13 research outputs found

    K+ channel openers restore verapamil-inhibited lung fluid resolution and transepithelial ion transport

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Lung epithelial Na<sup>+ </sup>channels (ENaC) are regulated by cell Ca<sup>2+ </sup>signal, which may contribute to calcium antagonist-induced noncardiogenic lung edema. Although K<sup>+ </sup>channel modulators regulate ENaC activity in normal lungs, the therapeutical relevance and the underlying mechanisms have not been completely explored. We hypothesized that K<sup>+ </sup>channel openers may restore calcium channel blocker-inhibited alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) by up-regulating both apical and basolateral ion transport.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Verapamil-induced depression of heterologously expressed human αβγ ENaC in <it>Xenopus </it>oocytes, apical and basolateral ion transport in monolayers of human lung epithelial cells (H441), and <it>in vivo </it>alveolar fluid clearance were measured, respectively, using the two-electrode voltage clamp, Ussing chamber, and BSA protein assays. Ca<sup>2+ </sup>signal in H441 cells was analyzed using Fluo 4AM.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The rate of <it>in vivo </it>AFC was reduced significantly (40.6 ± 6.3% of control, <it>P </it>< 0.05, n = 12) in mice intratracheally administrated verapamil. K<sub>Ca3.1 </sub>(1-EBIO) and K<sub>ATP </sub>(minoxidil) channel openers significantly recovered AFC. In addition to short-circuit current (Isc) in intact H441 monolayers, both apical and basolateral Isc levels were reduced by verapamil in permeabilized monolayers. Moreover, verapamil significantly altered Ca<sup>2+ </sup>signal evoked by ionomycin in H441 cells. Depletion of cytosolic Ca<sup>2+ </sup>in αβγ ENaC-expressing oocytes completely abolished verapamil-induced inhibition. Intriguingly, K<sub>V </sub>(pyrithione-Na), K <sub>Ca3.1 </sub>(1-EBIO), and K<sub>ATP </sub>(minoxidil) channel openers almost completely restored the verapamil-induced decrease in Isc levels by diversely up-regulating apical and basolateral Na<sup>+ </sup>and K<sup>+ </sup>transport pathways.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Our observations demonstrate that K<sup>+ </sup>channel openers are capable of rescuing reduced vectorial Na<sup>+ </sup>transport across lung epithelial cells with impaired Ca<sup>2+ </sup>signal.</p

    Polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, and bendamustine combination in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a real-world data from Turkey

    Get PDF
    Polatuzumab vedotin (Pola) with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) is a promising option for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). We analyzed the data of 71 R/R DLBCL patients who had been treated with Pola-BR in the named patient program from March 2018 to April 2021 from 32 centers in Turkey. All patients received up to six cycles of Pola 1.8 mg/kg, rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 1, and bendamustine 90 mg/m(2) on days 1-2 of each cycle. Median age at Pola-BR initiation was 55 (19-84). The overall response rate was 47.9%, including 32.4% CR rate when a median of 3 cycles was applied. With a median follow-up of 5 months, the median OS was 5 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common hematological toxicities. The real-world data from our cohort showed the Pola-BR is an effective option with a manageable toxicity profile

    Experts Consensus Recommendations for the Management of Calcium Channel Blocker Poisoning in Adults

    Get PDF
    OBJECTIVE: To provide a management approach for adults with calcium channel blocker poisoning. DATA SOURCES, STUDY SELECTION, AND DATA EXTRACTION: Following the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II instrument, initial voting statements were constructed based on summaries outlining the evidence, risks, and benefits. DATA SYNTHESIS: We recommend 1) for asymptomatic patients, observation and consideration of decontamination following a potentially toxic calcium channel blocker ingestion (1D); 2) as first-line therapies (prioritized based on desired effect), IV calcium (1D), high-dose insulin therapy (1D-2D), and norepinephrine and/or epinephrine (1D). We also suggest dobutamine or epinephrine in the presence of cardiogenic shock (2D) and atropine in the presence of symptomatic bradycardia or conduction disturbance (2D); 3) in patients refractory to the first-line treatments, we suggest incremental doses of high-dose insulin therapy if myocardial dysfunction is present (2D), IV lipid-emulsion therapy (2D), and using a pacemaker in the presence of unstable bradycardia or high-grade arteriovenous block without significant alteration in cardiac inotropism (2D); 4) in patients with refractory shock or who are periarrest, we recommend incremental doses of high-dose insulin (1D) and IV lipid-emulsion therapy (1D) if not already tried. We suggest venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, if available, when refractory shock has a significant cardiogenic component (2D), and using pacemaker in the presence of unstable bradycardia or high-grade arteriovenous block in the absence of myocardial dysfunction (2D) if not already tried; 5) in patients with cardiac arrest, we recommend IV calcium in addition to the standard advanced cardiac life-support (1D), lipid-emulsion therapy (1D), and we suggest venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation if available (2D). CONCLUSION: We offer recommendations for the stepwise management of calcium channel blocker toxicity. For all interventions, the level of evidence was very low
    corecore