Breakthrough infections due to SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant: relation to humoral and cellular vaccine responses

IntroductionCOVID-19 vaccines are expected to provide effective protection. However, emerging strains can cause breakthrough infection in vaccinated individuals. The immune response of vaccinated individuals who have experienced breakthrough infection is still poorly understood.MethodsHere, we studied the humoral and cellular immune responses of fully vaccinated individuals who subsequently experienced breakthrough infection due to the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 and correlated them with the severity of the disease.ResultsIn this study, an effective humoral response alone was not sufficient to induce effective immune protection against severe breakthrough infection, which also required effective cell-mediated immunity to SARS-CoV-2. Patients who did not require oxygen had significantly higher specific (p=0.021) and nonspecific (p=0.004) cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 at the onset of infection than those who progressed to a severe form.DiscussionKnowing both humoral and cellular immune response could allow to adapt preventive strategy, by better selecting patients who would benefit from additional vaccine boosters.Trial registration numbershttps://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04355351; https://clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT04429594

New diagnostic and prognostic marker in membranous nephropathy

La Glomérulonéphrite extra-membraneuse est une maladie auto-immune rare mais grave qui conduit dans 30% des cas à une insuffisance rénale chronique terminale nécessitant le recours à la dialyse ou la greffe rénale. Dans les suites d’une greffe, la GEM récidive dans 30 à 40% des cas. En 2009, l’équipe du Pr. Salant en collaboration avec notre équipe a montré que 70% des patients présentant une GEM étaient porteurs d’anticorps (Ac) dirigés contre le récepteur des phospholipases A2 (PLA2R1). Le titre d’anticorps est corrélé à l’activité de la maladie. Il n’existe actuellement aucun biomarqueur permettant de prédire l’évolution de la fonction rénale d’un patient lors de sa prise en charge : dans 30% des cas les patients présentent une rémission spontanée sans traitement immunosuppresseur. Le traitement de la GEM repose sur un traitement symptomatique et une réévaluation après 6 mois. En cas de maladie active persistante, il faut débuter un traitement immunosuppresseur. Dans les formes graves, cette période d’observation de 6 mois peut être à l’origine de lésions irréversibles. Nous avons validé un test ELISA permettant de quantifier les Ac anti-PLA2R1 au cours du suivi de patients porteurs d’une GEM. Ce test nous a permis de montrer sur une cohorte de 15 patients greffés dans les suites d’une GEM qu’un titre d’Ac anti-PLA2R1 persistant après la greffe était associé à un risque de récidive de la maladie sur le greffon. Nous avons ensuite produit dans des cellules HEK les orthologues de PLA2R1 (les récepteurs humain, lapin et murin).Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. It is a rare but severe kidney disease with different etiologies and outcomes. In most cases (85%), the disease is idiopathic (iMN) and has an autoimmune origin. One third of patients develop end-stage kidney disease and are on kidney transplant waiting list. MN recurred in 30% after transplantation. Another third enter in spontaneous remission under renin-angiotensin system blockade. The treatment of iMN is controversial. KDIGO guidelines recommend a supportive symptomatic treatment with RAS-blockade and diuretics in all patients with iMN, and immunosuppressive therapy in case of renal function deterioration or persistent nephrotic syndrome. Therefore, immunosuppressive treatments are often started only after significant and potentially irreversible complications. No biological markers can predict clinical outcome and orient therapy. A major breakthrough was the discovery of autoantibodies to the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1, 180 kDa) in 70% of iMN patients in 2009, which has now allowed to develop diagnosis and prognosis tests for better medical care. During my PhD, I have first participated to the development of an ELISA which is now commercially available. I then used this latter to demonstrate that persistent anti-PLA2R1 activity can predict iMN recurrence after transplantation in a retrospective cohort of 15 patients. We then screened 50 patients with iMN on native kidney for their cross-reactivity to human (h), rabbit (rb) and mouse (m) PLA2R1 by western blot (WB) and antigen-specific ELISAs

Nouveaux marqueurs diagnostiques et pronostiques dans la glomérulonéphrite extra-membraneuse : suivi des anticorps anti-PLA2R1 chez le greffé rénal : caractérisation des épitopes reconnus par les anticorps anti-PLA2R1 : identification d’une nouvelle cible antigénique

