75 research outputs found

    New insights into Legionella pneumophila biofilm regulation by c-di-GMP signaling

    Get PDF
    The waterborne pathogen Legionella pneumophila grows as a biofilm, freely or inside amoebae. Cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP), a bacterial second messenger frequently implicated in biofilm formation, is synthesized and degraded by diguanylate cyclases (DGCs) and phosphodiesterases (PDEs), respectively. To characterize the c-di-GMP-metabolizing enzymes involved in L. pneumophila biofilm regulation, the consequences on biofilm formation and the c-di-GMP concentration of each corresponding gene inactivation were assessed in the Lens strain. The results showed that one DGC and two PDEs enhance different aspects of biofilm formation, while two proteins with dual activity (DGC/PDE) inhibit biofilm growth. Surprisingly, only two mutants exhibited a change in global c-di-GMP concentration. This study highlights that specific c-di-GMP pathways control L. pneumophila biofilm formation, most likely via temporary and/or local modulation of c-di-GMP concentration. Furthermore, Lpl1054 DGC is required to enable the formation a dense biofilm in response to nitric oxide, a signal for biofilm dispersion in many other species

    Inhibition of glucuronidation in pancreatic cancer improves gemcitabine anticancer activity

    Get PDF
    Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatmentis focused on two regimens. The polychemotherapy, FOLFIRINOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxali-platin), is used in patients with good health conditions, while gemcitabine, as monotherapy, in patients withpoor health conditions. Gemcitabine resistance-associated pathways have been targeted to sensitize cancercells, but the results were disappointing. Using a transcrip-tomic bioinformatics analysis combined with biologicalvalidation, we showed that glucuronidation was associated with the gemcitabine resistance in PDAC, and its inhibition could switch tumors from resistant to sensitive.To unravel the biological drivers of gemcitabineresponse in PDAC, we determined the transcriptomic dissimilarity between two preclinical models with definedgemcitabine sensitivity.Fil: Fraunhoffer Navarro, Nicolas Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos; ArgentinaFil: Meilerman Abuelafia, Analía. Inserm; FranciaFil: Chanez, Brice. Inserm; FranciaFil: Bigonnet, Martin. Inserm; FranciaFil: Gayet, Odile. Inserm; FranciaFil: Roques, Julie. Inserm; FranciaFil: Chuluyan, Hector Eduardo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos; ArgentinaFil: Dusetti, Nelson. Inserm; FranciaFil: Iovanna, Juan Lucio. Inserm; Franci

    Exploring the complementarity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma preclinical models

    Get PDF
    Purpose: Compare pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), preclinical models, by their transcriptome and drug response landscapes to evaluate their complementarity. Experimental De-sign: Three paired PDAC preclinical models—patient‐derived xenografts (PDX), xenograft‐derived pancreatic organoids (XDPO) and xenograft‐derived primary cell cultures (XDPCC)—were derived from 20 patients and analyzed at the transcriptomic and chemosensitivity level. Transcriptomic characterization was performed using the basal‐like/classical subtyping and the PDAC molecular gradient (PAMG). Chemosensitivity for gemcitabine, irinotecan, 5‐fluorouracil and oxaliplatin was established and the associated biological pathways were determined using independent component analysis (ICA) on the transcriptome of each model. The selection criteria used to identify the different components was the chemosensitivity score (CSS) found for each drug in each model. Results: PDX was the most dispersed model whereas XDPO and XDPCC were mainly classical and basal-like, respectively. Chemosensitivity scoring determines that PDX and XDPO display a positive correlation for three out of four drugs tested, whereas PDX and XDPCC did not correlate. No match was observed for each tumor chemosensitivity in the different models. Finally, pathway analysis shows a significant association between PDX and XDPO for the chemosensitivity‐associated pathways and PDX and XDPCC for the chemoresistance‐associated pathways. Conclusions: Each PDAC preclinical model possesses a unique basal‐like/classical transcriptomic phenotype that strongly in-fluences their global chemosensitivity. Each preclinical model is imperfect but complementary, sug-gesting that a more representative approach of the clinical reality could be obtained by combining them. Translational Relevance: The identification of molecular signatures that underpin drug sensitivity to chemotherapy in PDAC remains clinically challenging. Importantly, the vast majority of studies using preclinical in vivo and in vitro models fail when transferred to patients in a clinical setting despite initially promising results. This study presents for the first time a comparison between three preclinical models directly derived from the same patients. We show that their applica-bility to preclinical studies should be considered with a complementary focus, avoiding tumor-based direct extrapolations, which might generate misleading conclusions and consequently the overlook of clinically relevant features.Fil: Hoare, Owen. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Fraunhoffer Navarro, Nicolas Alejandro. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Centro de Estudios Farmacológicos y Botánicos; ArgentinaFil: Elkaoutari, Abdessamad. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Gayet, Odile. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Bigonnet, Martin. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Roques, Julie. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Nicolle, Rémy. No especifíca;Fil: McGuckin, Colin. Cell Therapy Research Institute; FranciaFil: Forraz, Nico. Cell Therapy Research Institute; FranciaFil: Sohier, Emilie. Le Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Léon Bérard; FranciaFil: Tonon, Laurie. Le Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Léon Bérard; FranciaFil: Wajda, Pauline. Le Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Léon Bérard; FranciaFil: Boyault, Sandrine. Le Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Léon Bérard; FranciaFil: Attignon, Valéry. Le Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Léon Bérard; FranciaFil: Tabone, Luciana Belen. Le Centre Régional de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Léon Bérard; FranciaFil: Barbier, Sandrine. No especifíca;Fil: Mignard, Caroline. No especifíca;Fil: Duchamp, Olivier. No especifíca;Fil: Iovanna, Juan. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; FranciaFil: Dusetti, Nelson J.. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; Franci

    Retrospective evaluation of whole exome and genome mutation calls in 746 cancer samples

    No full text
    Funder: NCI U24CA211006Abstract: The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts

    TNF-α induces endothelial–mesenchymal transition promoting stromal development of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

    No full text
    International audienceEndothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndMT) is an important source of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), which facilitates tumour progression. PDAC is characterised by abundant CAFs and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). Here, we show that TNF-α strongly induces human endothelial cells to undergo EndMT. Interestingly, TNF-α strongly downregulates the expression of the endothelial receptor TIE1, and reciprocally TIE1 overexpression partially prevents TNF-α-induced EndMT, suggesting that TNF-α acts, at least partially, through TIE1 regulation in this process. We also show that TNF-α-induced EndMT is reversible. Furthermore, TNF-α treatment of orthotopic mice resulted in an important increase in the stroma, including CAFs. Finally, secretome analysis identified TNFSF12, as a regulator that is also present in PDAC patients. With the aim of restoring normal angiogenesis and better access to drugs, our results support the development of therapies targeting CAFs or inducing the EndMT reversion process in PDAC
    corecore