The transcriptional regulator BBX24 impairs DELLA activity to promote shade avoidance in Arabidopsis thaliana

[EN] In response to canopy shade, plant vegetative structures elongate to gain access to light. However, the mechanism that allows a plastic transcriptional response to canopy shade light is not fully elucidated. Here we propose that the activity of PIF4, a key transcription factor in the shade signalling network, is modulated by the interplay between the BBX24 transcriptional regulator and DELLA proteins, which are negative regulators of the gibberellin (GA) signalling pathway. We show that GA-related targets are enriched among genes responsive to BBX24 under shade and that the shade-response defect in bbx24 mutants is rescued by a GA treatment that promotes DELLA degradation. BBX24 physically interacts with DELLA proteins and alleviates DELLA-mediated repression of PIF4 activity. The proposed molecular mechanism provides reversible regulation of the activity of a key transcription factor that may prove especially relevant under fluctuating light conditions.We thank Santiago Mora Garcia for valuable initial discussions and Peter Quail for the PIL1::LUC construct. This work was supported by grants from Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, and Universidad de Buenos Aires (to J.F.B), and the Spanish Ministry of Science, BIO2010-15071 (to M.A.B.).Crocco, C.; Locascio ., AAM.; Escudero, CM.; Alabadí Diego, D.; Blazquez Rodriguez, MA.; Botto, J. (2015). The transcriptional regulator BBX24 impairs DELLA activity to promote shade avoidance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Communications. 6:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7202S1106Valladares, F. & Niinemets, U. Shade tolerance, a key plant feature of complex nature and consequences. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 237–257 (2008).Casal, J. J. Photoreceptor signaling networks in plant responses to shade. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 403–427 (2013).Botto, J. F. & Coluccio, M. P. Seasonal and plant-density dependency for quantitative trait loci affecting flowering time in multiple populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Environ. 30, 1465–1479 (2007).Coluccio, M. P., Sánchez, S., Kasulin, L., Yanovsky, M. J. & Botto, J. F. Genetic mapping of natural variation in a shade avoidance response: ELF3 is the candidate gene for a QTL in hypocotyl growth regulation. J. Exp. Bot. 62, 167–176 (2011).Filiault, D. L. & Maloof, J. N. A genome-wide association study identifies variants underlying the Arabidopsis thaliana shade avoidance response. PLoS. Genet. 8, e1002589 (2012).Kasulin, L., Agrofoglio, Y. & Botto, J. F. The receptor-like kinase ERECTA contributes to the shade-avoidance syndrome in a background-dependent manner. Ann. Bot. 111, 811–819 (2013).Leivar, P. & Monte, E. PIFs: systems integrators in plant development. Plant Cell 26, 56–78 (2014).Lorrain, S., Allen, T., Duek, P. D., Whitelam, G. C. & Fankhauser, C. Phytochrome-mediated inhibition of shade avoidance involves degradation of growth-promoting bHLH transcription factors. Plant J. 53, 312–323 (2008).Hornitschek, P., Lorrain, S., Zoete, V., Michielin, O. & Fankhauser, C. Inhibition of the shade avoidance response by formation of non-DNA binding bHLH heterodimers. EMBO J. 28, 3893–3902 (2009).Gangappa, S. N. & Botto, J. F. The BBX family of plant transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 460–470 (2014).Crocco, C. D., Holm, M., Yanovsky, M. J. & Botto, J. F. AtBBX21 and COP1 genetically interact in the regulation of shade avoidance. Plant J. 64, 551–562 (2010).Gangappa, S. N. et al. The Arabidopsis B-BOX protein BBX25 interacts with HY5, negatively regulating BBX22 expression to suppress seedling photomorphogenesis. Plant Cell 25, 1243–1257 (2013).Devlin, F. P., Yanovsky, M. J. & Kay, S. A. A genomic analysis of the shade avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 133, 1–13 (2003).Hisamatsu, T., King, R. W., Helliwell, C. A. & Koshioka, M. The involvement of gibberellin 20-oxidase genes in phytochrome-regulated petiole elongation of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 138, 1106–1116 (2005).Locascio, A., Blázquez, M. A. & Alabadí, D. Genomic analysis of DELLA protein activity. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 1229–1237 (2013).de Lucas, M. et al. A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature 451, 480–486 (2008).Feng, S. et al. Coordinated regulation of Arabidopsis thaliana development by light and gibberellins. Nature 451, 475–480 (2008).Djakovic-Petrovic, T., de Wit, M., Voesenek, L. A. C. J. & Pierik, R. DELLA protein function in growth responses to canopy signals. Plant J. 51, 117–126 (2007).Pierik, R., de Wit, M. & Voesenek, L. A. C. J. Growth-mediated stress escape: convergence of signal transduction pathways activated upon exposure to two different environmental stresses. New Phytol. 189, 122–134 (2011).Colebrook, E. H., Thomas, S. G., Phillips, A. L. & Hedden, P. The role of gibberellin signalling in plant responses to abiotic stress. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 67–75 (2014).Holtan, H. E. et al. BBX32, an Arabidopsis B-Box protein, functions in light signaling by suppressing HY5-regulated gene expression and interacting with STH2/BBX21. Plant Physiol. 156, 2109–2123 (2011).Xu, D. et al. Convergence of light and ABA signaling on the ABI5 promoter. PLoS. Genet. 