Membranous Nephropathy (MN) is a major cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. It is a rare but severe kidney disease with different etiologies and outcomes. In most cases (85%), the disease is idiopathic (iMN) and has an autoimmune origin. One third of patients develop end-stage kidney disease and are on kidney transplant waiting list. MN recurred in 30% after transplantation. Another third enter in spontaneous remission under renin-angiotensin system blockade. The treatment of iMN is controversial. KDIGO guidelines recommend a supportive symptomatic treatment with RAS-blockade and diuretics in all patients with iMN, and immunosuppressive therapy in case of renal function deterioration or persistent nephrotic syndrome. Therefore, immunosuppressive treatments are often started only after significant and potentially irreversible complications. No biological markers can predict clinical outcome and orient therapy. A major breakthrough was the discovery of autoantibodies to the phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1, 180 kDa) in 70% of iMN patients in 2009, which has now allowed to develop diagnosis and prognosis tests for better medical care. During my PhD, I have first participated to the development of an ELISA which is now commercially available. I then used this latter to demonstrate that persistent anti-PLA2R1 activity can predict iMN recurrence after transplantation in a retrospective cohort of 15 patients. We then screened 50 patients with iMN on native kidney for their cross-reactivity to human (h), rabbit (rb) and mouse (m) PLA2R1 by western blot (WB) and antigen-specific ELISAs.La Glomérulonéphrite extra-membraneuse est une maladie auto-immune rare mais grave qui conduit dans 30% des cas à une insuffisance rénale chronique terminale nécessitant le recours à la dialyse ou la greffe rénale. Dans les suites d’une greffe, la GEM récidive dans 30 à 40% des cas. En 2009, l’équipe du Pr. Salant en collaboration avec notre équipe a montré que 70% des patients présentant une GEM étaient porteurs d’anticorps (Ac) dirigés contre le récepteur des phospholipases A2 (PLA2R1). Le titre d’anticorps est corrélé à l’activité de la maladie. Il n’existe actuellement aucun biomarqueur permettant de prédire l’évolution de la fonction rénale d’un patient lors de sa prise en charge : dans 30% des cas les patients présentent une rémission spontanée sans traitement immunosuppresseur. Le traitement de la GEM repose sur un traitement symptomatique et une réévaluation après 6 mois. En cas de maladie active persistante, il faut débuter un traitement immunosuppresseur. Dans les formes graves, cette période d’observation de 6 mois peut être à l’origine de lésions irréversibles. Nous avons validé un test ELISA permettant de quantifier les Ac anti-PLA2R1 au cours du suivi de patients porteurs d’une GEM. Ce test nous a permis de montrer sur une cohorte de 15 patients greffés dans les suites d’une GEM qu’un titre d’Ac anti-PLA2R1 persistant après la greffe était associé à un risque de récidive de la maladie sur le greffon. Nous avons ensuite produit dans des cellules HEK les orthologues de PLA2R1 (les récepteurs humain, lapin et murin)

Les auto-anticorps dirigés contre le récepteur des phospholipases A2 de type M sont-ils prédictifs d'une récidive de glomérulonéphrite extramembraneuse en transplantation rénale ?

NICE-BU Médecine Odontologie (060882102) / SudocSudocFranceF

Diagnostic significance of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) titres: a retrospective case-control study

Objectives To investigate the reliability of elevated titres of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) and to identify a cut-off titre in discriminating between ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV) and its mimickers.Methods This retrospective observational single-centre study included patients over 18 years with positive myeloperoxidase (MPO)-ANCA and/or proteinase 3 (PR3)-ANCA immunoassays over an 8-year period (January 2010 to December 2018), via their electronic medical files. Patients were classified according to the 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria and alternative diagnoses categorised either as non-AAV autoimmune disorders (ANCA-AI) or disorders without autoimmune features (ANCA-O). Findings from the AAV group were compared with those of ANCA-AI and ANCA-O groups and followed by a multivariate logistic stepwise regression analysis of features associated with AAV.Results 288 ANCA-positive patients of which 49 had AAV were altogether included. There was no difference between patients between the ANCA-AI (n=99) and the ANCA-O (n=140) groups. The AUC for titres discriminating AAV from mimickers was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.87). The best threshold titre, irrespective of PR3-ANCA or MPO-ANCA, was 65 U/mL with a negative predictive value of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.00). On multivariate analysis, an ANCA titre ≥65 U/mL was independently associated with AAV with an OR of 34.21 (95% CI 9.08 to 129.81; p<0.001). Other risk factors were: pulmonary fibrosis (OR, 11.55 (95% CI, 3.87 to 34.47, p<0.001)), typical ear nose and throat involvement (OR, 5.67 (95% CI, 1.64 to 19.67); p=0.006) and proteinuria (OR, 6.56 (95% CI, 2.56 to 16.81; p<0.001)).Conclusion High PR3/MPO-ANCA titres can help to discriminate between AAV and their mimickers in patients presenting with small-calibre vasculitides, with a threshold titre of 65 U/mL and above

