Relation of Iron Status to Prognosis After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Iron deficiency has been extensively researched and is associated with adverse outcomes in heart failure. However, to our knowledge, the temporal evolution of iron status has not been previously investigated in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Therefore, we aimed to explore the temporal pattern of repeatedly measured iron, ferritin, transferrin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) in relation to prognosis post-ACS. BIOMArCS (BIOMarker study to identify the Acute risk of a Coronary Syndrome) is a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort study conducted in The Netherlands between 2008 and 2015. A total of 844 patients with post-ACS were enrolled and underwent high-frequency (median 17) blood sampling during 1 year follow-up. Biomarkers of iron status were measured batchwise in a central laboratory. We analyzed 3 patient subsets, including the case-cohort (n = 187). The primary endpoint (PE) was a composite of cardiovascular mortality and repeat nonfatal ACS, including unstable angina pectoris requiring revascularization. The association between iron status and the PE was analyzed using multivariable joint models. Mean age was 63 years; 78% were men, and >50% had iron deficiency at first sample in the case-cohort. After adjustment for a broad range of clinical variables, 1 SD decrease in log-iron was associated with a 2.2-fold greater risk of the PE (hazard ratio 2.19, 95% confidence interval 1.34 to 3.54, p = 0.002). Similarly, 1 SD decrease in log-TSAT was associated with a 78% increased risk of the PE (hazard ratio 1.78, 95% confidence interval 1.17 to 2.65, p = 0.006). Ferritin and transferrin were not associated with the PE. Repeated measurements of iron and TSAT predict risk of adverse outcomes in patients with post-ACS during 1 year follow-up. Trial Registration: The Netherlands Trial Register. Unique identifiers: NTR1698 and NTR1106. Registered at https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/1614 and https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/1073

Evaluation of MEG vs EEG after sleep deprivation in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE: MEG and EEG after sleep deprivation (EEG-SD) are applied as diagnostic tools in the evaluation of patients with possible epilepsy. There is no gold standard to check whether the diagnosis based on these two modalities is correct. The best standard available is the long-term follow-up of patients. As follow-up of an earlier study in which the additional value of MEG vs EEG-SD diagnosis was evaluated, we investigated the long-term validity of MEG-based and EEG-SD-based diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data collected from 46 patients were used in a comparative study of the last known diagnosis against the original one of 8 years ago. RESULTS: Long-term (3-8 years) sensitivity of sharp phenomena (combining spikes and sharp waves) in routine MEG and in EEG-SD for the diagnosis epilepsy is 71% and 62%, respectively. When compared to the original study, this hardly changed. Over time, uncertainty on diagnosis diminishes. CONCLUSION: MEG as well as EEG-SD are robust long-term predictors for epilepsy