10, e1004197 (2014).Pierik, R., Djakovic-Petrovic, T., Keuskamp, D. H., de Wit, M. & Voesenek, L. A. C. J. Auxin and ethylene regulate elongation responses to neighbor proximity signals independent of gibberellin and DELLA proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 149, 1701–1712 (2009).Keuskamp, D. H. et al. Blue-light-mediated shade avoidance requires combined auxin and brassinosteroid action in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant J. 67, 208–217 (2011).Li, L. et al. Linking photoreceptor excitation to changes in plant architecture. Genes Dev. 26, 785–790 (2012).Hornitschek, P. et al. Phytochrome interacting factors 4 and 5 control seedling growth in changing light conditions by directly controlling auxin signaling. Plant J. 71, 699–711 (2012).Leivar, P. et al. Dynamic antagonism between phytochromes and PIF family basic helix-loop-helix factors induces selective reciprocal responses to light and shade in a rapidly responsive transcriptional network in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 1398–1419 (2012).Oh, E., Zhu, J.-Y. & Wang, Z.-Y. Interaction between BZR1 and PIF4 integrates brassinosteroid and environmental responses. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 802–809 (2012).Dill, A. & Sun, T. P. Synergistic derepression of gibberellin signaling by removing RGA and GAI function in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 159, 777–785 (2001).Cole, B., Kay, S. A. & Chory, J. Automated analysis of hypocotyl growth dynamics during shade avoidance in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 65, 991–1000 (2011).Zhang, Y. et al. A quartet of PIF bHLH factors provides a transcriptionally centered signaling hub that regulates seedling morphogenesis through differential expression-patterning of shared target genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS. Genet. 9, e1003244 (2013).Leivar, P. et al. Definition of early transcriptional circuitry involved in light-induced reversal of PIF-imposed repression of photomorphogenesis in young Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 21, 3535–3553 (2009).Willige, B. C. et al. The DELLA domain of GA INSENSITIVE mediates the interaction with the GA INSENSITIVE DWARF1A gibberellin receptor of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 1209–1220 (2007).Davière, J.-M. & Achard, P. Gibberellin signaling in plants. Develop 140, 1147–1151 (2013).Lim, S. et al. ABA-INSENSITIVE3, ABA-INSENSITIVE5, and DELLAs interact to activate the expression of SOMNUS and other high-temperature-inducible genes in imbibed seeds in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 25, 4863–4878 (2013).Yoshida, H. et al. DELLA protein functions as a transcriptional activator through the DNA binding of the indeterminate domain family proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7861–7866 (2014).Yamaguchi, N. et al. Gibberellin acts positively then negatively to control onset of flower formation in Arabidopsis. Science 344, 638–641 (2014).Stavang, J. et al. Hormonal regulation of temperature-induced growth in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 60, 589–601 (2009).Achard, P. et al. DELLAs contribute to plant photomorphogenesis. Plant Physiol. 143, 1163–1172 (2007).Arana, M. V., Marín-de la Rosa, N., Maloof, J. N., Blázquez, M. A. & Alabadí, D. Circadian oscillation of gibberellin signaling in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9292–9297 (2011).Bai, M.-Y., Fan, M., Oh, E. & Wang, Z.-Y. A triple helix-loop-helix/basic helix-loop-helix cascade controls cell elongation downstream of multiple hormonal and environmental signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 4917–4929 (2012).Ikeda, M., Fujiwara, S., Mitsuda, N. & Ohme-Takagi, M. A triantagonistic basic helix-loop-helix system regulates cell elongation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 24, 4483–4497 (2012).Yang, D.-L. et al. Plant hormone jasmonate prioritizes defense over growth by interfering with gibberellin signaling cascade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E1192–E1200 (2012).Ciolfi, A. et al. Dynamics of the shade-avoidance response in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 163, 331–353 (2013).Indorf, M., Cordero, J., Neuhaus, G. & Rodríguez-Franco, M. Salt tolerance (STO), a stress-related protein, has a major role in light signalling. Plant J. 51, 563–574 (2007).Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Kami, C., Fankhauser, C., Alabadí, D. & Blázquez, M. A. A hormonal regulatory module that provides flexibility to tropic responses. Plant Physiol. 156, 1819–1825 (2011).Earley, K. W. et al. Gateway-compatible vectors for plant functional genomics and proteomics. Plant J. 45, 616–629 (2006).Tusher, V. G., Tibshirani, R. & Chu, G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 5116–5121 (2001).Gallego-Bartolomé, J. et al. Molecular mechanism for the interaction between gibberellin and brassinosteroid signaling pathways in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 13446–13451 (2012).Belda-Palazón, B. et al. Aminopropyltransferases involved in polyamine biosynthesis localize preferentially in the nucleus of plant cells. PLoS ONE 7, e46907 (2012).Gallego-Bartolomé, J., Alabadí, D. & Blázquez, M. A. DELLA-induced early transcriptional changes during etiolated development in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 6, e23918 (2011).Piskurewicz, U. et al. The gibberellic acid signaling repressor RGL2 inhibits Arabidopsis seed germination by stimulating abscisic acid synthesis and ABI5 activity. Plant Cell 20, 2729–2745 (2008).Paz-Ares, J. REGIA, an EU project on functional genomics of transcription factors from Arabidopsis thaliana. Comp. Funct. Genomics 3, 102–108 (2002)

