Pardo, E., San Emeterio, J.L.: Noise reduction in ultrasonic NDT using undecimated wavelet transforms. Ultrasonics 44, e1063–e1067 (2006)Kechida, A., Drai, R., Guessoum, A.: Texture analysis for flaw detection in ultrasonic images. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 31, 108–116 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s10921-011-0126-4Rucka, M., Wilde, K.: Experimental study on ultrasonic monitoring of splitting failure in reinforced concrete. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 32, 372–383 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s10921-013-0191-yHosseini, S.M.H., Duczek, S., Gabbert, U.: Damage localization in plates using mode conversion characteristics of ultrasonic guided waves. J. Nondestruct. Eval. 33, 152–165 (2014). doi: 10.1007/s10921-013-0211-yMohammed, M.S., Ki-Seong, K.: Shift-invariant wavelet packet for signal de-noising in ultrasonic testing. Insight 54, 366–370 (2012)San Emeterio, J.L., Rodriguez-Hernandez, M.A.: Wavelet denoising of ultrasonic A-scans by random partial cycle spinning. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. pp 455–458.Mallat, S.G.: A theory of multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 11, 674–693 (1989)Shensa, M.J.: The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the à trous and Mallat algorithms. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 40, 2464–2482 (1992). doi: 10.1109/78.157290Beylkin, G., Coifman, R., Rokhlin, V.: Fast wavelet transforms and numerical algorithms. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 44, 141–183 (1991)Daubechies, I.: Ten Lectures on Wavelets. SIAM, Philadelphia (1992)Romijn, R.L., Thijssen, J.M., Vanbeuningen, G.W.J.: Estimation of scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound: a simulation study. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 36, 593–606 (1989)Gustafsson, M.G., Stepinski, T.: Studies of split spectrum processing, optimal detection, and maximum likehood amplitude estimation using a simple clutter model. Ultrasonics 35, 31–53 (1997