11 research outputs found
Nanosized metal oxides (NMOs) and polyoxometalates (POMs) for antibacterial water treatment
This chapter describes nanosized metal oxides (NMOs) and polyoxometalates (POMs) and offers new insights into the design of efficient, modular and multifunctional water treatment processes. NMOs are characterized by high specific surface areas, accessible sorption sites and short intra-particle diffusion distances. A promising strategy to improve NMO applicability to real-world wastewater treatment consists of the dispersion of NMOs with antibacterial properties into porous supports or synthetic and naturally occurring polymers. POMs are characterized by an unmatched versatility in terms of structural features, resulting in a broad range of potential applications in catalysis, material science and medicine. The development of efficient POM-based antimicrobial systems suitable for water treatment, wound dressing and medical applications is an active multidisciplinary challenge. The most attractive feature of POMs in terms of their development as biologically active compounds is that they can be obtained from cheap precursors. NMOs and PMOs offer several advantages and opportunities for the development of novel systems for water cleaning and disinfection
Utilization of reverse osmosis (RO) for reuse of MBR-treated wastewater in irrigation-preliminary tests and quality analysis of product water
Techno-economic assessment of fertiliser drawn forward osmosis process for greenwall plants from urban wastewater
An Evidence-Based Theory About PRO Use in Kidney Care: A Realist Synthesis
Background:
There is international interest on the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in nephrology.
Objectives:
Our objectives were to develop a kidney-specific program theory about use of PROs in nephrology that may enhance person-centered care, both at individual and aggregated levels of care, and to test and refine this theory through a systematic review of the empirical literature. Together, these objectives articulate what works or does not work, for whom, and why.
Methods:
Realist synthesis methodology guided the electronic database and gray literature searches (in January 2017 and October 2018), screening, and extraction conducted independently by three reviewers. Sources included all nephrology patients and/or practitioners. Through a process of extraction and synthesis, each included source was examined to assess how contexts may trigger mechanisms to influence specific outcomes.
Results:
After screening 19,961 references, 84 theoretical and 34 empirical sources were used. PROs are proposed to be useful for providing nephrology care through three types of use. The first type is use of individual-level PRO data at point of care, receiving the majority of theoretical and empirical explorations. Clinician use to support person-centered care, and patient use to support patient engagement, are purported to improve satisfaction, health, and quality of life. Contextual factors specific to the kidney care setting that may influence the use of PRO data include the complexity of kidney disease symptom burden, symptoms that may be stigmatized, comorbidities, and time or administrative constraints in dialysis settings. Electronic collection of PROs may facilitate PRO use given these contexts. The second type is use of aggregated PRO data at point of care, including public reporting of PROs to inform decisions at point of care and improve quality of care, and use of PROs for treatment decisions. The third type is use of aggregated PRO data by organizations, including publicly available PRO data to compare centers. In single-payer systems, regular collection of PROs by dialysis centers can be achieved through economic incentives. Both the second and third types of PRO use include pressures that may trigger quality improvement processes.
Conclusion:
The current state of the evidence is primarily theoretical. There is pressing need for empirical research to improve the evidence-base of PRO use at individual and aggregated levels of nephrology care
Oral Hygiene Habits in People On Hemodialysis: a Multinational Prospective Cohort Study (Oral-D)
Separation of perchlorates from aqueous solution using functionalized graphene oxide nanosheets: a computational study
Prospects for the Use of Electrooxidation and Electrocoagulation Techniques for Membrane Filtration of Irrigation Water
BJS commission on surgery and perioperative care post-COVID-19
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020 and global surgical practice was compromised. This Commission aimed to document and reflect on the changes seen in the surgical environment during the pandemic, by reviewing colleagues experiences and published evidence. Methods: In late 2020, BJS contacted colleagues across the global surgical community and asked them to describe how severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had affected their practice. In addition to this, the Commission undertook a literature review on the impact of COVID-19 on surgery and perioperative care. A thematic analysis was performed to identify the issues most frequently encountered by the correspondents, as well as the solutions and ideas suggested to address them. Results: BJS received communications for this Commission from leading clinicians and academics across a variety of surgical specialties in every inhabited continent. The responses from all over the world provided insights into multiple facets of surgical practice from a governmental level to individual clinical practice and training. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic has uncovered a variety of problems in healthcare systems, including negative impacts on surgical practice. Global surgical multidisciplinary teams are working collaboratively to address research questions about the future of surgery in the post-COVID-19 era. The COVID-19 pandemic is severely damaging surgical training. The establishment of a multidisciplinary ethics committee should be encouraged at all surgical oncology centres. Innovative leadership and collaboration is vital in the post-COVID-19 era
BJS commission on surgery and perioperative care post-COVID-19
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the WHO on 11 March 2020 and global surgical practice was compromised. This Commission aimed to document and reflect on the changes seen in the surgical environment during the pandemic, by reviewing colleagues' experiences and published evidence