Nouveaux rôles physiopathologiques pour le récepteur PLA2R1 dans le cancer et la glomérulonéphrite extramembraneuse

PLA2R1 (phospholipase A2 receptor 1) est un récepteur membranaire de 180-kDa, membre de la superfamille des lectines de type C. Il doit sa découverte à sa haute affinité pour les phospholipases A2 sécrétées (sPLA2), des enzymes impliquées dans la synthèse de médiateurs lipidiques. Au-delà de son rôle dans certaines pathologies inflammatoires, deux études récentes suggèrent deux nouvelles fonctions pour PLA2R1 : l’une dans le cancer, comme gène suppresseur de tumeurs, et l’autre dans la glomérulonéphrite extramembraneuse idiopathique, comme antigène majeur de cette maladie auto-immune. Ces découvertes pourraient rapidement faire de PLA2R1 une nouvelle cible diagnostique et thérapeutique

When scientific journals disseminate pseudoscience

We alert in this position paper the scientific community against the dissemination of pseudoscience in apparently sane scientific journals, and the dangers that such a spreading are causing to public health. Seneff et al. recently published in Food & Chemical Toxicology a series of fallacious arguments against Covid-19 vaccination. The important shortcomings and misusage of scientific literature and data have no place in a scientific journal. Therefore, we explain why this article should be retracted in an effort to prevent further damages to health care policies

Phospholipase A2 Receptor 1 Epitope Spreading at Baseline Predicts Reduced Likelihood of Remission of Membranous Nephropathy

G.L. and P.R. contributed equally to this work.International audienceThe phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R1) is the major autoantigen in primary membranous nephropathy. Several PLA2R1 epitopes have been characterized, and a retrospective study identified PLA2R1 epitope spreading as a potential indicator of poor prognosis. Here, we analyzed the predictive value of anti-PLA2R1 antibody (PLA2R1-Ab) titers and epitope spreading in a prospective cohort of 58 patients positive for PLA2R1-Ab randomly allocated to rituximab (n=29) or antiproteinuric therapy alone (n=29). At baseline, the epitope profile (CysR, CysRC1, CysRC7, or CysRC1C7) did not correlate with age, sex, time from diagnosis, proteinuria, or serum albumin, but epitope spreading strongly correlated with PLA2R1-Ab titer (P<0.001). Ten (58.8%) of the 17 patients who had epitope spreading at baseline and were treated with rituximab showed reversal of epitope spreading at month 6. In adjusted analysis, epitope spreading at baseline was associated with a decreased remission rate at month 6 (odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 to 0.72; P=0.02) and last follow-up (median, 23 months; odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.64; P=0.01), independently from age, sex, baseline PLA2R1-Ab level, and treatment group. We propose that epitope spreading at baseline be considered in the decision for early therapeutic intervention in patients with primary membranous nephropathy

Th17-Immune Response in Patients With Membranous Nephropathy Is Associated With Thrombosis and Relapses: Th17-Immune Response in Patients With Membranous Nephropathy Is Associated With Thrombosis and Relapses

International audienceExciting times for the field of renal autoimmune diseases have begun. In 2021, for the first time, two new drugs belimumab (1) and voclosporin ( 2) are approved for the treatment of lupus nephritis (LN) (1, 2). Other novel targeted therapies demonstrate clinical efficacy in large, randomized trials, such as avacopan for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) (3), imlifidase for Goodpasture’s disease and iptacopan for IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Pathogenic molecules are specifically targeted by new drugs that help to uncover novel aspects of disease mechanisms leading to glomerulonephritis. Simultaneously, the field is boosted by novel big data technologies on the single cell levels such as high-sensitive multi-color flow cytometry, single-cell genomics (single-cell RNA sequencing - scRNAseq), single cell metabolomics and proteomics. The novel treatment options in renal autoimmune diseases almost simultaneously require new immunomonitoring tools. ‘Immunomonitoring’includes the wide range of approaches to monitoring immune responses by the cellular immune system (e.g. T-cells, B-cells, plasma cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils etc.), or by the humoral immune system (e.g. cytokines, (auto-)antibodies, urinary markers, etc.). Monitoring relevant immune responses in patients with renal autoimmune diseases helps us to better understand a) the underpinning immunological pathophysiology of these diseases; b) the beneficial effects of novel treatments on autoimmunity; and c) can potentially help doctors and patients guide a personalized treatment strategy, adding information on immunological (non-)response to a clinical (non-) response treatment and on disease prognosis. In the present Research Topic, we have been able to collect for you a vast amount of research addressing novel ways and the roleof immunomonitoring in the broad range of renal autoimmune disease including LN, AAV, IgAN, idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) and complement-mediated disease (CMD)