Overutilization of endoscopic surveillance in nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus: a multicenter study

Guidelines suggest that patients with non-dysplastic BE undergo endoscopic surveillance every 3–5 years, but actual utilization of surveillance endoscopy and the determinants of variation in surveillance intervals are not known

Characteristics of ascitic fluid in the alcoholic cirrhotic

A prospective study was conducted to define the characteristics of ascitic fluid in alcoholic cirrhotics with and without spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP); to correlate these with findings in the peripheral blood; and to determine whether the use of counterimmunoelectrophoresis (CIE) for bacterial antigens will aid in the early diagnosis of SBP. Fifty-one alcoholic cirrhotics had simultaneous determination of their blood or serum and ascitic fluid for the following: WBC and differential count, RBC, LDH, amylase, glucose, total protein, and protein electrophoresis, CIE for pneumococcal and Klebsiella antigens, culture for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and mycobacteria, and cytology. Of the 51 patients, 2 had SBP (4%). In the other 49 patients (54 sera and ascitic fluids), CIE was positive for pneumococcal antigen in 4/54 sera and in 3/54 ascitic fluids. The mean WBC count in the ascitic fluid was 349. In 4% the count was above 1000, in 18% between 501–1000, and in 32% between 301–500; polymorphs were >30% in 19/54 (32%). Specific gravity was >1.020 in 10/54 (22%), and ascitic fluid total protein of 3.0g/100 ml or above was noted in 24% (12/54). Mean ascitic fluid/serum ratios of total protein, albumin, and globulin were 0.31, 0.33, and 0.30 respectively, and mean ascitic fluid/serum ratios of LDH, amylase, and glucose were 0.54, 0.79, and 1.04. All cultures (except those with SBP) and cytology were negative. Our study confirmed the observation of others, that a significant number of noninfected cirrhotics have increased ascitic fluid WBC, % polymorphs, specific gravity, and total protein concentration. CIE was not helpful in the early diagnosis of SBP.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/44388/1/10620_2005_Article_BF01333710.pd

BOB CAT: a Large-Scale Review and Delphi Consensus for Management of Barrett’s Esophagus With No Dysplasia, Indefinite for, or Low-Grade Dysplasia

OBJECTIVES: Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is a common premalignant lesion for which surveillance is recommended. This strategy is limited by considerable variations in clinical practice. We conducted an international, multidisciplinary, systematic search and evidence-based review of BE and provided consensus recommendations for clinical use in patients with nondysplastic, indefinite, and low-grade dysplasia (LGD). METHODS: We defined the scope, proposed statements, and searched electronic databases, yielding 20,558 publications that were screened, selected online, and formed the evidence base. We used a Delphi consensus process, with an 80% agreement threshold, using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) to categorize the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. RESULTS: In total, 80% of respondents agreed with 55 of 127 statements in the final voting rounds. Population endoscopic screening is not recommended and screening should target only very high-risk cases of males aged over 60 years with chronic uncontrolled reflux. A new international definition of BE was agreed upon. For any degree of dysplasia, at least two specialist gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists are required. Risk factors for cancer include male gender, length of BE, and central obesity. Endoscopic resection should be used for visible, nodular areas. Surveillance is not recommended for <5 years of life expectancy. Management strategies for indefinite dysplasia (IND) and LGD were identified, including a de-escalation strategy for lower-risk patients and escalation to intervention with follow-up for higher-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this uniquely large consensus process in gastroenterology, we made key clinical recommendations for the escalation/de-escalation of BE in clinical practice. We made strong recommendations for the prioritization of future research

A Multicenter, Double-Blinded Validation Study of Methylation Biomarkers for Progression Prediction in Barrett's Esophagus

Esophageal adenocarcinoma risk in Barrett’s esophagus (BE) is increased 30- to 125-fold versus the general population. Among all BE patients, however, neoplastic progression occurs only once per 200 patient-years. Molecular biomarkers are therefore needed to risk-stratify patients for more efficient surveillance endoscopy and to improve the early detection of progression. We therefore performed a retrospective, multicenter, double-blinded validation study of 8 BE progression prediction methylation biomarkers. Progression or nonprogression were determined at 2 years (tier 1) and 4 years (tier 2). Methylation was assayed in 145 nonprogressors (NPs) and 50 progressors (Ps) using real-time quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Ps were significantly older than NPs (70.6 vs. 62.5 years, p < 0.001). We evaluated a linear combination of the 8 markers, using coefficients from a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) were high in the 2-, 4-year and combined data models (0.843, 0.829 and 0.840; p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). In addition, even after rigorous overfitting correction, the incremental AUCs contributed by panels based on the 8 markers plus age vs. age alone were substantial (Δ-AUC = 0.152, 0.114 and 0.118, respectively) in all three models. A methylation biomarker-based panel to predict neoplastic progression in BE has potential clinical value in improving both the efficiency of surveillance endoscopy and the early detection of neoplasia

Durability of Radiofrequency Ablation in Barrett's Esophagus With Dysplasia

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) can eradicate dysplasia and intestinal metaplasia in patients with dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (BE), and reduce rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma. We assessed long-term rates of eradication, durability of neosquamous epithelium, disease progression, and safety of RFA in patients with dysplastic BE