Spatiotemporal progression of ubiquitin-proteasome system inhibition after status epilepticus suggests protective adaptation against hippocampal injury

BACKGROUND: The ubiquitin-proteasome-system (UPS) is the major intracellular pathway leading to the degradation of unwanted and/or misfolded soluble proteins. This includes proteins regulating cellular survival, synaptic plasticity and neurotransmitter signaling; processes controlling excitability thresholds that are altered by epileptogenic insults. Dysfunction of the UPS has been reported to occur in a brain region- and cell-specific manner and contribute to disease progression in acute and chronic brain diseases. Prolonged seizures, status epilepticus, may alter UPS function but there has been no systematic attempt to map when and where this occurs in vivo or to determine the consequences of proteasome inhibition on seizure-induced brain injury. METHOD: To determine whether seizures lead to an impairment of the UPS, we used a mouse model of status epilepticus whereby seizures are triggered by an intra-amygdala injection of kainic acid. Status epilepticus in this model causes cell death in selected brain areas, in particular the ipsilateral CA3 subfield of the hippocampus, and the development of epilepsy after a short latent period. To monitor seizure-induced dysfunction of the UPS we used a UPS inhibition reporter mouse expressing the ubiquitin fusion degradation substrate ubiquitin(G76V)-green fluorescent protein. Treatment with the specific proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin was used to establish the impact of proteasome inhibition on seizure-induced pathology. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our studies show that status epilepticus induced by intra-amygdala kainic acid causes select spatio-temporal UPS inhibition which is most evident in damage-resistant regions of the hippocampus, including CA1 pyramidal and dentate granule neurons then appears later in astrocytes. In support of this exerting a beneficial effect, injection of mice with the proteasome inhibitor epoxomicin protected the normally vulnerable hippocampal CA3 subfield from seizure-induced neuronal death in the model. These studies reveal brain region- and cell-specific UPS impairment occurs after seizures and suggest UPS inhibition can protect against seizure-induced brain damage. Identifying networks or pathways regulated through the proteasome after seizures may yield novel target genes for the treatment of seizure-induced cell death and possibly epilepsy

Site-specific proteasome phosphorylation controls cell proliferation and tumorigenesis

Despite the fundamental importance of proteasomal degradation in cells, little is known about whether and how the 26S proteasome itself is regulated in coordination with various physiological processes. Here we show that the proteasome is dynamically phosphorylated during the cell cycle at Thr 25 of the 19S subunit Rpt3. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing, RNA interference and biochemical studies demonstrate that blocking Rpt3-Thr25 phosphorylation markedly impairs proteasome activity and impedes cell proliferation. Through a kinome-wide screen, we have identified dual-specificity tyrosine-regulated kinase 2 (DYRK2) as the primary kinase that phosphorylates Rpt3-Thr25, leading to enhanced substrate translocation and degradation. Importantly, loss of the single phosphorylation of Rpt3-Thr25 or knockout of DYRK2 significantly inhibits tumour formation by proteasome-addicted human breast cancer cells in mice. These findings define an important mechanism for proteasome regulation and demonstrate the biological significance of proteasome phosphorylation in regulating cell proliferation and tumorigenesis

Memory reconsolidation may be disrupted by a distractor stimulus presented during reactivation

Memories can be destabilized by the reexposure to the training context, and may reconsolidate into a modified engram. Reconsolidation relies on some particular molecular mechanisms involving LVGCCs and GluN2B-containing NMDARs. In this study we investigate the interference caused by the presence of a distractor - a brief, unanticipated stimulus that impair a fear memory expression - during the reactivation session, and tested the hypothesis that this disruptive effect relies on a reconsolidation process. Rats previously trained in the contextual fear conditioning (CFC) were reactivated in the presence or absence of a distractor stimulus. In the test, groups reactivated in the original context with distractor displayed a reduction of the freezing response lasting up to 20 days. To check for the involvement of destabilization / reconsolidation mechanisms, we studied the effect of systemic nimodipine (a L-VGCC blocker) or intra-CA1 ifenprodil (a selective GluN2B/NMDAR antagonist) infused right before the reactivation session. Both treatments were able to prevent the disruptive effect of distraction. Ifenprodil results also bolstered the case for hippocampus as the putative brain structure hosting this phenomenon. Our results provide some evidence in support of a behavioral, non-invasive procedure that was able to disrupt an aversive memory in a long-lasting way